Skip to main content

Loving Violent Arabs: A Study of Radicalism Within the Israeli Messianic Movement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Expressions of Radicalization

Abstract

Steiner and Lundberg examine how Israeli Messianic leaders articulate the hope for peace in the Middle East. More specifically, they draw attention to how Messianic leaders understand the Middle Eastern conflicts and whether this understanding could be considered as radical. All of the informants underline the complexity of the conflicts and most of them tend to emphasize their permanence. The informants are pessimists regarding the conflict, half of them describe it in fatalist terms. This colours their hope for peace; they expect an escalation of the Middle Eastern conflicts, even the apocalypse. And lastly, the informants prefer a one-state solution. In comparison to the Israeli political mainstream, like Likud, the Messianic movement is not necessarily radical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Akiva Cohen ‘a growing polarization between more evangelical Messianic Jewish leaders and more Rabbinic/heritage positive Messianic Jewish leaders has been evident in recent leadership conflicts’ (Cohen 2013: 111).

  2. 2.

    This interviewee preferred to be anonymous.

  3. 3.

    This interviewee preferred to be anonymous.

  4. 4.

    Aliyah is the immigration of Jews living abroad to Israel .

  5. 5.

    In this study, the authors quoted the interviewees word by word. Grammatical mistakes might occur and are original.

  6. 6.

    There are a few deviant voices. When Interviewee 2 was asked about the commencement of the conflict, he presented a very different idea: ‘The conflict started when the Jewish people rejected Christ. …The issue is our enmity between us and God. Between Israel and its Messiah. That is the bottom-line, all the rest is a side effect’, and therefore he does not regard the Arabs as the main cause or origin of the conflict.

  7. 7.

    Agreeing with God regarding His Divine order.

  8. 8.

    Two interviewees gave stereotypical but benign images of Arabs. Bosharniko depicted Arabs as blessed by God and Ortiz depicted them as hardworking.

  9. 9.

    Dhimmi is a protected non-Muslim living in a non-Muslim state.

  10. 10.

    Howard Bass is the only one who does not marginalize the negative images of Israel and Judaism: ‘Israel is not a Christian country or non-Christian country; it is an anti-Christian country. Islam and Judaism are both anti-Jesus’.

  11. 11.

    Bosharniko was one of the Messianic leaders claiming to live in the present.

  12. 12.

    Regrettably, territorial concessions were never discussed during the interview with Ray Pritz.

  13. 13.

    Still, it must be said that none of the interviewees suggested ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians .

  14. 14.

    Thomas told us a story about how he consulted a Palestinian leader within the evangelical movement.

  15. 15.

    A detailed account of the principles behind these points of references is given in the introduction to this volume.

  16. 16.

    The coalition was dissolved again in 2014.

  17. 17.

    The Zionist Union is an Israeli centre-left political alliance, established in December 2014 by the Israeli Labour Party, Hatnuah, and the Green Movement.

  18. 18.

    Dispensationalism is a theological interpretative framework in which Israel plays a decisive and redemptive role before the return of Christ and world history is divided into seven distinct periods, called dispensations (Steiner and Lundberg 2015: 119).

References

Bibliography

  • Benn, A. 2016. The End of the Old Israel, How Netanyahu Has Transformed the Nation. Foreign Affairs, July/August, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. 2015. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carenen, C. 2012. The Fervent Embrace: Liberal Protestants, Evangelicals, and Israel. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cimino, R. 2005. ‘No God in Common:’ American Evangelical Discourse on Islam After 9/11. Religious Research Association 47 (2): 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. 2013. Messianic Jews in the Land of Israel. In Introduction to Messianic Judaism: Its Ecclesial Context and Biblical Foundations, ed. D. Rudolph and J. Willitts, 107–115. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn-Sherbok, D. 2000. Messianic Judaism. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Politics of Apocalypse: The History and Influence of Christian Zionism. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frykholm, A. Johnson. 2004. What Social and Political Messages Appear in the Left Behind Books? A Literary Discussion of Millenarian Fiction. In Rapture, Revelation, and the End Times, Exploring the Left Behind Series, ed. B. David Forbes and J. Halgren Kilde, 167–195. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kamphausen, E. 2013. Road Map zum Himmlischen Jerusalem, Judentum und Israel im Endzeitdenken des protestantischen Fundamentalismus [Road Map to Heavenly Jerusalem, Judaism and Israel in the End-time of Protestant Fundamentalism]. In Purity and Anger, Ethnicizing Religions in Fundamentalist Communities, ed. Andrea Zielinski, Erhard Kamphausen, and Vladimir Fedorov, 43–80. Münster: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleczewski, D., and R. Amossy. 2016. Pragmatic and Value-Based Argumentation in the 2015 Israeli Elections. Israel Affairs 22 (3–4): 772–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollontai, P. 2004. Messianic Jews and Jewish Identity. Journal of Modern Jewish Studies 3 (2): 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienesch, M. 1993. Redeeming America, Piety and Politics in the New Christian Right. Chapel Hill, NJ: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navot, D., and A. Rubin. 2016. Likud’s Success in the 2015 Elections, Netanyahu’s Hobbesian Moment. Israel Affairs 22 (3–4): 628–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, K. 2005. Ethnographic Methods. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seligmann, L.J. 2005. Ethnographic Methods. In Doing Research: Methods of Inquiry for Conflict Analysis, ed. Daniel Druckman, 229–254. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. 2016. Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.O. 2013. More Desired than Our Own Salvation, The Roots of Christian Zionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, S. 2009. Evangelicals and Israel, The Story of American Christian Zionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, K. 2013. War and Peace Theology in German and Swedish Christian Zionism. ID: International Dialogue, A Multidisciplinary Journal of World Affairs 3: 38–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, K., and A. Lundberg. 2015. Peace and End Time Expectations in Christian Zionism: A Qualitative Analysis of Swedish Christian Zionist Movements. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 28 (2): 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T.P. 2004. On the Road to Armageddon, How Evangelicals Became Israel’s Best Friend. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojcik, D. 1996. Embracing Doomsday, Faith, Fatalism, and Apocalyptic Beliefs in the Nuclear Age. Western Folklore 55 (4): 297–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Interviews

  • Bass, H. 2015. Interview at Nachalat Yeshua, Beer Sheva, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosharniko, S. 2015. Interview at Ruach HaChayim Congregation, Nazareth Illit, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueras, Y. 2015. Interview at the home of Joseph Finkelstein, Arad, Israel. Recording 2015-10-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, J. 2015. Interview at the home of Joseph Finkelstein, Arad, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interviewee 1. 2015. Interview in an urban area, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interviewee 2. 2015. Interview in an urban area, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasoff, D. 2015. Interview at University of the Holy Land in Jerusalem, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, E. 2015. Interview at Ruach HaChayim Congregation, Nazareth Illit, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, D. 2015a. Interview at the home of David and Leah Ortiz, Ariel, West Bank. Recorded 2015-10-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, L. 2015b. Interview at the home of David and Leah Ortiz, Ariel, West Bank. Recorded 2015-10-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritz, R. 2015. Interview at the home of Ray Pritz, Mevasseret Zion, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shany, L. 2015. Interview at Kehilat Haderech Congregation, Karmiel, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkoff, E. 2015. Interview at Kiryat Yam Messianic Congregation, Kiryat Yam, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syväntö, O. 2015. Interview at Nachalat Yeshua, Beer Sheva, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. 2015. Interview at Beit Asaph Congregation, Netanya, Israel. Recorded 2015-10-20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Steiner, K., Lundberg, A.P. (2018). Loving Violent Arabs: A Study of Radicalism Within the Israeli Messianic Movement. In: Steiner, K., Önnerfors, A. (eds) Expressions of Radicalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65566-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics