Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MOOC-ing the Discipline: Tensions in the Development and Enactment of a Massive Open Online Course

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reconfiguring Knowledge in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 50))

  • 843 Accesses

Abstract

In the current university context, academics are required to respond to multiple and competing demands which orient both away from their disciplinary field, and inwardly towards its own norms and development. In this chapter I examine the tensions between these inward and outward facing agendas, drawing on a case study of the re-articulation of an undergraduate biological sciences subject into the form of a massive open online course (MOOC). The case study forms part of a broader PhD project which is investigating a select number of online courses (both MOOCs and for-fee online courses) being developed across two universities, with a focus on the thinking and assumptions informing the process of curriculum development. The discussion points to some of the tensions and challenges in simultaneously adhering to disciplinary conventions and engaging in outward-facing conversations where the taken-for-granted disciplinary rules may not apply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., & Coates, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham/Philadelphia: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research and critique. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? Office of the Provost. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, A. (1997). The science-society contract in historical transformation: With special reference to “epistemic drift”. Social Science Information, 36(3), 411–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensor, P. (2004). Contesting discourses in higher education curriculum restructuring in South Africa. Higher Education, 48(3), 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, F., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. T. C. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education. Columbia: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karseth, B. (2006). Curriculum restructuring in higher education after the Bologna process: A new pedagogic regime? Revista española de educaciĂłn comparada, 12, 255–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “massive” education in the E-learning and digital cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. (2009). Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Journal of Education & Work, 22(3), 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J., & Young, M. (2014). Disciplines, skills and the university. Higher Education, 67(2), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R. (2005). Universities in the marketplace: The distortion of teaching and research. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 27–36). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, K. (2014). MOOCs, institutional policy and change dynamics in higher education. Higher Education, 68(5), 623–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?pagewanted=all

  • Yates, L., Woelert, P., Millar, V., & O’Connor, K. (2017). Knowledge at the crossroads: Physics and history in the changing world of schools and universities. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Kate O’Connor

Authors
  1. Kate O’Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate O’Connor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Peter Maassen

  2. Department of Education Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Monika Nerland

  3. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Lyn Yates

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Connor, K. (2018). MOOC-ing the Discipline: Tensions in the Development and Enactment of a Massive Open Online Course. In: Maassen, P., Nerland, M., Yates, L. (eds) Reconfiguring Knowledge in Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 50. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72832-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72832-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72831-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72832-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation