Skip to main content

The Epidural in Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards the Humanisation of Birth

Abstract

This chapter presents a historical introduction to birth analgesia and the influence of scientific and medical discourse on understandings of women’s bodies, influencing the ways in which women themselves can frame their own corporeal knowledge. Here, the process of birth, and how it is understood within Western cultural discourses, is investigated more thoroughly. We highlight the influence of biomedicine as a dominant birth discourse and explore current medical knowledge about epidural analgesia, exposing some of the assumptions behind evidence-based medicine and technology use.

JUNO

I was just really active, trying to get it progressing

And then when they kind of started getting painful

I started squatting and moving

Just through the contractions

And in the intense part, just powered through.

I don’t know—got impatient and I yelled a lot.

It’s a good release

Think I almost bit him at one point.

He was like ‘Do you remember trying to bite me?’

And I was like ‘Yeah I think I do’

And he was amazed at how—

Cause I think the other two labours I have been very, like

‘I don’t need any support’, like

‘Don’t touch me’ kind of thing

But with this one,

Near the end

It was like ‘I need you’

I was like ‘You need to be here’.

But it was a little bit longer than that this time,

So he had to put in some harder yards,

But he was like ‘Wow the strength!’

He goes ‘That was the first time I’ve ever felt that you were actually stronger than me!’

But no pain relief and no pain relief after actually either,

So I didn’t tear or anything like that.

Yeah, so no water but I like feeling really grounded,

Like, attached to the ground.

I was on all fours, because

I really wanted to be on the ground.

I was on all fours on the bed because,

Obviously it’s more comfortable.

It’s a very hard floor in there,

Even then I was like ‘I want to be on the floor’,

Just letting gravity do all that.

Yeah no water,

I didn’t even have a shower or anything,

Just kept moving around.

Yeah it’s been interesting reflecting,

Near the end I was getting really impatient.

I was like ‘Just get out!’

You know, I was just over it.

And I was like ‘Wow, some women do this for a lot longer’

And so I can understand why you would reach for those things.

I think I felt a little bit more of that,

Just that intensity, and that pain and just wanting it to all be over.

Whereas with the others,

Because that last stage was quite quick,

You just don’t have any time to even contemplate it.

Whereas this time I felt like, you know,

I didn’t contemplate it but I definitely got impatient.

I was like ‘Come on I have had enough!’

And yeah, because every contraction was a bit more painful

And it didn’t feel like there was an outcome coming in the near future

I think I could relate to that a little bit more.

I was still going ‘Yes this is all good and it’s coming’.

I knew it was coming

It just felt a lot longer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Technically an anaesthetic, in that they entail anaesthetic drugs and are administered by anaesthetists; the terms ‘epidural analgesia’ and ‘epidural anaesthesia’ are often used interchangeably. Usually, it is the purpose of the drug that denotes whether it is described as analgesia (pain relief) or anaesthesia (surgical anaesthetic), and it is for this reason that we use the term analgesia throughout this book, as we are primarily interested in the use of epidural as an analgesic agent.

  2. 2.

    What we mean by the term ‘routine’ is that epidural analgesia is readily available in most hospital labour wards; that is, its use is not restricted or limited.

  3. 3.

    Although this was written almost 20 years ago, as a physiological event, birth could remain fairly unchanged, arguments about increasing maternal age or obesity notwithstanding.

  4. 4.

    By ‘intuition’ Descartes did not mean ‘either perception or imagination’, but ‘the clear vision of the intellect’: that is, reason (Lindsay 1937, p. xiv).

  5. 5.

    Translated in this volume as ‘I am thinking, therefore I exist’.

  6. 6.

    Lindsay (1937, p. xiii) sees the cause of this dualism as the discord between Descartes’ search for reason and his absolute faith in God: a dichotomy that resulted in the contemplation of ‘two entirely disparate worlds’.

  7. 7.

    Martin (1989) also cites Laqueur here.

  8. 8.

    Although menstruation may have been thought of as unclean and impure, it was still considered a normal physiological process (Martin 1989, p. 31).

  9. 9.

    Women were intensely involved in primary production before industrialisation, including farming, textiles, gardening, and food production (Miles 1989, pp. 154–155; Rich 1986, pp. 44–50).

  10. 10.

    See Odent (1999) and Buckley (2015) for a further examination of hormonal interplay of labour and birth. Interestingly, Martin wrote in 1989 and still these are not being realised in many hospital labour wards.

  11. 11.

    Ehrenreich and English (1979, p. 34) cite a petition by doctors to the English Parliament ‘asking the imposition of fines and “long imprisonment” on any woman who attempted to “use the practyse of Fisyk [medicine]”’.

  12. 12.

    Reading original source material (cited in secondary sources) is particularly eye opening in its misogynist detail. For example, the authors of The Malleus Maleficarum also state: ‘What else is a woman but a foe to friendship, an unescapable punishment, a necessary evil, a natural temptation, a desirable calamity, a domestic danger, a delectable detriment, an evil of nature, painted with fair colours!’ (Kramer and Sprenger, in Chauhan 2005, p. 2). How can we focus clearly on current issues for midwifery and birthing women if this history, and its impact on birth knowledge and practice, is not acknowledged?

  13. 13.

    The 2011 edition contains a new finding—increased risk of caesarean section for foetal distress—although there is still no significant increased risk for caesarean section overall. Of the 38 studies included in the review, 33 compared epidural with opiates.

  14. 14.

    Little is known about the subtle hormonal interplays that occur in the mother–newborn dyad, in part because this has not been a priority in medical research (evidenced by its non-appearance in the biomedical literature). However, the research that is being done suggests that these hormonal responses are essential for the wellbeing of human beings, and of society in general (Odent 1999; Uvnäs-Moberg 2003). It is imperative, therefore, that those working in the area of maternity care are aware of, and can support these processes where possible.

  15. 15.

    Many of the studies on epidural analgesia are undertaken by anaesthetists and compare either the analgesic properties and effects on motor block of various combinations of medications to be used in epidurals or compare epidural with parenteral opioids. The plethora of studies concerning anaesthetic intricacies of epidural medications and dosages are beyond the scope of our review.

  16. 16.

    For example, Leap and Anderson (2008, p. 41) give examples of the ‘purpose of pain’ in labour, which include that it: marks the occasion, summons support, heightens joy, is a transition to motherhood, reinforces triumph, and triggers neurohormonal cascades.

References

  • Adams, J., Frawley, J., Steel, A., Broom, A., & Sibbritt, D. (2015). Use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological labour pain management techniques and their relationship to maternal and infant birth outcomes: Examination of a nationally representative sample of 1835 pregnant women. Midwifery, 31(4), 458–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfirevic, Z., Devane, D., Gyte, G. M. L., & Cuthbert, A. (2017). Continuous Cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of Electronic Fetal Monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2), Art. No: CD006066. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3.

  • Amedee Peret, F. (2013). Pain management for women in labour: An overview of systematic reviews. Updated RHL commentary (last revised: 1 March 2013). Geneva: World Health Organization. Viewed 27 Sept 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anim-Somuah, M., Smyth, R., & Howell, C. (2011). Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (12), Art. No: CD000331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3.

  • Anscombe, E., & Geach, P. (Eds.). (1964). Descartes: Philosophical writings. London: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arney, W. R. (1982). Power and the profession of obstetrics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2016). Australia’s mothers and babies 2014 – in brief (Perinatal statistics series No. 32. Cat No. PER 87). Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, H., Singer, M., & Susser, I. (1997). Medical anthropology and the world system: A critical perspective. London: Bergin/Harvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S., Choi, P., Henshaw, C., & Tree, J. (2005). ‘I felt as though I’d been in jail’: Women’s experiences of maternity care during labour, delivery and the immediate postpartum. Feminism & Psychology, 15(3), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, A. C. (1999). Birth chairs, midwives, and medicine. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, L. (2008). A feminist history of Australian midwifery from colonisation until the 1980s. Women and Birth, 21(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. (1997). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In K. Conboy, N. Medina, & S. Stanbury (Eds.), Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, C., Zadoroznyj, M., Hallgrimsdottir, H., Treloar, A., & Taylor, K. (2010). Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provisions: The evidence from Canada and Australia. Social Science and Medicine, 71, 475–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, T., & Seabrook, J. (1993). The revolt against change: Towards a conserving radicalism. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohren, M. A., Hofmeyr, G. J., Sakala, C., Fukuzawa, R. K., & Cuthbert, A. (2017). Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (7), Art. No: CD003766. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6.

  • Brown, S., & Lumley, J. (1998). Maternal health after childbirth: Results of an Australian population based survey. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 105(2), 156–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, S. (2015). Hormonal physiology of childbearing: Evidence and implications for women, babies, and maternity care. Washington, DC: Childbirth Connection. http://www.childbirthconnection.org/. Viewed Dec 2017.

  • Campo, M. (2014). Delivering hegemony: Contemporary childbirth discourses and obstetric hegemony in Australia. PhD thesis, School of Social Sciences and Communications, La Trobe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, R. J., & Foster, D. (2014). Negotiating risky bodies: Childbirth and constructions of risk. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, R. (2005). “…And he shall rule over thee” the malleus maleficarum and the politics of misogyny, medicine, and midwifery (1484–Present): A feminist historical inquiry. Master’s thesis, Department of Criminology, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cluett, E. R., & Burns, E. (2009). Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2). Art. No: CD000111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub3.

  • Cohen, S. (1999). Labor epidural analgesia: Back to the dark ages or a potential win-win situation? International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 8, 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, C. (2001). Enjoy your childbirth: The epidural option. Sydney: Law Placings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Improving maternity services in Australia: A discussion paper from the Australian government. Canberra. ISBN: 1-74186-833-5, Online ISBN: 1-74186-834-3, Publications Number: P3-4946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G., MacArthur, C., Wilson, M., Moore, P., & Shennan, A. (2010). Satisfaction, control and pain relief: Short- and long-term assessments in a randomised controlled trial of low-dose and traditional epidurals and a non-epidural comparison group. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 19, 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creedy, D. K., Shochet, I. M., & Horsfall, J. (2000). Childbirth and the development of acute trauma symptoms: Incidence and contributing factors. Birth, 27(2), 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowhurst, J., & Plaat, F. (2000). Labor analgesia for the twenty-first century. Seminars in Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain, 19(3), 164–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cwikel, J. (2008). Lessons from Semmelweis: A social epidemiologic update on safe motherhood. Social Medicine, 3(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. (2008). ‘She did what she could…’ childbirth and midwifery practice in Queensland 1859–1912. Coopers Plains: Book Pal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Floyd, R. (2008). Foreword. In S. Downe (Ed.), Normal childbirth: Evidence and debate (2nd ed., pp. ix–xiv). Sydney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Declercq, E. R., Sakala, C., Corry, M. P., Applebaum, S., & Herrlich, A. (2013). Listening to mothers III: Pregnancy and birth. New York: Childbirth Connection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health NSW. (2010). Maternity – Towards normal birth in NSW (Cat. No. PD2010_045). Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietsch, E., Davies, C., Shackleton, P., Alston, M., & McLeod, M. (2008). ‘Luckily we had a torch’: Contemporary birthing experiences of women living in rural and remote NSW. New South Wales: Charles Sturt University. http://bahsl.com.au/old/pdf/birthing-in-rural-remote-NSW.pdf. Viewed Dec 2017.

  • Donellan-Fernandez, R. (2011). Having a baby in Australia: Women’s business, risky business, or big business? Outskirts Online Journal, 24. http://www.outskirts.arts.uwa.edu.au/volumes/volume-24/donnellan-fernandez. Viewed Dec 2017.

  • Donnison, J. (1988). Midwives and medical men: A history of the struggle for the control of childbirth. London: Historical Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove, S., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2014). Being safe practitioners and safe mothers: A critical ethnography of continuity of care midwifery in Australia. Midwifery, 30(10), 1063–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downe, S. (Ed.). (2008). Normal childbirth: Evidence and debate. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downe, S., & McCourt, C. (2008). From being to becoming: Reconstructing childbirth knowledges. In S. Downe (Ed.), Normal childbirth: Evidence and debate (2nd ed., pp. 3–27). Sydney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drysdale, S., & Muir, H. (2002). New techniques and drugs for epidural labor analgesia. Seminars in Perinatology, 26(2), 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. (2002). Sir James Young Simpson (1811–1870) and obstetric anaesthesia. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 86, F207–F209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (1973). Witches, midwives and nurses: A history of women healers. New York: The Feminist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (1979). For her own good: 150 years of the experts’ advice to women. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, K., Foureur, M., & Hastie, C. (Eds.). (2008). Birth territory and midwifery guardianship: Theory for practice, education and research. Sydney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finster, M., & Santos, A. (1998). The effects of epidural analgesia on the course and outcome of labour. Baillière’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 12(3), 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 by Michel Foucault (pp. 78–108). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003 [1963]). The birth of the clinic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007 [1961]). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. London: Routledge Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008 [1976]). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). Melbourne: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foureur, M. (2008). Creating birth space to enable undisturbed birth. In K. Fahy, M. Foureur, & C. Hastie (Eds.), Birth territory and midwifery guardianship: Theory for practice, education and research (pp. 57–77). Sydney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaiser, R. (2005). Labor epidurals and outcome. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Anaesthesiology, 19(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, J., & Vernon, B. (2007). Midwifery in Australia: Emerging from the shadows. In L. Reid (Ed.), Midwifery: Freedom to practise? An international exploration of midwifery practice. Sydney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gélis, J. (1991). History of childbirth: Fertility, pregnancy and birth in early modern Europe. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (Ed.). (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 by Michel Foucault. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J. (1986). Feminist philosophers. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, M. E., Hannah, W. J., Hewson, S. A., Hodnett, E. D., Saigal, S., Willan, A. R., & Collaborative, T. B. T. (2000). Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial. The Lancet, 356(9239), 1375–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, R. (2005). Instrumental vaginal delivery. Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 15, 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, S., & Sleigh, M. (2003). Epidural or no epidural anaesthesia: Relationships between beliefs about childbirth and pain control choices. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 21(4), 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemminki, E., & Gissler, M. (1996). Epidural analgesia as a risk factor for operative delivery. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 53, 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilder, L., Zhichao, Z., Parker, M., Jahan, S., & Chambers, G. (2014). Australia’s mothers and babies 2012. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. (1988). The tragedy of technology. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodnett, E. (2002). Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(5 Suppl 1), S160–S172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högberg, U. (2004). The decline in maternal mortality in Sweden: The role of community midwifery. The American Journal of Public Health, 94(8), 1312–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, C., & Chalmers, I. (1992). A review of prospectively controlled comparisons of epidural with non-epidural forms of pain relief during labour. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1(2), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights in Childbirth. (2015). http://www.humanrightsinchildbirth.org/. Viewed Dec 2017.

  • Humphrey, M., Bonello, M., Chughtai, A., Macaldowie, A., Harris, K., & Chambers, G. (2015). Maternal deaths in Australia 2008–2012. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1977). Limits to medicine. Medical nemesis: The expropriation of health. Ringwood: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Arya, V., Gopalan, S., & Jain, V. (2003). Analgesic efficacy of intramuscular opioids versus epidural analgesia in labor. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 83, 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (1997). Randomized controlled trials as authoritative knowledge: Keeping an ally from becoming a threat to North American midwifery practice. In R. Davis-Floyd & C. Sargent (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross-cultural perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Bonello, M., Li, Z., Hilder, L., & Sullivan, E. (2014). Maternal deaths in Australia 2006–2010. Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S., Emery, S., Watkins, A., Evans, J., Storey, M., & Morgan, G. (2009). Associations of drugs routinely given in labour with breastfeeding at 48 hours: Analysis of the Cardiff Births Survey. BJOG, 116, 1622–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, S., Jamison, R. N., & Datta, S. (2001). Maternal satisfaction and pain control in women electing natural childbirth. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 26(5), 468–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keirse, M. (2002). Evidence-based childbirth only for breech babies? Birth, 29(1), 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall-Tackett, K., Cong, Z., & Hale, T. W. (2015). Birth interventions related to lower rates of exclusive breastfeeding and increased risk of postpartum depression in a large sample. Clinical Lactation, 6(3), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, S. (2005). The politics of birth. Sydney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (2011). Epidural analgesia for pain management: The positive and the negative. In S. Donna (Ed.), Promoting normal birth: Research, reflections & guidelines. Chester-le-Street: Fresh Heart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotaska, A. (2004). Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: Case study of vaginal breech delivery. British Medical Journal, 329, 1039–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotaska, A., Klein, M., & Liston, R. (2006). Epidural analgesia associated with low-dose oxytocin augmentation increases cesarean births: A critical look at the external validity of randomized trials. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194, 809–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A. (1964). Introduction. In E. Anscombe & P. Geach (Eds.), Descartes: Philosophical writings. London: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lain, S., Ford, J., Hadfield, R., Blyth, F., Giles, W., & Roberts, C. (2008). Trends in the use of epidural analgesia in Australia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 102, 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, T. (1990). Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leap, N., & Anderson, T. (2008). The role of pain in normal birth and the empowerment of women. In S. Downe (Ed.), Normal childbirth: Evidence and debate (pp. 29–46). Sydney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, E., & O’Donoghue, C. (2002). Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 186(5 Suppl Nature), S31–S68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, A. (1937). Introduction. In E. Rhys (Ed.), A discourse on method, etc. [1637]. London: J.M Dent & Sons Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, I., & Dahlberg, I. (1998). Women’s experience of pain during childbirth. Midwifery, 14, 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, J. (2002). Visibly pregnant: Toward a placental body. Feminist Review, 72, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander, R. (1998a). Pain in childbearing and its control. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, R. (1998b). Analgesia and anaesthesia in childbirth: Obscurantism and obfuscation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(1), 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1972). One dimensional man. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. (1996). Our bodies ourselves: Why we should add old fashioned empirical phenomenology to the new theories of the body. Women’s Studies International Forum, 19(3), 253–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1989). The woman in the body. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. (1989). The women’s history of the world. Topsfield: Salem House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsy, S. (1996). Political economy in medical anthropology. In C. F. Sargent & T. M. Johnson (Eds.), Medical anthropology: Contemporary theory and method (Rev. ed., pp. 21–40). London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy-Lawless, J. (1998). Reading birth and death: A history of obstetric thinking. Cork: Cork University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Rural Health Alliance. (2012). Rural maternity services: Investing in the future. Deakin West: National Rural Health Alliance. http://ruralhealth.org.au/. Viewed Dec 2017.

  • Newnham, E. C. (2010). Midwifery directions: The Australian maternity services review. Health Sociology Review, 19(2), 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newnham, E. C. (2014). Birth control: Power/knowledge in the politics of birth. Health Sociology Review, 23(3), 254–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newnham, E., McKellar, L., & Pincombe, J. (2016). A critical literature review of epidural analgesia. Evidence Based Midwifery, 14(1), 22–28. Copyright permission obtained from the Royal College of Midwives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, B. (2002). Natural childbirth is inappropriate in a modern world. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 11(1), 28–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystedt, A., Edvardsson, D., & Willman, A. (2004). Epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour and childbirth – A review with a systematic approach. Women and Children, 13, 455–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1984). The captured womb: A history of the medical care of pregnant women. New York: Basil Blackwell Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odent, M. (1999). The scientification of love. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rådestad, I., Olsson, A., Nissen, E., & Rubertsson, C. (2008). Tears in the vagina, perineum, sphincter ani, and rectum and first sexual intercourse after childbirth: A nationwide follow-up. Birth, 35(2), 98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, V., Hallgren, A., Hogberg, H., Hurtig, I., & Odlind, V. (2002). Plasma oxytocin levels in women during labor with or without epidural analgesia: A prospective study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 81, 1033–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramin, S., Gambling, D., Lucas, M., Sharma, S., Sidawi, J., & Leveno, K. (1995). Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 86(5), 783–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiger, K., & Dempsey, R. (2006). Performing birth in a culture of fear: An embodied crisis of late modernity. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1986). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution [1976]. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, A., & Lothian, J. (2008). Promoting, protecting, and supporting normal birth: A look at the evidence. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 35(2), 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roome, S., Hartz, D., Tracy, S., & Welsh, A. W. (2015). Why such differing stances? A review of position statements on home birth from professional colleges. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 123(3), 376–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ros, A., Felberbaum, R., Jahnke, I., Diedrich, K., Schmucker, P., & Huppe, M. (2007). Epidural anaesthesia for labour: Does it influence the mode of delivery? Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 275, 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, B. K. (1982). In labor: Women and power in the birthplace. London: W.W Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, B. K. (1989). Recreating motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal society. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scamell, M., & Stewart, M. (2014). Time, risk and midwife practice: The vaginal examination. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., McIntire, D., Wiley, J., & Leveno, K. (2004). Labor analgesia and cesarean delivery: An individual patient meta-analysis of nulliparous women. Anesthesiology, 100, 142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., & Baer, H. (1995). Critical medical anthropology. New York: Bayswood Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, M., & Kingdon, C. (2008). Vaginal or caesarean delivery? How research has turned breech birth around. Evidence Based Midwifery, 6(3), 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratmann, L. (2003). Chloroform: The quest for oblivion. Stroud: Sutton Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, A. (1995). ‘For I have ever so much faith in her as a nurse’: The eclipse of the community midwife in South Australia. PhD thesis, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, J. A., Parisi, V. M., Boylan, P. C., & Johnston, D. A. (1989). The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 161(3), 670–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, P., McCarthy, R., Ebarvia, M., & Wong, C. (2009). A retrospective case-controlled study of the association between request to discontinue second stage labor epidural analgesia and risk of instrumental delivery. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 17, 304–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towler, J., & Bramall, J. (1986). Midwives in history and society. London: Croon Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S., Sullivan, E., Wang, Y., Black, D., & Tracy, M. (2007). Birth outcomes associated with interventions in labour amongst low risk women: A population-based study. Women and Birth, 20(2), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2003). The oxytocin factor. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2016). Keynote address ‘the oxytocin factor’. In Normal Labour and Birth Conference, University of Central Lancashire/Australian College of Midwives, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Gucht, N., & Lewis, K. (2015). Women’s experiences of coping with pain during childbirth: A critical review of qualitative research. Midwifery, 31(3), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2001). Fish can’t see water: The need to humanize birth. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 75(Suppl 1), S25–S37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waitzkin, H. (1983). The second sickness: Contradictions of capitalist health care. London: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenström, U., Hildingsson, I., Rubertsson, C., & Rådestad, I. (2004). A negative birth experience: Prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth, 31(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D. (2009). Pain and epidural use in normal childbirth. Evidence Based Midwifery, 7(3), 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D. (2012). Evidence and skills for normal birth. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D., El-Nemer, A., & Downe, S. (2008). Rethinking risk and safety in maternity care. In S. Downe (Ed.), Normal childbirth: Evidence and debate (2nd ed.). Sydney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Shen, X., Guo, X., Peng, Y., & Gu, X. (2009). Epidural analgesia in the latent phase of labor and the risk of cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology, 111, 871–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendland, C. (2007). The vanishing mother: Cesarean section and “evidence-based obstetrics”. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 21(2), 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, R. W., & Wertz, D. C. (1989). Lying in: A history of childbirth in America (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1996). Care in normal birth. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2015). WHO statement on Caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/161442/1/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf?ua=1. Viewed Dec 2017.

  • Wiklund, I., Norman, M., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Ransjo-Arvidson, A. B., & Andolf, E. (2009). Epidural analgesia: Breast-feeding success and related factors. Midwifery, 25(2), e31–e38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, E. (1989). Medical dominance (2nd ed.). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Newnham, E., McKellar, L., Pincombe, J. (2018). The Epidural in Context. In: Towards the Humanisation of Birth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69962-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69962-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69961-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69962-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics