Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought ((PMHIT))

  • 370 Accesses

Abstract

In this concluding chapter, I outline the pluralist seizure of a nineteenth-century relict, the democratic peace promise. I summarise how pluralism, following the extension of suffrage, shifted its attention to the relationship between groups and the state and between transnational civil society and the League of Nations and the United Nations. I show how pluralism behaves in relation to liberal internationalism and classical realism and recall, on the basis of pluralism, how theories about domestic democracy and theories of international organisations co-evolved before scientific liberal democratic peace theory introduced new inside/outside distinctions. Finally, I warn that pluralism’s anti-nationalist attempts should not be equated with the glorification of all civil society organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ashworth, L. (2007). International relations and the Labour Party. Intellectuals and policy making from 1918–1945. London: Tauris Academic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, J. (2001). The critique of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2014). What is liberalism? Political Theory, 42(6), 682–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (2010). The primacy of politics. Social democracy and the making of Europe’s twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bexell, M., Tallberg, J., & Uhlin, A. (2010). Democracy in global governance: The promises and pitfalls of transnational actors. Global Governance, 16(1), 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, L., Geis, A., & Müller, H. (2006). Introduction: The theoretical challenge of democratic war. In A. Geis, L. Brock, & H. Müller (Eds.), Democratic wars. Looking at the dark side of the democratic peace (pp. 3–12). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2015). The global transformation. History, modernity and the making of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (2009). Democracy in international society: Promotion or exclusion? Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37(3), 563–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, M. (2005). Global institutions, marginalization, and development. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. (2013). NGOs. A new history of transnational civil society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, E. (1991). Deutschland und die westlichen Demokratien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilhot, N. (2005). Democracy makers. Human rights and the politics of global order. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, C. (2015). The rise of democracy. Revolution, war, and transformations in international politics since 1776. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R., Macedo, S., & Moravcsik, A. (2009). Democracy-enhancing multilateralism. International Organization, 63(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, N. (2016). National indentities and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, J. (1998). On liberal peace. Democracy, war and the international order. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masquelier, C., & Dawson, M. (2016). Beyond capitalism and liberal democracy: On the relevance of GDH Cole’s sociological critique and alternative. Current Sociology, 64(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazower, M. (1998). Dark continent. Europe’s twentieth century. New York: Vintage Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, F. (1960). Die Idee der Staatsräson in der neueren Geschichte. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously. A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morefield, J. (2017). Urgent history. The sovereignty debates and political theory’s lost voices. Political Theory, 45(2), 164–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J.-W. (2016). Was ist Populismus? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1945). The children of light and the children of darkness. A vindication of democracy and a critique of its traditional defenders. London: Nisbet & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (2008). The irony of American history. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ottoway, M. (2001). Corporatism goes global: International organizations, nongovernmental organization networks, and transnational business. Global Governance, 7(3), 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenboim, O. (2017). The emergence of globalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, D. (2013). The confidence trap. A history of democracy in crisis from World War I to the present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace. Principles for a post-war world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. (1998). The political discourse of anarchy. A disciplinary history of international relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvest, C. (2007). Beyond the state? Pluralism and internationalism in early twentieth-century Britain. International Relations, 21(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvest, C. (2009). British liberal internationalism, 1880–1930. Making progress? Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K. (1979). Ethics, functionalism, and power in international politics. The crisis in values. London: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjalve, T. (2008). Realist strategies of republican peace. Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and the politics of patriotic dissent. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tooze, A. (2014). The deluge. The great war, America, and the remaking of the global order 1916–1931. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1968). Man, the state, and war. A theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holthaus, L. (2018). Conclusion. In: Pluralist Democracy in International Relations. The Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70422-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics