Skip to main content

Open-Access Journals: The Future of Scientific Publishing?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Medical Writing and Research Methodology for the Orthopaedic Surgeon

Abstract

The open-access publishing initiative started in the 1990s with the introduction of the World Wide Web that made the Internet available around the globe. The open-access publishing concept entails that scientific content is provided online to readers, free of charge. The “Public Library of Science” (PloS) was one of the first nonprofit open-access platforms launched with tremendous success in the early twenty-first century. Open-access publishing provides several unprecedented advantages compared to standard print journals. This includes the timely, unrestricted, free access to scientific knowledge by any reader with access to the Internet, by eliminating financial barriers related to expensive journal subscriptions and by reducing the usual time delay of several months (or years) from the time a scientific discovery is made until the information is available to the end user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bernstein P, Cohen B, MacCallum C, Parthasarathy H, Patterson M, Siegel V. PLoS Biology – we’re open. PLoS Biol. 2003;1:E34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Eckdahl T. Review of: PLoS Biology – a freely available, open access online journal. Cell Biol Educ. 2004;3:15–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC, Masuzzo P, Collister LB, Hartgerink CH. The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review. F1000 Res. 2016;5:632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. https://publicaccess.nih.gov/policy.htm. Accessed 4 Dec 2016.

  5. Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Björk BC, Hedlund T. The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20961.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Stahel PF, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D, Smith WR. A new journal devoted to patient safety in surgery: the time is now! Patient Saf Surg. 2007;1:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. www.pssjournal.com. Accessed 4 Dec 2016.

  8. Stahel PF, Smith WR, Hahnloser D, Nigri G, Mauffrey C, Clavien PA. The 5th anniversary of ‘Patient Safety in Surgery’ – from the journal’s origin to its future vision. Patient Saf Surg. 2012;6:24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error – the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;353:i2139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stahel PF, VanderHeiden T, Kim F. Why do surgeons continue to perform unnecessary surgery? Patient Saf Surg. 2017. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  11. www.biomedcentral.com. Accessed 4 Dec 2016.

  12. Papadimos TJ, Grabarczyk JL, Grum DF, Hofmann JP, Marco AP, Khuder SA. Implementation of an antibiotic nomogram improves postoperative antibiotic utilization and safety in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Patient Saf Surg. 2007;1:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore JB, Hasenboehler EA. Orchiectomy as a result of ischemic orchitis after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: case report of a rare complication. Patient Saf Surg. 2007;1:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss HR. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis – case report of a patient with clinical deterioration after surgery. Patient Saf Surg. 2007;1:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ten Hagen A, Doldersum P, van Raaij T. Anaphylactic shock during cement implantation of a total hip arthroplasty in a patient with underlying mastocytosis: case report of a rare intraoperative complication. Patient Saf Surg. 2016;10:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Boumil MM, Salem DN. In… and out: open access publishing in scientific journals. Qual Manag Health Care. 2014;23:133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Voronov AA, Gerasimov AN, Koroleva AM, Kitas GD. The pressure to publish more and the scope of predatory publishing activities. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31:1874–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fountain H. Science journal pulls 60 papers in peer-review fraud. The New York Times, July 11, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stahel PF, Moore EE. Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system. BMC Med. 2014;12:179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Stahel PF, Clavien PA, Smith WR, Moore EE. Redundant publications in surgery: a threat to patient safety? Patient Saf Surg. 2008;2:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Both authors are editors on the editorial board of the open-access journal “Patient Safety in Surgery.” The authors declare no other conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip F. Stahel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stahel, P.F., VanderHeiden, T. (2018). Open-Access Journals: The Future of Scientific Publishing?. In: Mauffrey, C., Scarlat, M. (eds) Medical Writing and Research Methodology for the Orthopaedic Surgeon. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69350-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69350-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69349-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69350-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics