Skip to main content

Evaluation of Adaptive Teamwork System Based upon Individual Differences in Culture Dimension (Individualism - Collectivism)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computers Supported Education (CSEDU 2016)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 739))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 822 Accesses

Abstract

Although there are various personalised and adaptive eLearning systems developed, a culture factor has been not sufficiently considered in adaptive and personalised learning environments. This paper presents a personalised and adaptive system based on individual differences in cultural backgrounds (individualism and collectivism). A culturally adaptive teamwork system called IdeasRoom is used to implement cultural additions. The IdeasRoom system has adaptations to its interface to include two different versions of design: individualist version (IND) and collectivist version (COL). The paper summarises an initial evaluation of the proposed system. This evaluation of the proposed IdeasRoom system relates to the responses of the participants of the study that involved 52 postgraduate students, so that the version that was not personalised to participants’ cultural backgrounds is compared with the version that was personalised to participants’ cultural backgrounds in terms of their perceptions of usability their preferences of design. The findings show that the participants had perceptions of usability that are shown to be at a higher level when teamwork learning systems are personalised to participants’ cultural backgrounds, which suggests that these results based on identifying users’ cultural backgrounds are of significant importance. Also, this evaluation concludes that participants’ preferences for experiencing a system are matched to their cultural inclinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alshammari, M., Anane, R., Hendley, R.J.: Adaptivity in E-learning systems. In: Proceedings - 2014 8th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS 2014, pp. 79–86 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ardito, C., et al.: An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4(3), 270–283 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 24, 574–594 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop, J.W., Chen, X., Scott, K.D.: What drives Chinese toward teamwork? A study of US-invested companies in China (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boticario, J., Santos, O., Van Rosmalen, P.: Issues in developing standard-based adaptive learning management systems (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brooke, J.: SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry, vol. 189(194), pp. 4–7 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive hypermedia for education and training. In: Durlach, P.J., Lesgold, A.M. (eds.) Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education, p. 46. Cambridge University Press, New York (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cárdenas, J.C., Mantilla, C.: Between-group competition, intra-group cooperation and relative performance. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chirkov, V.I., Lynch, M., Niwa, S.: Application of the scenario questionnaire of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism to the assessment of cultural distance and cultural fit. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 29(4), 469–490 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cox, T.H., Lobel, S.A., McLeod, P.L.: Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Acad. Manag. J. 34(4), 827–847 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Drury, H., Kay, J., Losberg, W.: Student satisfaction with groupwork in undergraduate computer science: do things get better? In: Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Conference on Computing Education, vol. 20, pp. 77–85. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erez, M., Earley, P.C.: Culture, self-identity, and work (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Essalmi, F., et al.: Generalized metrics for the analysis of E-learning personalization strategies. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48, 310–322 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fadil, P.A., Williamson, S., Knudstrup, M.: A theoretical perspective of the cultural influences of individualism/collectivism, group membership, and performance variation on allocation behaviors of supervisors. Compet. Rev. Int. Bus. J. 19(2), 134–150 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Galanes, G.J., Adams, K.H., Brilhart, J.K.: Effective Group Discussion: Theory and Practice. McGraw-Hill Humanities Social, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gelfand, M.J., Erez, M., Aycan, Z.: Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 479–514 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibbs, G.: The assessment of group work: lessons from the literature. Assessment Standards Knowledge exchange (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hauger, D., Köck, M.: State of the art of adaptivity in e-learning platforms. In: LWA, pp. 355–360 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M.: Cultures and Organizations, Software of the mind. Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for survival (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hofstede, G.H.: Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hofstede, G.H.: Cultures and Organizations, Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khaled, R.: Culturally-relevant persuasive technology. Pt Design, p. 256 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, K.-S., Moore, J.L.: Web-based learning: factors affecting students’ satisfaction and learning experience. First Monday 10(11), 115–131 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kitayama, S.: Culture and basic psychological processes–toward a system view of culture: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychol. Bull. 128(1), 89–96 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lazar, J., Feng, J.H.J., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leibbrandt, A., Gneezy, U., List, J.A.: Rise and fall of competitiveness in individualistic and collectivistic societies. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110(23), pp. 9305–9308 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mann, L., Radford, M., Kanagawa, C.: Cross-cultural differences in children’s use of decision rules: a comparison between Japan and Australia. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49(6), 1557–1564 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S.: Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98(2), 224–253 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McSweeney, B.: Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith - a failure of analysis. Hum. Relat. 55(1), 89–118 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Merkin, R., Ramadan, R.: Facework in Syria and the United States: a cross-cultural comparison. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 34(6), 661–669 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Myers, S.A., et al.: Taking a trait approach to understanding college students’ perceptions of group work. Coll. Stud. J. 43(3), 822 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Park, O., Lee, J.: Adaptive instructional systems. In: Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, (1911), pp. 651–684 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Plueddemann, J.E.: Leading Across Cultures: Effective Ministry and Mission in the Global Church. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Powell, A., Piccoli, G., Ives, B.: Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database 35(1), 6–36 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reinecke, K.: Culturally adaptive user interfaces (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sagie, A., Aycan, Z.: A cross-cultural analysis of participative decision-making in organizations. Hum. Relat. 56(4), 453–473 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shishah, W.: Culturally personalised approach in the teamwork design system. IJCIT Int. J. Comput. Inf. Technol. (IJCIT) 5(4), 383–388 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shishah, W., FitzGerald, E.: Incorporating cultural factors into the design of technology to support teamwork in higher education. In: CSEDU 2016, Rome, Italy (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shulruf, B., Hattie, J., Dixon, R.: Development of a new measurement tool for individualism and collectivism. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 25(4), 385–401 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, C., Bath, D.: The role of the learning community in the development of discipline knowledge and generic graduate outcomes. High. Educ. 51(2), 259–286 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Smith, G.G., et al.: Overcoming student resistance to group work: online versus face-to-face. Internet High. Educ. 14(2), 121–128 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stewart, C.: A cultural education model: design and implementation of adaptive multimedia interfaces in eLearning (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tielman, K., et al.: Collaborative learning in multicultural classrooms: a case study of Dutch senior secondary vocational education. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. 64(1), 103–118 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Triandis, H.C.: Culture and Social Behavior. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Triandis, H.C.: Individualism & Collectivism. Westview Press, Boulder (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Triandis, H.C.: Individualism-collectivism and personality. J. Pers. 69(6), 907–924 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tullis, T.S., Stetson, J.N.: A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability ABSTRACT: introduction. In: Usability Professional Association Conference, pp. 1–12 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tutty, J.I., Klein, J.D.: Computer-mediated instruction: a comparison of online and face-to-face collaboration. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 56(2), 101–124 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zaharias, P., Poylymenakou, A.: Developing a usability evaluation method for e-learning applications: beyond functional usability. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 25(1), 75–98 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wesam Shishah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shishah, W. (2017). Evaluation of Adaptive Teamwork System Based upon Individual Differences in Culture Dimension (Individualism - Collectivism). In: Costagliola, G., Uhomoibhi, J., Zvacek, S., McLaren, B. (eds) Computers Supported Education. CSEDU 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 739. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63184-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63184-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63183-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63184-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics