Abstract
In this article we suggest that the research area of epistemology of disagreement should be critically applied to the problem of describing multi-experts multi-criteria decision-making (ME-MCDM), while providing an epistemic conceptualization of experts as epistemic peers. We explore some preliminary outcomes of using Dung’s computational framework for argumentation in ME-MCDM with conceptual considerations on the role of formal constraints and rationality approaches for epistemic peer disagreement, such as provided by David Christensen [2], inclusive of epistemic and pragmatic rationality, synchronic and diachronic rationality, and global and local aspects thereof.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bistarelli, S., Santini, F.: A common computational framework for semiring- based argumentation systems. Font. Artif. Intell. Appl.: ECAI 2010 215(131-136) (2010)
Christensen, D.: Putting Logic in its Place: Formal Constraints to Rational Belief. Oxford University Press (2007)
Christensen, D., Lackey, J. (eds.): The Epistemology Of Disagreement: New essays. Oxford University Press (2013)
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmono- tonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321–357 (1995)
Garbayo, L.: Epistemic considerations on expert disagreement, normative justification and inconsistency regarding multi-criteria decision-making. In Ceberio, M., Krenovich, V.: (eds.), Constraint Programming and Decision MakingStudies in Computational Intelligence Vol. 539, pp. 35-45(2010)
Henderson, J., Bistarelli, S., Ceberio, M.: Multi-Experts Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Presented at the international conference on numerical computations: theory and algorithms, NUMTA 2013
Rami, B.: An overview of methods to elicit and model expert clinical judgment and decision making. Soc. Serv. Rev. 66(4), 596–616 (1992)
Wang, X., Garcia Contreras, A. F., Ceberio, M., Del Hoyo, C., Gutierrez, L. C., Virani, S.: Interval-based algorithms to extract fuzzy measures for software quality assessment. In: North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS’2012), Berkeley, CA, August 2012
Yager, R.: Non-Numeric Multi-Criteria Multi-Person Decision-Making. Group Decis. Negot. 2, 81–93 (1993)
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation, NSF CCF grant 0953339 and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, AAAS MIRC (agreement date 112612).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garbayo, L., Ceberio, M., Bistarelli, S., Henderson, J. (2018). On Modeling Multi-experts Multi-criteria Decision-Making Argumentation and Disagreement: Philosophical and Computational Approaches Reconsidered. In: Ceberio, M., Kreinovich, V. (eds) Constraint Programming and Decision Making: Theory and Applications. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 100. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61753-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61753-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61752-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61753-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)