Skip to main content

Aligning Business Models with Requirements Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 299))

Abstract

There is a widespread agreement of the business models’ importance to represent the economic point of view of a company in a value model. Such value models are core for the successful alignment of a business and its information systems, and they can be used as input of the software requirements specification process. However, creating requirements models, such as goal-oriented models or use cases, aligned with value models is a time consuming and error-prone task. Automating the construction of more refined models from more abstract ones, can contribute to accelerate the software development cycle and increase the developer’s productivity. This paper offers a systematic approach to automatically generate goal-oriented models from value models. This is achieved by both defining conceptual mappings between value models and goal-oriented models and using model-driven techniques to define automatic transformations between both types of models. We have used our approach in several case studies and the results show that our approach reduces the requirements engineer effort to build goal-oriented models and ensure the alignment between business and IT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Software requirements specifications are created in the initial stages of information systems’ development describing the software system to be developed.

  2. 2.

    A mind map is a type of cognitive map used to view, classify and organize concepts, and to generate new ideas in a straightforward and intuitive way [6].

  3. 3.

    The direction is set based on the environment actor.

  4. 4.

    GRL had the same four concepts mapped, however, as the graphical representation of these concepts is similar to iStar, the same transformation scheme can be used to both goal-oriented models.

  5. 5.

    The proof-of-concept tool can be found at https://goo.gl/9paig7.

References

  1. Rasiwasia, A.: Meta model for business model design: designing a meta model for E3 value model based on MOF. Master’s thesis, Stockholm, Sweden (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., van Vliet, H.: Business modelling is not process modelling. In: Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2000. LNCS, vol. 1921, pp. 40–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). doi:10.1007/3-540-45394-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. White, S.A.: Introduction to BPMN. IBM Cooperation (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gordijn, J.: Value-based requirements engineering. Ph.D. thesis, May 2002

    Google Scholar 

  5. Souza, E., Abrahao, S., Moreira, A., Araújo, J., Insfran, E.: Comparing value-driven methods: an experiment design. In: HuFaMo 2016 Held in MODELS, Saint Malo, France (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buzan, T., Buzan, B.: The Mind Map Book (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy, W.E.: The REA accounting model: a generalized framework for account-ing systems in a shared data environment. Account. Rev. 57, 554–578 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson, B., et al.: Towards a reference ontology for business models. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2006. LNCS, vol. 4215, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11901181_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: Requirements Engineering Conference – RE 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sci. Comput. Program. 20(1–2), 3–50 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Loucopoulos, P., Kavakli, V., Prekas, N., Rolland, C., Grosz, G., Nurcan, S.: Using the EKD approach: the modelling component (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. OMG: Business Motivation Model (BMM) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu, E., Giorgini, P., Maiden, N., Mylopoulos, J.: Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly, T., Weaver, R.: The goal structuring notation – a safety argument notation. In: Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop on Assurance Cases (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chung, L., Nixon, B.A., Yu, E.S.K., Mylopoulos, J.: Non-functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Springer, Boston (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Anton, A.I.: Goal-based requirements analysis. In: RE 1996, pp. 136–144. IEEE (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Borgida, A., Ernst, N., Jureta, I., Lapouchnian, A.: Techne: a(nother) requirements modeling language. In: ICSE 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amyot, D., Horkoff, J., Gross, D., Mussbacher, G.: A lightweight GRL profile for i* modeling. In: Heuser, C.A., Pernul, G. (eds.) ER 2009. LNCS, vol. 5833, pp. 254–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04947-7_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Fayoumi, A., Kavakli, E., Loucopoulos, P.: Towards a unified meta-model for goal oriented modelling. In: EMCIS 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mussbacher, G., et al.: The relevance of model-driven engineering thirty years from now. In: Dingel, J., Schulte, W., Ramos, I., Abrahão, S., Insfran, E. (eds.) MODELS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8767, pp. 183–200. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11653-2_12

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kolovos, D.S., Matragkas, N., Williams, J.R., Paige, R.F.: Model driven grant proposal engineering. In: Dingel, J., Schulte, W., Ramos, I., Abrahão, S., Insfran, E. (eds.) MODELS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8767, pp. 420–432. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11653-2_26

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidt, D.C.: Guest editor’s introduction: model-driven engineering. IEEE Comput. 39(2), 25–31 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Almeida, J.P.A.: Model-driven design of distributed applications. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Corsaro, A. (eds.) OTM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3292, pp. 854–865. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_99

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh, Y., Sood, M.: Model driven architecture: a perspective. In: Advance Computing Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kleppe, A.G., Warmer, J.B., Bast, W.: MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wanderley, F., Araújo, J.: Generating goal-oriented models from creative requirements using model driven engineering. In: MoDRE 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gronback, R.C.: Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Toolkit. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. RespectIT: A KAOS Tutorial. v1.0 edn, October 2007

    Google Scholar 

  29. Horkoff, J., Yu, E.: I-Star Wiki (2017). http://istar.rwth-aachen.de

  30. Huemer, C., Schmidt, A., Werthner, H.: A UML profile for the e3-value e-business model ontology. In: BUSITAL 2008 Held in CAiSE 2008 Conference (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dwivedi, V., Kulkarni, N.: A model driven service identification approach for process centric systems. In: IEEE Congress on Services Part 2 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Inaganti, S., Behara, G.K.: Service Identification: BPM and SOA Handshake (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koliadis, G., Ghose, A.: Relating business process models to goal-oriented requirements models in KAOS. In: Hoffmann, A., Kang, B.-h., Richards, D., Tsumoto, S. (eds.) PKAW 2006. LNCS, vol. 4303, pp. 25–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11961239_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Gordijn, J., Yu, E.S.K., van der Raadt, B.: e-Service design using i* and e3value modeling. IEEE Softw. 23(3), 26–33 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Weigand, H., Johannesson, P., Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M.: Value-based service modeling and design: toward a unified view of services. In: Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 410–424. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the NOVA LINCS Research Laboratory (Ref. UID/CEC/04516/2013), and Programa Ciência sem Fronteiras - CAPES (Ref. 99999.009047/2013-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Souza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Souza, E., Moreira, A., Araújo, J. (2017). Aligning Business Models with Requirements Models. In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 299. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65929-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65930-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics