Abstract
The Modern Synthesis in evolutionary biology took place in two major phases from the 1920s through the 1940s. It achieved a reconciliation between the original Darwinism and the newly discovered Mendelism, which gave birth to the field of population genetics, the mathematical core of evolutionary theory. Since that time, the field has further evolved, encompassing entirely new areas of inquiry, leading to new empirical findings, and developing new conceptual tools. In the 1960s, for instance, the invention of gel electrophoresis made it possible for the first time to directly estimate gene frequencies in natural populations. While developmental biology was initially still excluded from the synthesis, in the 1980s new techniques led to the emergence of the field of evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo). The parallel molecular revolution unfolded initially independently of evolutionary studies, until the turn of the twenty-first century, when genomics became “comparative” in nature and began importing techniques from phylogenetic analysis. The reevaluation of phenomena like phenotypic plasticity and epigenetic inheritance led to a rebirth of interest in the complexities of the genotype–phenotype map, triggering the formulation of concepts like robustness, modularity, and evolvability. Paleontology came roaring back with the theory of punctuated equilibria in the 1970s and 1980s. These many strands brought about the need for a further expansion of evolutionary theory, catalyzing discussions concerning a possible Extended Synthesis. “Darwinism” has never been more alive and pregnant with opportunities for both theoretical advancements and philosophical reflection.
Notes
- 1.
See Loison and Herring (2017) about the surprising persistence of neo-Lamarckian ideas in France.
- 2.
For those interested in a closer look, a new website has been launched to track the development of research and to foster outreach activities concerning the EES (http://extendedevolutionarysynthesis.com/).
- 3.
Their paper is focused on four specific areas: evo-devo, developmental plasticity, what they call inclusive inheritance, and niche construction.
References
Alberch P (1991) From genes to phenotypes: dynamical systems and evolvability. Genetics 84:5–11
Alcock J (2017) The behavioral sciences and sociobiology: a Darwinian approach. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 37–60
Bowler PJ (1983) The eclipse of Darwinism: anti-Darwinian evolution theories in the decades around 1900. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Bowler PJ (2003) Evolution: the history of an idea. University of California Press, Oakland
Bowler PJ (2017) Alternatives to Darwinism in the early twentieth century. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 195–218
Caetano-Anollés G (ed) (2010) Evolutionary genomics and systems biology. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
Coulter JM (1915) A suggested explanation of orthogenesis in plants. Science 42:859–863
Darwin C (1859) The origin of species by means of natural selection; or the preservation of favoured Racesn in the struggle for life. http://tinyurl.com/oyadykh. Accessed 26 Oct 2016
Delisle RG (2017) From Charles Darwin to the evolutionary synthesis: weak and diffused connections only. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 133–168
Depew DJ (2017) Darwinism in the 20th century: productive encounters with saltation, acquired characteristics, and development. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 61–88
Depew DJ, Weber BH (2011) The fate of Darwinism: evolution after the modern synthesis. Biol Theor 6:89–102
Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York
Dobzhansky T (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 35:125–129
Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJM (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, pp 82–115
Esposito M (2017) The organismal synthesis: holistic science and developmental evolution in the english-speaking world, 1915–1954. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 219–242
Fisher RA (1930) The genetically theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gavrilets S (1999) A dynamical theory of speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. Am Nat 154:1–22
Goldschmidt R (1940) The material basis of evolution. Yale University Press, Yale
Gould SJ (1985) Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gould SJ, Eldredge N (1977) Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3:115–151
Haeckel EHP (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine Grundzüge der Organischen Formen-wissenschaft, Mechanisch Begründet Durch die von Charles Darwin Reformirte Descendenztheorie. G. Reimer. https://archive.org/details/generellemorphol01haec. Accessed 4 Nov 2016
Haldane JBS (1932) The causes of evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hoelzer GA, Smith E, Pepper JW (2006) On the logical relationship between natural selection and self-organization. J Evol Biol 19:1785–1794
Huxley JS (1942) Evolution: the modern synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (1999) Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: the Lamarckian dimension. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimension: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, Cambridge
Jablonski D (2000) Micro- and macroevolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology. Paleobiology 26:15–52
Jablonski D (2005) Evolutionary innovations in the fossil record: the intersection of ecology, development, and macroevolution. J Exp Zool 304B:504–519
Jablonski D (2008) Species selection: theory and data. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:501–524
Jablonski D, Shubin NH (2015) The future of the fossil record: paleontology in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:4852–4858
Jordan DS (1920) Orthogenesis among fishes. Science 52:13–14
Kaplan JM (2006) More misuses of evolutionary psychology. Metascience 15:177–181
Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kirschner MW, Gerhart JC (2005) The plausibility of life: resolving Darwin’s Dilemma. Yale University Press, Yale
Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kutschera U (2017) Symbiogenesis and cell evolution: an anti-Darwinian research agenda? In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 302–332
Laland K, Sterelny K (2006) Seven reasons (not) to neglect niche construction. Evolution 60:1751–1762
Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M, Sterelny K, Muller GB et al (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 514:161–164. http://tinyurl.com/myohvp2. Accessed 26 Oct 2016
Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M, Sterelny K, Muller GB et al (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions, and predictions. Proc R Soc B 282. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019
Levit GS, Hossfeld U (2017) Major research traditions in 20th century evolutionary biology: the relations of Germany’s Darwinism with them. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 169–194
Lewis EB (1978) A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276:565–570
Lewontin RC, Hubby JL (1966) A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54:595–609
Lipman CB (1922) Orthogenesis in bacteria. Am Nat 56:105–115
Loison L, Herring E (2017) Lamarckian research programs in French biology (1900–1970). In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 243–270
Love A (2006) Evolutionary morphology and evo-devo: hierarchy and novelty. Theor Biosci 124:317–333
Lynch M (2007) The origins of genome architecture. Sinauer, Sunderland
Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York
Müller GB (2007) Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nat Rev Genet 8:943–949
Newman SA, Gabor F, Muller GB (2006) Before programs: the physical origination of multicellular forms. Int J Dev Biol 50:289–299
Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the levels of selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Otha T (2002) Near-neutrality in evolution of genes and gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16134–16137
Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Pigliucci M (2007) Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution 61:2743–2749
Pigliucci M (2008a) What, if anything, is an evolutionary novelty? Philos Sci 75:887–898
Pigliucci M (2008b) Is evolvability evolvable? Nat Rev Genet 9:75–82
Pigliucci M (2016) Progress in science. Plato’s Footnote. http://tinyurl.com/PlatoFootnote1, http://tinyurl.com/PlatoFootnote2, http://tinyurl.com/PlatoFootnote3. Accessed 26 Oct 2016
Pigliucci M, Muller GB (eds) (2010) Evolution – the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge
Prud’homme B, Gompel N, Carroll SB (2007) Emerging principles of regulatory evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8605–8612
Real LA, Brown JH (1991) Foundations of ecology. Classic papers with commentaries. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rollo CD (1995) Phenotypes: their epigenetics, ecology and evolution. Chapman & Hall, London
Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1998) Phenotype evolution, a reaction norm perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland
Shanahan T (2017) Selfish genes and lucky breaks: Richard Dawkins’ and Stephen Jay Gould’s: divergent Darwinian agendas. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 11–36
Simpson GG (1944) Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New York
Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York
Tiselius A (1937) A new apparatus for electrophoretic analysis of colloidal mixtures. Trans Faraday Soc 33:524–531
Turner DD (2017) Paleobiology’s uneasy relationship with the Darwinian tradition: stasis as data. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 333–352
Wagner GP, Zhang J (2011) The pleiotropic structure of the genotype-phenotype map: the evolvability of complex organisms. Nat Rev Genet 12:204–213
Watson JD, Crick FHC (1953) Molecular structure of nucleic acids. Nature 171:737–738
Weissman A (1893) The germ-plasm: a theory of heredity. Charles Scribner’s Sons. http://tinyurl.com/gq9m765. Accessed 26 Oct 2016
West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Cambridge
Wilson DS, Wilson EO (2008) Evolution ‘for the good of the group’. Am Sci 96:380–389
Winther RG (2015) The structure of scientific theories. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structure-scientific-theories/. Accessed 26 Oct 2016
Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pi+gliucci, M. (2017). Darwinism After the Modern Synthesis. In: Delisle, R. (eds) The Darwinian Tradition in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69123-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69123-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69121-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69123-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)