Skip to main content

Open Rotator Cuff Repair

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rotator Cuff Injuries

Abstract

Open rotator cuff repair technique is safe and reproducible and can be done with a mini open technique. A systematic approach including adequate exposure, optimal cuff mobilization, and repair without unnecessary tension is essential for the best chances of success. The surgeon has numerous options for repairing the cuff including transosseous repair and suture anchor repair with either single-row or double-row techniques. There are multitudes of suture repair configurations, many of which work quite well. Key is that the cuff be repositioned as close as possible to its normal anatomical site and that the deltoid origin be repaired so that it heals back to the acromion. Lastly, as with other repair techniques, a supervised postoperative rehabilitation program is vital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mochizuki T, Sugaya H, Uomizu M, et al. Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomical findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:962–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fallon J, Blevins FT, Vogel K, Trotter J. Functional morphology of the supraspinatus tendon. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:920–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cole BJ, ElAttrache NS, Anbari A. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:662–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wakabayashi I, Itoi E, Sano H, et al. Mechanical environment of the supraspinatus tendon: a two-dimensional finite element model analysis. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2003;12:612–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Juul-Kristensen B, Bojsen-Moller F, Finsen L, et al. Muscle sizes and moment arms of rotator cuff muscles determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Cells Tissues Organs. 2000;167:214–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1861–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, et al. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:407–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:403–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wall LB, Keener JD, Brophy RH. Double-row vs single-row rotator cuff repair: a review of the biomechanical evidence. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2009;18:933–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wall LB, Keener JD, Brophy RH. Clinical outcomes of double-row versus single-row rotator cuff repairs. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:1312–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DeHaan AM, Axelrad TW, Kaye E, Silvestri L, Puskas B, Foster TE. Does double-row rotator cuff repair improve functional outcome of patients compared with single-row technique? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1176–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Millett PJ, Warth RJ, Dornan GJ, Lee JT, Spiegl UJ. Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23:586–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hein J, Reilly JM, Chae J, Maerz T, Anderson K. Retear rates after arthroscopic single-row, double-row, and suture bridge rotator cuff repair at a minimum of 1 year of imaging follow-up: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:2274–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ji X, Bi C, Wang F, Wang Q. Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Zwaal P, Thomassen BJ, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Lindenburg R, Swen JW, van Arkel ER. Clinical outcome in all-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair in small to medium-sized tears: a randomized controlled trial in 100 patients with 1-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Litchfield M.D., F.R.C.S.C .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gupta, A., Litchfield, R. (2018). Open Rotator Cuff Repair. In: McMahon, P. (eds) Rotator Cuff Injuries. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63668-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63668-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63666-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63668-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics