Skip to main content

River Bed Morphodynamics: Metamodeling, Reliability Analysis, and Visualization in a Virtual Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scientific Computing and Algorithms in Industrial Simulations

Abstract

Numerical simulations of river bed evolution (morphodynamics) can be used for evaluating river engineering concepts and efficient operation of waterways. Reliability analysis is used to detect the origin of uncertainties, to track their propagation in the model and to evaluate their contribution to the result of the modeling. We have developed a new approach for the reliability analysis of morphohydrodynamical simulations, including a fast interpolation of simulation results with radial basis functions (RBF) and an efficient quantile estimator based on quasi-Monte Carlo sampling. Realistic examples are used to test the efficiency of the approach. An interactive 3D virtual environment has been employed for visual exploration of the results. The developed virtual environment application allows for a detailed inspection of the numerical model, including the evolution of the water level, river bed profiles and their quantiles. In this way one achieves a full immersion into the model space and an understanding of morphohydrodynamical processes in an intuitive way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M.D. Buhmann, Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Cizelj, B. Mavko, H. Riesch-Oppermann, Application of first and second order reliability methods in the safety assessment of cracked steam generator tubing. Nucl. Eng. Des. 147, 359–368 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Clees, I. Nikitin, L. Nikitina, C.-A. Thole, Nonlinear metamodeling and robust optimization in automotive design, in Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications SIMULTECH 2011, Noordwijkerhout, July 29–31 (SciTePress, Setúbal, 2011), pp. 483–491

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Clees, I. Nikitin, L. Nikitina, Nonlinear metamodeling of bulky data and applications in automotive design, in Progress in industrial mathematics at ECMI 2010, ed. by M. Günther et al. Mathematics in Industry, vol. 17 (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 295–301

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Clees, I. Nikitin, L. Nikitina, R. Kopmann, Reliability analysis of river bed simulation models, in CDROM Proceedings of EngOpt 2012, 3rd International Conference on Engineering Optimization, ed. by J.Herskovits. vol. 267. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 1–5 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Clees, I. Nikitin, L. Nikitina, C.-A. Thole, Analysis of bulky crash simulation results: deterministic and stochastic aspects, in Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications: International Conference, ed. by N. Pina, J. Kacprzyk, J. Filipe. SIMULTECH 2011 Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, July 29–31, 2011 Revised Selected Papers (Springer, Berlin, 2013), pp. 225–237

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Clees, I. Nikitin, L. Nikitina, S. Pott, Quasi-Monte Carlo and RBF metamodeling for quantile estimation in river bed morphodynamics, in Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications, ed. by M.S. Obaidat, S. Koziel, J. Kacprzyk, L. Leifsson, T. Ören. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 319 (Springer International Publishing, Berlin, 2015), pp. 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.H. Halton, Algorithm 247: Radical-inverse quasi-random point sequence. Commun. ACM 7, 701–702 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F.E. Harrell, C.E. Davis, A new distribution-free quantile estimator. Biometrika 69, 635–640 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. J.-M. Hervouet, Hydrodynamics of Free Surface Flows: Modelling with the Finite Element Method (Wiley, New York, 2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M.C. Jones, The performance of kernel density functions in kernel distribution function estimation. Stat. Probab. Lett. 9, 129–132 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Kopmann, A. Schmidt, Comparison of different reliability analysis methods for a 2D morphodynamic numerical model of River Danube, in Proceedings of River Flow 2010 - International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, Braunschweig, 8–10. Sept. 2010, ed. by A. Dittrich, K. Koll, J. Aberle, P. Geisenhainer (2010), pp. 1615–1620

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.H. Press, S. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, Chap. 7.7 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Rhein, T. Clees, M. Ruschitzka, Robustness measures and numerical approximation of the cumulative density function of response surfaces. Commun. Stat. B-Simul. 43, 1–17 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Riehme, R. Kopmann, and U. Naumann, Uncertainty quantification based on forward sensitivity analysis in SISYPHE, in Proceedings of V European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics: ECCOMAS CFD 2010, Lisbon, Portugal,14–17 June 2010, ed. by J.C.F. Pereira, A. Sequeira, ECCOMAS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.E. Sfakianakis, D.G. Verginis, A new family of nonparametric quantile estimators. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 37, 337–345 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. I.M. Sobol, On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 7, 86–112 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Sudret, Meta-models for structural reliability and uncertainty quantification, in Proceedings of 5th Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability APSSRA 2012, Singapore, ed. by K. Phoon et al., (2012), pp. 53–76

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. van Bühren, T. Clees, N. Hornung, L. Nikitina, Aspects of adaptive hierarchical RBF metamodels for optimization. J. Comput. Methods Sci. Eng. 12, 5–23 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. A.W. van der Vaart, Asymptotic Statistics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Villaret, Sisyphe 6.0 User Manual H-P73-2010-01219-FR, Department National Hydraulics and Environ-ment Laboratory, Electricité de France (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Clees .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clees, T., Nikitin, I., Nikitina, L., Pott, S., Klimenko, S. (2017). River Bed Morphodynamics: Metamodeling, Reliability Analysis, and Visualization in a Virtual Environment. In: Griebel, M., Schüller, A., Schweitzer, M. (eds) Scientific Computing and Algorithms in Industrial Simulations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62458-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics