Skip to main content
  • 1668 Accesses

Abstract

Building on Susan Mizruchi’s article, “Lolita in History,” Wood uses Deleuze and Guattari’s analysis of the affective dimensions of fascism to show how the characters in Lolita are driven by fascistic desires. Unlike Deleuze and Guattari , Nabokov portrays liberating desire as a delusory trap. Instead, toward the end of Lolita Dolores Haze and Humbert Humbert exhibit signs of altruism born of suffering (ABS), a psychological phenomenon supported by some recent cognitive studies. Though this change is ambiguous and incomplete, Nabokov uses religious allusions to suggest its transcendent power. Mentalizing with the characters’ responses to suffering, Wood argues, pushes readers toward what Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick calls “reparative reading ” and what Nabokov terms the “kindness ” and “tenderness” inseparable from “aesthetic bliss .”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Appel, Alfred Jr. “Introduction.” In The Annotated Lolita: Revised and Updated, by Vladimir Nabokov, xvii–lxvii. Edited by Alfred Appel, Jr. New York: Vintage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, M. Keith. Literature and Domination: Sex, Knowledge, and Power in Modern Fiction. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centerwall, Brandon S. “Hiding in Plain Sight: Nabokov and Pedophilia.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 32 no. 3 (1990): 468–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. Julian. “Russian Cultural Contexts for Lolita.” In Approaches to Teaching Nabokov’s Lolita, edited by Zoran Kuzmanovich and Galya Diment, 89–93. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragunoiu, Dana. “Lolita: Law, Ethics, Politics.” In Approaches to Teaching Nabokov’s Lolita, edited by Zoran Kuzmanovich and Galya Diment, 121–127. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Durantaye, Leland. Style Is Matter: The Moral Art of Vladimir Nabokov. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Brad and Julian Reid. “Introduction.” In Deleuze and Fascism: Security: War: Aesthetics, edited by Brad Evans and Julian Reid, 1–12. New York: Routledge, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. “Preface.” In Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, by  Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, xi-xiv. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Penguin Books, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, Grit et al. “How Learning Shapes the Empathic Brain.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, ed. Susan T. Fiaske, 113, no. 1 (2016): 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbold, Sarah. “‘Dolores Disparue’: Reading Misogyny in Lolita.” In Approaches to Teaching Nabokov’s Lolita, edited by Zoran Kuzmanovich and Galya Diment, 134–140. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivry, Benjamin. “Vladimir Nabokov and the Jews.”Forward, May 14, 2013. http://forward.com/culture/176216/vladimir-nabokov-and-the-jews/.

  • Kuzmanovich, Zoran. “Materials.” In Approaches to Teaching Nabokov’s Lolita, edited by Zoran Kuzmanovich and Galya Diment, 3–23. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maar, Michael. The Two Lolitas. Translated by Perry Anderson. London: Verso, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majdandžić, Jasminka et al. “The Selfless Mind: How Prefrontal Involvement in Mentalizing with Similar and Dissimilar Others Shapes Empathy and Prosocial Behavior.” Cognition (2016): 24–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.003.

  • McGowan, John. Postmodernism and Its Critics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, Susan. “Lolita in History.” American Literature 75, no. 3 (2003): 629–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, Mónica G. and Emiko Saldívar Tanaka. “Comics, Dolls and the Disavowal of Racism: Learning from Mexican Mestizaje.” In Creolizing Europe: Legacies and Transformations, edited by Encarnación Gutiérrez Rodríguez and Shirley Anne Tate, 175–201. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabokov, Vladimir. The Annotated Lolita: Revised and Updated, edited by Alfred Appel, Jr. New York: Vintage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Bend Sinister. New York: Vintage, 1990, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Lectures on Literature. Edited by Fredson Bowers. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “On a Book Entitled Lolita.” In The Annotated Lolita: Revised and Updated, edited by Alfred Appel, Jr, 311–17. New York: Vintage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Speak, Memory: An Autobiography Revisited. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1995 [1966].

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Stories of Vladimir Nabokov. New York: Vintage Books, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Lance. Lolita: A Janus Text. Edited by Robert Lecker. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Primo. The Periodic Table. Translated by Raymond Rosenthal. New York: Schocken Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, James. “Estranging Unreliability, Bonding Unreliability, and the Ethics of Lolita.” Narrative, 15, no. 2 (2007): 222–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Living to Tell about It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration. Ithaca, NY: University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pino, Maria Chiara and Monica Mazza. “The Use of ‘Literary Fiction’ to Promote Mentalizing Ability.” PLoS One, 11, no. 8 (2016): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160254.

  • Pitzer, Andrea. The Secret History of Vladimir Nabokov. New York: Pegasus Books, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Carl. Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Stephanie D. and Frans B. M. de Waal. “Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25, no. 1 (2001): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, Stacy. Véra (Mrs. Vladimir Nabokov). New York: Random House, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, Friedrich. “On Grace and Dignity.” Translated by George Gregory. Schiller Institute, Inc., 1992 [1793]. https://www.schillerinstitute.org/educ/aesthetics/Schiller_On_Grace_and_Dignity.pdf.

  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003, 123–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, Ervin and Johanna Vollhardt. “Altruism Born of Suffering: The Roots of Caring and Helping After Victimization and Other Trauma.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 78, no. 3 (2008): 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theticklishpear. Down to the Kitchens (blog). http://theticklishpear.tumblr.com/post/120073772072/ defining-and-remedying-mary-suegary-stu-im.

  • Tikener, Christina. “Time in Lolita.” Modern Fiction Studies 25 (1979): 453–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toker, Leona. “Being Read by Lolita,” In Approaches to Teaching Nabokov’s Lolita, edited by Zoran Kuzmanovich and Galya Diment, 154–7. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Nabokov: The Mystery of Literary Structures. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomova, Livia et al. “Increased Neural Responses to Empathy for Pain Might Explain How Acute Stress Increases Prosociality.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2017): 401–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeule, Blakey. Why Do We Care About Literary Characters?. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, Graham. Chasing Lolita: How Popular Culture Corrupted Nabokov’s Little Girl All Over Again. Chicago, IL: Chicago Review Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Jennifer. “Was ‘Lolita’ About Race? Nabokov on Race in the United States.” Los Angeles Review of Books, Oct. 31, 2016. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/was-lolita-about-race-vladimir-nabokov-on-race-in-the-united-states/.

  • Yesudas, Esther H. and Tatia M. C. Lee. “The Role of Cingulate Cortex in Vicarious Pain.” Biomed Research International, vol. 2015 (2015): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wood, L. (2017). Affect and Fascism in Lolita . In: Wehrs, D., Blake, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63303-9_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics