Skip to main content

Parameterized Complexity of Geometric Covering Problems Having Conflicts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10389))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The input for the Geometric Coverage problem consists of a pair \(\varSigma =(P,\mathcal {R})\), where P is a set of points in \(\mathbb {R}^d\) and \(\mathcal {R}\) is a set of subsets of P defined by the intersection of P with some geometric objects in \(\mathbb {R}^d\). These coverage problems form special instances of the Set Cover problem which is notoriously hard in several paradigms including approximation and parameterized complexity. Motivated by what are called choice problems in geometry, we consider a variation of the Geometric Coverage problem where there are conflicts on the covering objects that precludes some objects from being part of the solution if some others are in the solution.

As our first contribution, we propose two natural models in which the conflict relations are given: (a) by a graph on the covering objects, and (b) by a representable matroid on the covering objects. We consider the parameterized complexity of the problem based on the structure of the conflict relation. Our main result is that as long as the conflict graph has bounded arboricity (that includes all the families of intersection graphs of low density objects in low dimensional Euclidean space), there is a parameterized reduction to the problem without conflicts on the covering objects. This is achieved through a randomization-derandomization trick. As a consequence, we have the following results when the conflict graph has bounded arboricity.

  • If the Geometric Coverage problem is fixed parameter tractable (FPT), then so is the conflict free version.

  • If the Geometric Coverage problem admits a factor \(\alpha \)-approximation, then the conflict free version admits a factor \(\alpha \)-approximation algorithm running in FPT time.

As a corollary to our main result we get a plethora of approximation algorithms running in FPT time. Our other results include an FPT algorithm and a W[1]-hardness proof for the conflict-free version of Covering Points by Intervals. The FPT algorithm is for the case when the conflicts are given by a representable matroid, and the W[1]-hardness result is for all the families of conflict graphs for which the Independent Set problem is W[1]-hard.

Supported by Parameterized Approximation, ERC Starting Grant 306992, and Rigorous Theory of Preprocessing, ERC Advanced Investigator Grant 267959.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkin, E.M., Banik, A., Carmi, P., Citovsky, G., Katz, M.J., Mitchell, J.S.B., Simakov, M.: Choice is hard. In: Elbassioni, K., Makino, K. (eds.) ISAAC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9472, pp. 318–328. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48971-0_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Arkin, E.M., Banik, A., Carmi, P., Citovsky, G., Katz, M.J., Mitchell, J.S.B., Simakov, M.: Conflict-free covering. In: CCCG (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banik, A., Panolan, F., Raman, V., Sahlot, V.: Fréchet distance between a line and avatar point set. In: FSTTCS, pp. 32: 1–32: 14 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cygan, M., Fomin, F.V., Kowalik, L., Lokshtanov, D., Marx, D., Pilipczuk, M., Pilipczuk, M., Saurabh, S.: Parameterized algorithms. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diestel, R.: Graph Theory, 4th edn. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 173. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fomin, F.V., Lokshtanov, D., Panolan, F., Saurabh, S.: Efficient computation of representative families with applications in parameterized and exact algorithms. J. ACM 63(4), 29 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabow, H.N., Westermann, H.H.: Forests, frames, and games: Algorithms for matroid sums and applications. Algorithmica 7(5&6), 465–497 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Har-Peled, S., Quanrud, K.: Approximation algorithms for low-density graphs. CoRR abs/1501.00721 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Har-Peled, S., Quanrud, K.: Approximation algorithms for polynomial-expansion and low-density graphs. In: Bansal, N., Finocchi, I. (eds.) ESA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9294, pp. 717–728. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48350-3_60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunt III, H.B., Marathe, M.V., Radhakrishnan, V., Ravi, S.S., Rosenkrantz, D.J., Stearns, R.E.: NC-approximation schemes for NP- and PSPACE-hard problems for geometric graphs. J. Algorithms 26(2), 238–274 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karp, R.M.: Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Proceedings of a symposium on the Complexity of Computer Computations. pp. 85–103 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lokshtanov, D., Misra, P., Panolan, F., Saurabh, S.: Deterministic truncation of linear matroids. In: Halldórsson, M.M., Iwama, K., Kobayashi, N., Speckmann, B. (eds.) ICALP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9134, pp. 922–934. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47672-7_75

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lokshtanov, D., Panolan, F., Saurabh, S., Sharma, R., Zehavi, M.: Covering small independent sets and separators with applications to parameterized algorithms, May 2017. ArXiv e-prints

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marx, Dániel: Parameterized complexity of independence and domination on geometric graphs. In: Bodlaender, Hans L., Langston, Michael A. (eds.) IWPEC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4169, pp. 154–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11847250_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Marx, D.: A parameterized view on matroid optimization problems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410(44), 4471–4479 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Naor, M., Schulman, J.L., Srinivasan, A.: Splitters and near-optimal derandomization. In: FOCS, pp. 182–191 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vibha Sahlot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Banik, A., Panolan, F., Raman, V., Sahlot, V., Saurabh, S. (2017). Parameterized Complexity of Geometric Covering Problems Having Conflicts. In: Ellen, F., Kolokolova, A., Sack, JR. (eds) Algorithms and Data Structures. WADS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10389. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62127-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62127-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62126-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62127-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics