Skip to main content

Polarization in Blogging About the Paris Meeting on Climate Change

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10539))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

To what extent was the blogging about the recent Paris meeting on climate change polarized? This paper addresses this question by way of a series of analyses of a comprehensive corpus of English language blog posts about the negotiations to reach an agreement to mitigate climate change. We identify two groups of bloggers, the engaged bloggers and the contrarian bloggers and use the contents of their blog posts and the patterns in their linking to sources to characterize and compare the two groups. The paper combines computational methods and manual analyses and uses co-citation networks in an innovative way to characterize and compare the contexts of the linking in the two groups. We address challenges that using computational methods to study polarization in blogs raises. We argue that the ideological profiles of the sources the blogs link to are clear signals of polarization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adamic, L.: The social link. In: Turow, J., Tsui, L. (eds.) The Hyperlinked Society, pp. 227–248. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adamic, L., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, KDD 2005, pp. 36–43 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bakshy, E., Messing, E., Adamic, L., et al.: Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook. Science 348, 1130–1132 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. British National Corpus homepage. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/

  5. COP21, Wikipepedia article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_Nations_Climate_Change_Conference

  6. Dunlap, R.E., McCright, M.J.: Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek, J.S., Norgaard, R.B., Schlosberg, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford University Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elgesem, D., Steskal, L., Diakopoulos, N.: Structure and content of the discourse on climate change in the blogosphere: the big picture. Environ. Commun. 9(2), 169–188 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Isenberg, D.J.: Group polarization: a critical review and meta-analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50, 1141–1151 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiske, S.T., Taylor, S.E.: Social Cognition – from Brains to Culture. SAGE, Los Angeles (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guera, P.H.C., et al.: A measure of polarization on social media networks based on community boundaries. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Himelboim, I., et al.: Birds of a feather tweet together: integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 18(2), 40–60 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hulme, M.: Why We Disagree About Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Lodge, M., Taber, C.S.: Motivated political reasoning. In: The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013). (Chapter 7)

    Google Scholar 

  14. iGraph (2017). http://igraph.org/r/

  15. Mallet (2017).https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mallet/mallet.pdf

  16. Mann, M.E.: The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars. Columbia University Press, New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Salway, A., Elgesem, D., Hofland, K., Reigem, Ø., Steskal, L.: Topically-focused blog corpora for multiple languages. In: Proceedings of the 10th Web as Corpus Workshop (WAC-X) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sharman, A.: Mapping the climate sceptical blogosphere. Glob. Environ. Change 26, 159–170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sunstein, C.: #republic. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Turner, J.C., et al.: Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Basil Blackwell, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Washingthon, H., Cook, J.: Climate Change Denial. Earthscan, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wordsmith homepage. http://www.lexically.net/wordsmith/

  23. Yardi, S., Boyd, D.: Dynamic debates: an analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 30(5), 316–327 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dag Elgesem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7, 8, 9 and 10.

Table 7. Key-ness analysis of topic “Paris meeting”
Table 8. Titles of contrarian blog posts that link to the unfccc.int-website
Table 9. Titles of 25 randomly selected posts from the skeptical group. 24 blog posts are rejecting the negotiations, one is not.
Table 10. Titles of the 21 blog posts in the overlap between the contrarian group and the engaged group. Fifteen posts reject the rationale of the negotiations, six do not.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elgesem, D. (2017). Polarization in Blogging About the Paris Meeting on Climate Change. In: Ciampaglia, G., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67216-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67217-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics