Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 263 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to study the competition between pressure and gravity in the evolution of perturbations in a planar stratification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is a slightly different definition from \(L_1\) given by (6.25) to avoid carrying \(\sqrt{2}\) factors in the following.

  2. 2.

    This corresponds to equation (8.15) where we have used the hydrostatic equilibrium (6.1) which in the planar case reads \(g_0 = c_a^2 \frac{\rho _0'}{\rho _0}\).

  3. 3.

    And not \(2 x_t\), though the slab spans between \(-x_t\) and \(+x_t\), because we have imposed boundary conditions such that the displacement vanishes at \(x=x_t\) and \(x=0\).

  4. 4.

    Of course, one may eliminate \(k_y^2\), writing \(\omega _G^2 = \omega _y^2 - (c_a^2)'' - \omega _0^2\), but the form given here is how it naturally appears, and is such that the comparison with its cylindrical generalization (9.6) is transparent. And in the latter case, the analogue of \(k_y\) is position dependent so that we may not simplify like here.

  5. 5.

    “he ends up with a fourth order differential equation with very complicated coefficients”.

  6. 6.

    The dependence on \((c_a^2)'''\) is hidden in the factors \(\Omega _G' = - k_y^2 (c_a^2)' + (c_a^2)''' + \omega _0 \frac{\rho _0'}{\rho _0}\) that I have left this way to make the expression (8.57) a little bit more compact.

  7. 7.

    It is tempting to think that the case considered here is physically motivated by the fact that in most cosmological environments dark matter dominates the density budget and the gravitational potential in which baryons evolve. But there is no reason a priori that if \(\rho _0 \ll \rho _\mathrm {0ext}\), then \(\rho _\mathrm {1ext} \ll \rho _1\). So my feeling about this model is that it is an interesting case in which, for some reason, the background fluid is stiff. Note also that in reality, in the cosmic web, the dark matter density distribution contains non linear substructures (e.g. Schneider et al. 2010) into which cold baryonic gas may fall. I do not include those in my analysis precisely because my aim is to investigate whether the gas may fragment gravitationally on its own.

  8. 8.

    As stated above, WKB approximations are often very good approximations even beyond their strict domain of validity, so that the precautions taken here may turn out to be unnecessary. Comparison with a numerical resolution (e.g. with a shooting method Goedbloed and Poedts 2004) will give this answer.

  9. 9.

    As in the sections about the wave equation, we are working with \(\omega ^2 \ne \omega _y^2\) and discussing singularities later.

  10. 10.

    This is not a trivial statement per se, since in general \(e^{A} e^{B} \ne e^{A+B}\), but it is the case when A and B commute. Here the matrices \(-s A_0\) and \(s A_0\) clearly commute.

  11. 11.

    Recall that \(\hat{\xi }_x\) is proportional to \(\psi \) so that with the boundary conditions we are going to consider shortly, we may use \(\psi \) rather than \(\hat{\xi }_x\) to determine the discrete spectrum.

  12. 12.

    Indeed, \(\Delta < 0\) is equivalent to \(\frac{\omega ^2}{c_a^2}-k_y^2-\frac{k_\rho ^2}{4}>0\), but since \(\frac{\omega ^2}{c_a^2}-k_y^2-\frac{k_\rho ^2}{4} = \frac{\omega ^2}{c_a^2} - k_y k_\rho -(k_y - \frac{k_\rho }{2})^2\) and that \((k_y - \frac{k_\rho }{2})^2 \ge 0\), we have \(\frac{\omega ^2}{c_a^2} - k_y k_\rho >0\).

  13. 13.

    My precaution in the formulation comes from the fact that \(\delta \) contains \(k_\rho x_t\), and the competition of the \(e^{k_y x_t}\) factor has to be assessed properly. At this point I will just say the \(k_y\) has to be small enough, leaving the rest for future work.

References

  • Aslangul, C. (2011). Des mathématiques pour les sciences—Concepts, méthodes et techniques pour la modélisation, Collection Licence Maîtrise Doctorat (De Boeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. (2008) Galactic dynamics (2nd edn). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokland, J. W. S., van der Swaluw, E., Keppens, R., & Goedbloed, J. P. (2005). Astronomy and Astrophysics, 444, 337.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. P. (1980). Theory of stellar pulsation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidberg, J. P. (2014). Ideal MHD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedbloed, J. P. (1984). Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, 12, 107.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Goedbloed, J. P., Keppens, R., & Poedts, S. (2010). Advanced magnetohydrodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedbloed, J. P. H., & Poedts, S. (2004) Principles of magnetohydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldreich, P., & Lynden-Bell, D. (1965). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 130, 97.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. H. (2013) Texts in applied mathematics, Introduction to perturbation methods (Vol. 20). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppens, R., van der Linden, R. A. M., & Goossens, M. (1993). Solar Physics, 144, 267.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux, P. (1950). IIIe Congrès national des sciences, Bruxelles, 30 mai - 3 juin 1950, Vol. 2 (Liège: Desoer), (pp. 133–136).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux, P., & Walraven, T. (1958). Encyclopedia of Physics/Handbuch der Physik (Vol. 11/51, pp. 353–604). Astrophysics II: Stellar Structure/Astrophysik II: Sternaufbau. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifschitz, A. E. (1989) Developments in electromagnetic theory and applications (Vol. 4) Magnetohydrodynamics and spectral theory. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekeris, C. L. (1938). The Astrophysical Journal, 88, 189.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., Krauss, L., & Moore, B. (2010). Physical Review D, 82, 063525.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeyers, P., & Van Hoolst, T. (2010). Astrophysics and space science library (Vol. 371), Linear Isentropic Oscillations of Stars. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, C. A. (2016). Lectures on differential equations, lecture notes, creative commons license. Davis: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Baptiste Durrive .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Durrive, JB. (2017). Stability of Cosmic Walls. In: Baryonic Processes in the Large-Scale Structuring of the Universe. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61881-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics