Skip to main content

Identifying Fake Review Comments for Hostel Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Swarm Intelligence (ICSI 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10386))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Nowadays, consumers are inclined to issue their opinions for merchandise in the era of Web 2.0. As a result, numerous review comments about different products or services are accumulated on various websites every day. It has been found that to manipulate customer opinions, some dealers created the review comments in order to exaggerate the advantages of their own products or defame rival’s reputation. This study strived to identify the negative fake review comments which were falsely created and aimed at attacking targeted products. The method created three word banks, namely, vagueness, and positive and negative attacks. The number of these words appearing in each review comments were calculated and applied to build logistic regression models. The experiment was conducted with true hostel review comments taking from “TripAdvisor” and the comparison group “Fake reviews” on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In the case where the ratio of fake and true review comments are10% in the training data, the proposed method reached 100%, 51.5% and 3% of precision, accuracy and recall, respectively. When the ratio is 50%, the method could reach 64%, 64%, 64% of precision, accuracy and recall respectively. The performance is better than the benchmark method which based on LIWC and SVM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allport, G.W., Postman, L.: The Psychology of Rumor. Henry Holt, New York (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hu, N., Liu, L., Zhang, J.(Jennifer).: Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Inf. Technol. Manage. 9, 201–214 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Analyzing and detecting review spam. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Data Mining, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 547–552. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kapferer, J.N.: Rumors - Uses, Interpretations, and Images. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koenig, F.: Rumor in the Marketplace. Dover, Auburn House (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, D., Kim, H.S., Kim, J.K.: The role of self-construal in consumers’ electronic word of mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites: a social cognitive approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28, 1054–1062 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Losiewicz, P., Oard, D.W., Kostoff, R.N.: Textual data mining to support science and technology management (2000). http://www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/special/technowatch/textmine.htm

  8. Ott, M., Yejin, C., Claire, C., Jeffrey, T.H.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Stroudsburg, and Portland, USA, pp. 309–319 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ravid, S.A., Basuroy, S., Chatterjee, S.: How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. J. Mark. 67(4), 103 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shibutani, T.: Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor. Bobbs Merrill, Indianapolis (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  11. TripAdvisor. 20 Best Chicago hotels on TripAdvisor - prices & reviews for the top rated accommodation in Chicago (2015). http://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotels-g35805-Chicago_Illinois-Hotels.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Shien Cheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lin, M.Y., Hsu, P.Y., Cheng, M.S., Lei, H.T., Hsu, M.C. (2017). Identifying Fake Review Comments for Hostel Industry. In: Tan, Y., Takagi, H., Shi, Y., Niu, B. (eds) Advances in Swarm Intelligence. ICSI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10386. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61833-3_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61833-3_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61832-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61833-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics