Skip to main content

Empirical Studies on Bankers, Legislators, and Political Parties, 1790–1859

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Partisan Banking to Open Access

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Economic History ((PEHS))

  • 317 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides the major empirical contribution of this dissertation. Qian defines elites as bankers who had been or would become state legislators at some point of their life. Qian collects data on bank directors and state legislators from 1790 to 1860 to identify the affiliation between bankers, political parties, and state legislators. Over 70% of the bank presidents and bank directors before 1812 had been or would become state legislators. Moreover, most of those banker/legislators were associated with the Federalist Party, and very few were Democratic-Republicans. The stock of directors shows that from 1797 to 1811, many directors remained Federalist, despite the fact that Democratic-Republicans strength in the legislature kept rising. However, in 1812, the proportion of bank directors that had been Democratic-Republican legislators jumped from almost zero to 24%. Ordinary Least Squares, Logit, and Probit regressions show that the probability of a bank director being a Democratic-Republican legislator increased by more than 20% after 1811, with no significant change in the probability of being a Federalist legislator. These results reveal a shift in strategy by Federalists, who extended banking privileges to their political rivals, as a direct result of the threat of charter revocation in 1811. In addition, this chapter shows that while the connection between legislators and bankers dropped after 1812, legislators and bankers nevertheless continued to be closely connected: Even in the 1850s, 40–50% of all bank presidents and bank directors served in the state legislature at some point in time. Despite the continuing connection, limited partisan access to banking never returned in the second party system. After 1820, banking was still dominated by elites, but access to banking was no longer limited by political affiliation. Bankers were still much wealthier than the average citizen and were much more likely to become state legislators, but were no longer connected with a particular party.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Acemoglu, Daron, and James Robinson. Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, Michael J. Party affiliations in the state legislatures: a year by year summary, 1796–2006. McFarland & Company, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Formisano, Ronald P. The transformation of political culture: Massachusetts parties, 1790s–1840s. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Paul. The Democratic-Republicans of Massachusetts: politics in a young republic. Greenwood Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Michael F. The rise and fall of the American Whig Party. New York: Oxford University Press. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux, Naomi R. Insider lending: Banks, personal connections, and economic development in industrial New England. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Anson Ely. The Federalist Party in Massachusetts to the year 1800. University Library, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglas, John J. Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. “Violence and social orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history.” Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, William Alexander. Jeffersonian Democracy in New England. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1916.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Lu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lu, Q. (2017). Empirical Studies on Bankers, Legislators, and Political Parties, 1790–1859. In: From Partisan Banking to Open Access. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67645-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67645-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67644-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67645-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics