Skip to main content

Towards a Conceptual Framework to Scaffold Self-regulation in a MOOC

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovation and Interdisciplinary Solutions for Underserved Areas (CNRIA 2017, InterSol 2017)

Abstract

MOOCs are part of the ecosystem of self-learning for which self-regulation is one of the pillars. Weakness of self-regulation skills is one of the key factors that contribute to dropout in a MOOC. We present a conceptual framework to promote self-regulated learning in a MOOC. This framework relies on the use of a virtual companion to provide metacognitive prompts and a visualization of indicators. The aim of this system will not only be to improve the quality of learning on the MOOC but also to help reducing attrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ITYPA: “Internet Tout y est pour Apprendre” is the first French cMOOC.

  2. 2.

    GDP (Introduction to Project Management) is the first French xMOOC and one of the most prominent French MOOC with over 130,000 persons registered in 8 sessions over 4 years.

References

  1. Azevedo, R., Aleven, V.: International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Azevedo, R., Martin, S.A., Taub, M., Mudrick, N.V., Millar, G.C., Grafsgaard, J.F.: Are pedagogical agents’ external regulation effective in fostering learning with intelligent tutoring systems? In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. volume 9684, pp. 197–207. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bannert, M., Mengelkamp, C.: Scaffolding hypermedia learning through metacognitive prompts. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 171–186. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouchet, F., Harley, J.M., Azevedo, R.: Can adaptive pedagogical agents’ prompting strategies improve students’ learning and self-regulation? In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. volume 9684, pp. 368–374. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bull, S., Kay, J.: Open learner models as drivers for metacognitive processes. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 349–365. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cisel, M.: Analyzing completion rates of first French xMOOC. In: Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014, p. 26 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Azevedo, R., Bouchet, F., Tian, Y.: The role of an open learner model and immediate feedback on metacognitive calibration in MetaTutor. In: The 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ge, X.: Designing learning technologies to support self-regulation during ill-structured problem-solving processes. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 213–228. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Gütl, C., Rizzardini, R.H., Chang, V., Morales, M.: Attrition in MOOC: lessons learned from drop-out students. In: Uden, L., Sinclair, J., Tao, Y.-H., Liberona, D. (eds.) LTEC 2014. CCIS, vol. 446, pp. 37–48. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10671-7_4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khalil, H., Ebner, M.: MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention-a literature review. Inb: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2014, pp. 1305–1313 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., Schneider, E.: Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 170–179. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kizilcec, R.F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Maldonado, J.J.: Recommending self-regulated learning strategies does not improve performance in a MOOC. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, Edinburgh, UK (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meyer, R.: What it’s like to teach a MOOC (and what the heck’s a MOOC?). The Atlantic (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nawrot I., Doucet, A.: Building engagement for MOOC students: introducing support for time management on online learning platforms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2014 Companion, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1077–1082. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ramesh, A., Goldwasser, D., Huang, B., Daume III, H., Getoor, L.: Modeling learner engagement in MOOCs using probabilistic soft logic. In: NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reich, J.: MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent. EDUCAUSE Review Online (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosé, C.P., Carlson, R., Yang, D., Wen, M., Resnick, L., Goldman, P., Sherer, J.: Social factors that contribute to attrition in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, pp. 197–198. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sambe, G.: Vers un apprentissage autorégulé dans les MOOC. In: Rencontres Jeunes Chercheurs Environnements Informatiques pour l’Apprentissage Humain, pp. 101–106 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J.: Motivation and Self-regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. Routledge, Upper Saddle River (2012). Google-Books-ID: MDQLfOg0jX0C

    Google Scholar 

  20. Terry, K.P.S.: The effects of online time management practices on self-regulated learning and academic self-efficacy. Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, D., Wen, M., Rose, C.: Peer influence on attrition in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of Educational Data Mining (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmerman, B.J., Bonner, S., Pagnoulle, C., Kovach, R., Smets, G.: Des apprenants autonomes: Autorégulation des apprentissages. De Boeck Supérieur, April 2000

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zimmerman, B.J., Campillo, M.: Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In: Davidson, J.E., Sternberg, R.E. (eds.) The Psychology of Problem Solving, pp. 233–262. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partially supported by University Assane Seck of Ziguinchor (UASZ), Sénégal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gorgoumack Sambe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sambe, G., Bouchet, F., Labat, JM. (2018). Towards a Conceptual Framework to Scaffold Self-regulation in a MOOC. In: M. F. Kebe, C., Gueye, A., Ndiaye, A. (eds) Innovation and Interdisciplinary Solutions for Underserved Areas. CNRIA InterSol 2017 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 204. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72965-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72965-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72964-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72965-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics