Skip to main content

Eliciting the Ancient Geography from a Digital Library of Latin Texts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Libraries and Multimedia Archives (IRCDL 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 806))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 686 Accesses

Abstract

GeolatGeography for Latin Literature is a research project, aimed at making accessible a digital library containing the works of Latin literature (from its origins in 240 BCE to the end of the Roman Empire in 476 CE) through a query interface of geographic/cartographic type representing the geographic knowledge expressed in the Latin texts themselves. A core activity of the project has been the development of the ontology GO!, which describes the geographical knowledge contained in the texts of the library. The ontologically annotated texts will allow for a variety of scientifically relevant uses, apart from the geo-based browsing: for example the production of digital and printed critical editions. The project is under development at Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici of Università del Piemonte Orientale, and financially supported by Fondazione Compagnia di San Paolo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    M. Lana is specifically responsible for Sects. 1 and 5, and T. Tambassi for Sects. 24.

  2. 2.

    Until now the Latin texts are offered with no translation because even if translations do exist for them, recent translations are protected by Intellectual Property Rights; and if they are free from IPR they are generally speaking too remote from today sensibility to be usable.

  3. 3.

    A thorough description of this phase is Tambassi T.: Rethinking Geo-Ontologies from a Philosophical Point of View. Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography (J-Reading) 2(5), 51–62 (2016), https://doi.org/10.4458/7800-04. Geo-Ontologies can be broadly distinguished among geomatics, topological and geometrical ontologies: see e.g. OGC GeoSPARQL, Spatial Schema – ISO 19107, Spatial referencing by coordinates - ISO 19111; physical and natural ontologies: see e.g. NDH Ontology (USGS) and Hydro Ontology (Spanish GeoData); human ontologies: see e.g. FAO Geopolitical Ontology. Well known ontologies like DOLCE, CIDOC-CRM, FRBR were not used because they don’t offer a sufficiently detailed characterization of the geographical knowledge.

  4. 4.

    “Classes are used to group individuals that have something in common in order to refer to them. […] In modeling, classes are often used to denote the set of objects comprised by a concept of human thinking, like the concept person or the concept woman.” OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer (Second Edition), https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Primer.

  5. 5.

    “In OWL 2, we denote … relations as properties. Properties are further subdivided: Object properties relate objects to objects (like a person to their spouse), while datatype properties assign data values to objects (like an age to a person)” (id.).

  6. 6.

    The group working to the ontology was made by a computer scientist, Diego Magro; a philosophy postdoc, Timothy Tambassi; a digital humanist, Maurizio Lana; plus a group of people who wrote and then revised the OWL ontology: Claudia Corcione, Paola De Caro, Silvia Naro and Marco Rovera. The group comprises also Gabriella Vanotti, ancient history; Cristina Meini, philosophy of language; Margherita Benzi, philosophy of science; and †Roberta Piastri, Latin literature.

References

  1. Bianchetti, S.: Geografia storica del mondo antico. Monduzzi, Bologna (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casati, R., Smith, B., Varzi, A.C.: Ontological tools for geographic representation. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 77–85. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casati, R., Varzi, A.C.: Parts and Places. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elliott, T., Gillies, S.: Digital geography and classics. In: DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, Changing the Center of Gravity: Transforming Classical Studies Through Cyberinfrastructure, vol. 3(1) (2009). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/1/000031/000031.html

  5. Frank, A.: Spatial ontology. In: Stock, O. (ed.) Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, pp. 135–153. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Geus, K., Thiering, M. (eds.): Feature of Common Sense Geography. Implicit Knowledge Structures in Ancient Geographical Text. Lit Verlag, Wien-Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guarino N.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: Proceedings of FOIS 1998. Trento, Italy, 06–08 June 1998, pp. 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kavouras, M., Kokla, M., Tomai, E.: Comparing categories among geographic ontologies. Comput. Geosci. 31(2), 145–154 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhn, W.: Ontologies in support of activities in geographical space. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 15(7), 613–631 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lana, M., Borgna, A., Ciotti, F., Tambassi, T.: Ontologies and the cultural heritage. The case of GO! In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Semantic Web for Scientific Heritage Co-Located with 13th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2016) Heraklion, Greece, 30th May 2016, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1595, pp. 7–18 (2016). urn:nbn:de:0074-1595-0, ISSN 1613-0073

    Google Scholar 

  11. Momigliano, A.: Alien Wisdom. The Limits of Hellenization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Monella, P.: Why are there no comprehensively digital scholarly editions of classical texts? In: IV Meeting of Digital Philology, Verona, 15 September 2012. http://www1.unipa.it/paolo.monella/lincei/files/why/why_paper.pdf

  13. Pierazzo, E.: Digital Scholarly Editing. Theories, Models and Methods. Ashgate, Farnham Burlington (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, B.: Ontology. In: Floridi, L. (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, pp. 155–166. Blackwell, Malden (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, B., Mark, D.M.: Ontology and geographic kinds. In: Poiker, T.K., Chrisman, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, pp. 308–320. International Geographical Union, Burnaby (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, B., Mark, D.M.: Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 15(7), 591–612 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tambassi, T.: Rethinking geo-ontologies from a philosophical point of view. J. Res. Didactics Geogr. (J-Reading) 2(5), 51–62 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4458/7800-04

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tambassi, T., Magro, D.: Ontologie informatiche della geografia. Una sistematizzazione del dibattito contemporaneo. Rivista di estetica 58, 191–205 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Turner, A.J.: Introduction to NeoGeography. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Tambassi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lana, M., Tambassi, T. (2018). Eliciting the Ancient Geography from a Digital Library of Latin Texts. In: Serra, G., Tasso, C. (eds) Digital Libraries and Multimedia Archives. IRCDL 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 806. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73165-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73165-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73164-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73165-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics