Skip to main content

Theoretical Approaches to US Foreign Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Islam, Securitization, and US Foreign Policy
  • 920 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the main theories that have guided US foreign policy. First, it introduces the main doctrines, actors, and current debates regarding US foreign policy. Second, it introduces the realist political thought and analyzes how much realism has guided US foreign policy. Afterward, it introduces the liberalist political thought and an analysis of the main debates within liberalism. A special place is given to the Democratic Peace theory, a liberalist theory that has guided US foreign policy since Woodrow Wilson. Realism and liberalism are the main theories in international relations and political science, and it is important for this work to touch upon them in discussing the US foreign policy. But, these theories are only analyzed in the context of how much they have influenced the US policymaking and not in much detail about theoretical concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The “red” metaphor has been widely used to describe the substitution of the Soviet threat with that of Islamic threat. Authors such as Lewis (1990) and Pipes (1994), who held important positions in W. Bush’s administrations, have often compared these two, and authors such as Esposito (1999), Hadar (1995), and Halliday (1995), among many others, have used the comparison of “red” versus “green” in their writings. We have elaborated more on this when we speak on the “US Foreign Policy and Islam”.

  2. 2.

    The story behind how this turned out to be called the CNN effect is best explained by Babak Bahador (2007: 3): “At 2:38 am, on January 17, 1991, the residents of Baghdad were woken by the launch of the first Gulf War. […] Later that same night, a senior officer at Pentagon Command Center checked his watch while speaking to those planning the air attack and stated, while watching one broadcast, ‘If the cruise missile is on target … the reporter will go off the air about … Now!’ He was right. At that moment, the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) and the National Broadcasting Company (NBC) reports from Baghdad stopped broadcasting. These networks were relying on Iraqi communications network, which had just been destroyed. Cable News Network (CNN), which was transmitted over a dedicated circuit set up before war, however, remained on air. For the next two weeks, CNN was the only American television network broadcasting from Iraq . As a result, this relatively new and renegade organization that promised to be different by delivering 24-hour news surged in recognition and prestige. Its subscription base, in fact, grew substantially over the period of the Gulf War. Its name also became synonymous with rapid image and information transmission from the scene of action and, more importantly, the implication of this phenomenon on politics and foreign policy.”

  3. 3.

    Speeches made by many congressman and senators of that time can be reached at Graebner (1968).

References

  • Angell, Norman. 1910. The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relations of Military Power to National Advantage. New York/London: G. Putnam and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahador, Babak. 2007. The CNN Effect in Action: How the News Media Pushed the West Toward the War in Kosovo. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Kevin. 2001. The Year in Ideas: A to Z.: American Imperialism, Embraced. New York Times, December 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamford, J. 2001. Body of Secrets. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. A Pretext for War: 9/11, Iraq and the Abuse of America’s Intelligence Agencies. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin. 1996. Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinart, Peter. 2008. The Good Fight: Why Liberals – and Only Liberals – Can Win the War on Terror and Make America Great Again. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Samuel R. 2000. A Foreign Policy for the Global Age. Foreign Policy, November/December. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/56625/samuel-r-berger/a-foreign-policy-for-the-global-age. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.

  • Beugel, Ernst H. Van Der. 1966. From Marshall Plan to Atlantic Partnership. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinken, A. 2001. The False Crisis Over the Atlantic. Foreign Affairs, May/June.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkley, Douglas. 1997. Democratic Enlargement: The Clinton Doctrine. Foreign Policy 106: 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Patrick J. 1999. A Republic, Not an Empire: Reclaiming America’s Destiny. Lanham: Regnery Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry, and Ana Gonzalez-Pelaez. 2009. International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry, and Lene Hansen. 2009. The Evolution of International Security Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry, and Ole Waever. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Fraser. 2002. US Foreign Policy After the Cold War: Global Hegemon or Reluctant Sheriff? London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. 1946. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939. New York: Harper & Row.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Jimmy. 1980. The State of the Union Address Delivered Before a Joint Session of the Congress, January 23. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=33079. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Clark, Wesley K. 2001. Waging Modern War: Bosnia, Kosovo, and the Future of Combat. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, William J. 1999. Remarks by the President on Foreign Policy, February 26. https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/clintfps.htm. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Cohen, Bernard C. 1973. The Public’s Impact on Foreign Policy. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, John Milton. 2008. Making a Case for Wilson. In Reconsidering Woodrow Wilson: Progressivism, Internationalism, War, and Peace, ed. John Milton Cooper Jr., 9–24. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Michael, et al. 2000. Introduction. In American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts, ed. Michael Cox, G. John Ikenberry, and Takashi Inoguchi, 1–17. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Michael, Timothy J. Lynch, and Nicolas Bouchet, eds. 2013. US Foreign Policy and Democracy Promotion: From Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabb, Cecil V., Jr. 1982. Doctrines of American Foreign Policy: Their Meaning, Role and Future. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, Alexander. 1946. Democracy in America. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destler, I.M., L.H. Gelb, and Anthony Lake. 1984. Our Own Worst Enemy: The Unmaking of American Foreign Policy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, E. J. Jr. 2009. The Obama Doctrine in Action. Washington Post, April 16. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/15/AR2009041502902.html. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Divine, Robert A. 1969. Roosevelt and World War II. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Michael. 1983. Kant. Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Policy. Parts 1 and 2. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12: 205–235 and 323–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Kant’s Perpetual Peace. American Political Science Review 80: 1115–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Ways of War and Peace. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Peace, Liberty and Democracy: Realist and Liberals Contest a Legacy. In American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts, ed. Michael Cox, G. John Ikenberry, and Takashi Inoguchi, 21–40. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dueck, Colin. 2003. Hegemony on the Cheap: Liberal Internationalism from Wilson to Bush. World Policy Journal 20 (4): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, Alfred E. 1971. A Search for Solvency: Bretton Woods and the International Monetary System, 1944–1971. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhower, Dwight D. 1957. Eisenhower Doctrine, January 5. http://millercenter.org/president/eisenhower/speeches/speech-3360. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Esposito, John. 1999. The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3): 379–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Thomas L. 2001. The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, David. 1995. In the Time of the Americans: The Generation that Changed America’s Role in the World. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 2006. America at Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholz, Eugene, Daryl G. Press, and Harvey Sapolsky. 1997. Come Home America: The Strategy of Restraints in the Face of Temptation. International Security 21: 79–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Felix. 1961. To the Farewell Address: Ideas of Early American Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert. 1975. U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Charles L. 1997. The Security Dilemma Revisited. World Politics 50 (1): 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P.H., and J. Shapiro. 2004. Allies at War: America, Europe, and the Crisis Over Iraq. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowa, Joanne. 1995. Democratic States and International Disputes. International Organization 49 (3): 511–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graebner, Norman. 1968. Manifest Destiny. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, Leon T. 1995. Political Islam Is Not a Threat to the West. In Paul A. Winters. Ed. Islam: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, D. 2001. War in a Time of Peace. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, Fred. 1995. Islam and the Myth of Confrontation. London: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastedt, Glenn P. 2015. American Foreign Policy: Past, Present, and Future. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, Craig. 1999. Pity, not US Security, Motivated Use of GIs in Somalia, Bush Says. The Houston Chronicle, October 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1985. Leviathan. Baltimore: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Michael H. 2009. Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. 1992. The Third Wave Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Why International Primacy Matters. International Security 17 (4): 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1999. The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs, March/April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, James Robert. 1980. Using the Democracies: Institutions of the Emerging Atlantic-Pacific System. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Pax Democratica: A Strategy for the Twenty-First Century. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, John G. 2000. America’s Liberal Grand Strategy: Democracy and National Security in the Post-War Era. In American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts, ed. Michael Cox, G. John Ikenberry, and Takashi Inoguchi, 103–126. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and Rebuilding of Order After Major War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Woodrow Wilson, the Bush Administration, and the Future of Liberal Internationalism. In The Crisis of American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-First Century, ed. John G. Ikenberry et al., 1–24. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, John G., and Charles Kupchan. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 43 (3): 283–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Douglas A. 1996. Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Andrew. 1837. Jackson’s Farewell Address. http://www.nationalcenter.org/Jackson'sFarewell.html. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30 (2): 167–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Lyndon B. 1963. The President’s New Conference, December 18. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=26465. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • ———. 1966. Remarks Upon Receiving an Honorary Degree at the University of Denver, August 26. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=27809. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.

  • Johnson, Chalmers. 2000. Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, Miles. 1997. Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory After 1945. In New Thinking in International Relations Theory, ed. Michael Doyle and G. John Ikenberry. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1983. Perpetual Peace and Other Essays. Trans. Ted Humphrey. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennan, George. 1983. Memoirs 1925–1963. Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. American Diplomacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennan, George F. 1993. Somalia, Through a Glass Darkly. New York Times, September 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. The Cloud of Danger: Some Current Problems of American Foreign Policy. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, John F. 1961. Inaugural Address, January 20. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/kennedy.asp. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.

  • Keynes, John Maynard. 1920. The Economic Consequences of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Howe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, Henry. 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a Diplomacy for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knock, Thomas J. 1992. To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Playing for a Hundred Years Hence: Woodrow Wilson’s Internationalism and His Would-Be Heirs. In The Crisis of American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-First Century, ed. John G. Ikenberry et al., 25–52. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World Again Global Liberalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Steven, and I.M. Destler. 1999. Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, Charles A. 2001. The End of the American Era. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFeber, Walter, ed. 1965. John Quincy Adams and American Continental Empire. Chicago: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, David. 1991. British and American Hegemony Compared: Lessons for the Current Era of Decline. In History, the White House, and the Kremlin: Statesmen as Historians, ed. Michael Fry, 106–122. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, Anthony. 1995. Remarks on the Occasion of the 10th Anniversary of the Center for Democracy. Washington, DC, September 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landesman, Charles. 1989. Reflections on Hobbes: Anarchy and Human Nature. In The Causes of Quarrel: Essays on Peace, War, and Thomas Hobbes, ed. Peter Caws, 139–148. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laswell, Harold Dwight. 1950. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, Christopher, and M. Lynn-Jones. 1998. Should America Promote Democracy? Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack S. 1988. Domestic Politics and War: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 (4): 653–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Bernard. 1990. The Roots of Muslim Rage. Atlantic Monthly, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Arthur S. 1954. Woodrow Wilson and the Progressive Era, 1910–1917. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 1966. The Papers of Woodrow Wilson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. Wilson the Diplomatist. New York: New Viewpoints.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, Martin. 1986. Impact: How the Federal Press Affects Policy-Making. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, Walter. 1995. Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Saymour Martin. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53: 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1988. Two Treaties on Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Longregan, John B., and Keith Poole. 1996. Does High Income Promote Democracy? World Politics 49: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, Roger. 1978. Imperialism at Bay: The United States and the Decolonization of British Empire, 1941–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luard, Evan. 1976. Types of International Society. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukacs, John. 1997. The Hitler of History. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Timothy. 2013. George W. Bush. In US Foreign Policy and Democracy Promotion: From Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama, ed. Michael Cox, Timothy J. Lynch, and Nicolas Bouchet, 178–195. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbaum, Michael. 1996. Foreign Policy as Social Work. Foreign Affairs, January/February. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/51618/michael-mandelbaum/foreign-policy-as-social-work. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.

  • Markwell, Donald. 2006. John Maynard Keynes and International Relations: Economic Paths to War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Matt. 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 563–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, Walter. 1997. Promised Land, Crusader State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, David. 1986. American Nationalism, the China Myth, and the Truman Doctrine: the Question of Accommodation with Peking, 1949–50. Diplomatic History 10: 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Robert J. 1981. Colonialism and Cold War: The United States and the Struggle for Indonesian Independence, 1945–49. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWallace, W. 2001. Europe, the Necessary Partner. Foreign Affairs, May/June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John J. 1995. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War. In The Peril of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security, ed. Michael E. Brown, Sean M. Lynn-Jones, and Steven E. Miller, 5–56. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John J., and Stephen M. Walt. 2007. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, James. 1823. Monroe’s Seventh Annual Massage to Congress, December 2. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/monroe.asp. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Moore, John Allphin, and Jerry Pubantz Jr. 2006. The New United Nations: International Organization in the Twenty-First Century. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4): 513–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, Hans. 1946. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1969. A New Foreign Policy for the United States. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Craig. 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nau, Henry. 2000. America’s Identity, Democracy Promotion and National Interest: Beyond Realism, Beyond Idealism. In American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts, ed. Michael Cox, G. John Ikenberry, and Takashi Inoguchi, 127–148. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neustadt, R. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Maxwell Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. 2007. Democratic Debate on NPR, December 4. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/us/politics/04transcript-debate.html?pagewanted=7%27s%20Changed&sq=Nothing&st=cse&scp=7&_r=0. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Newhouse, J. 2001. The Missile Defense Debate. Foreign Affairs, July/August.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, Edgar B., ed. 1969a. Franklin D. Roosevelt and Foreign Affairs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, Richard. 1969b. Address to the Nation on the War in Vietnam, November 3. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/primary-resources/nixon-vietnam/, Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Nye, Joseph. 2002. The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, John, and Bruce Russett. 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985. International Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, J.L. 1839. The Great Nation of Futurity. The United States Democratic Review 6 (23): 426–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, Thomas. 1995. The Rights of Man. In Complete Writings, ed. E. Foner. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. 2001. Preparing for the Next Attack. Foreign Affairs, November/December.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipes, Daniel. 1994. Same Difference: The Islamic Threat Part I. National Review, November 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Adam. 2013. Theodore Roosevelt. In US Foreign Policy and Democracy Promotion: From Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama, ed. Michael Cox, Timothy J. Lynch, and Nicolas Bouchet, 37–52. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, Ronald. 1985. Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union, February 6. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=38069, Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Rice, Condoleezza, and Philip D. Zelikow. 1997. Germany Unified and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M. 1977. The Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Piers. 2002. The CNN Effect: The Myth of News, Foreign Policy and Intervention. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, David. 2012. The Obama Doctrine. Foreign Policy, February 27. http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/02/27/the-obama-doctrine/. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Rose, Gideon. 1998. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics 51 (1): 144–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenman, Samuel I. 1950. The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Evelyne Huber Stephens, and John D. Stephens. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36: 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russett, Bruce, and John Oneal. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, Bruce, John Oneal, and David R. Davis. 1998. The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organization and Militarized Disputes, 1950–1985. International Organizations 52 (3): 441–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph. 1950. Imperialism and Social Classes. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, Randall L. 1994. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Security 19 (1): 72–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, Randall. 2000. US Democracy Promotion: Realist Reflections. In American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts, ed. Michael Cox, G. John Ikenberry, and Takashi Inoguchi, 41–62. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, Martin. 1971. Games of Status. Behavioral Sciences 16 (3): 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siracusa, Joseph. 1973. New Left Diplomatic Historians and Histories: The American Revisionists. New York: Regina Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2009. Wilsonianism in the Twenty-First Century. In The Crisis of American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-First Century, ed. John G. Ikenberry et al., 89–117. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tony. 2000. National Security Liberalism and American Foreign Policy. In American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts, ed. Michael Cox, G. John Ikenberry, and Takashi Inoguchi, 85–102. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. A Pact with the Devil: Washington’s Bid for World Supremacy & the Betrayal of the American Promise. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Wilsonianism After Iraq: The End of Liberal Internationalism? In The Crisis of American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-First Century, ed. John G. Ikenberry et al., 53–88. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, Georg. 2000. The Impasse of Third World Democratization: Africa Revisited. In American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts, ed. Michael Cox, G. John Ikenberry, and Takashi Inoguchi, 287–307. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spellberg, Denise A. 2013. Thomas Jefferson’s Qur’an: Islam and the Founders. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, David. 1994. The Insignificance of Liberal Peace. International Security 19 (2): 50–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steigerwald, David. 1994. Wilsonian Idealism in America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, Strobe. 1996. Democracy and the National Interest. Foreign Affairs 74 (6): 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, John A. 2013. Woodrow Wilson. In US Foreign Policy and Democracy Promotion: From Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama, ed. Michael Cox, Timothy J. Lynch, and Nicolas Bouchet, 53–68. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, Christopher. 1979. Allies of a Kind: The United States, Britain, and the War Against Japan, 1941–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thucydides. 1970. History of the Peloponnesian War. Trans. Rex Warner. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, Harry S. 1947. President Harry S. Truman’s Address Before a Joint Session of Congress, March 12. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/trudoc.asp. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Vasquez, John A. 1997. The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative Versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz’s Balancing Proposition. American Political Science 91 (4): 899–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volgy, Thomas J., and John E. Schwarz. 1997. Free Trade, Economic Inequality and the Stability of Democracies in the Democratic Core of Peace. European Journal of International Relations 3 (2): 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of the Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. Conflict in World Politics. In Conflict in World Politics, ed. Steven L. Spiegel and Kenneth N. Waltz. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, William Appleman. 2001. History as a Way of Learning: Articles, Excerpts, and Essays. New York: Franklin Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The Tragedy of American Diplomacy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company: 50th Anniversary Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Woodrow. 1913. Annual Message to Congress on the State of the Union. 2 December. In The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, ed. Arthur S. Link, vol. 29. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1914. Address at the Independence Hall: “The Meaning of Liberty”. July, 4. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=65381. Accessed 15 Aug 2015.

  • Wittkopf, Eugene R., and James McCormick. 1999. The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy. Lanham: Rowan and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, R. 2004. Plan of Attack. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shipoli, E.A. (2018). Theoretical Approaches to US Foreign Policy. In: Islam, Securitization, and US Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71111-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics