Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empathy-Based Design Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2 - Methodologies

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

In roughly 20 years, the concept of empathy has grown from virtual obscurity in design circles into a valuable new approach. Empathy in design is being promoted within new and existing methodologies, for the purposes of fostering understanding and spurring innovation. This has occurred as HCI shifts toward more creative, playful, and meaningful applications that cross boundaries between work and home.

For the designer, empathy represents an open, experiential way of knowing the user. As an interplay of feelings between people, it is deeply subjective; not a replacement for objective inquiry but a complement to it.

This chapter begins with a theoretical discussion of empathy, including the definition of high-level empathy; then shifts to a practical survey of design approaches. These include the following: a four-stage empathy framework; user-sensitive inclusive design; empathy-based participatory design; empathy-oriented co-design; and empathic product design. The chapter ends with a discussion of related challenges and recommendations. For designers of technological and business solutions, empathy remains one of the few ways to answer the crucial question: what is an experience like for you?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also basic empathy (Stueber 2012) and mirroring (Al Goldman 2011).

  2. 2.

    Affect involves ‘any experience of feeling or emotion’ (VandenBos 2007).

  3. 3.

    See also perspective-shifting (Goldie 2011), re-enactive empathy (Stueber 2012), and reconstructive empathy (Al Goldman 2011).

  4. 4.

    For an insightful commentary on empathy-based methods, see Wright and McCarthy (2008)

  5. 5.

    For more on this topic, see ‘Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty’ (Gaver et al. 2004)

References

  • Agosta L (2011) Empathy and sympathy in ethics. http://www.iep.utm.edu/emp-symp/. Retrieved 1 June 2017

  • Batson C (2009) These things called empathy: eight related but distinct phenomena. In: Decety J, Ickes W (eds) The social neruoscience of empathy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Battarbee K, Suri J, Howard S (2014) Empathy on the edge: scaling and sustaining a human-centered approach in the evolving practice of design. IDEO

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt BC, Singer T (2012) The neural basis of empathy. Annu Rev Neurosci 35:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee S (2006) Cells that read minds. The New York Times

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker S (2006) When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-Computer Interaction: changing roles. ACM, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker S (2015) Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions 22(5):24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, McHugh D, Standen P (2011) Designing location-based learning experiences for people with intellectual disabilities and additional sensory impairments. Comput Educ 56:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coplan A (2011a) Understanding empathy: its features and effects. In: Coplan A, Goldie P (eds) Empathy: philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coplan A (2011b) Will the real empathy please stand up? A case for a narrow conceptualization. South J Philos 49(Suppl 1):40–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coplan A, Goldie P (2011) Introduction. In: Coplan A, Goldie P (eds) Empathy: philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford Scholarship Online

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett R (2016) You must change your life: the story of Rainer Maria Rilke and Auguste Rodin. WW Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuff BMP, Brown SJ, Taylor L, Howat DJ (2016) Empathy: a review of the concept. Emot Rev 8(2):144–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dandavate U, Sanders EB, Stuart S (1996) Emotions matter: user empathy in the product development process. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 40(7):415–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM (2008) Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annu Rev Psychol 59(1):279–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM (2010) The age of empathy: nature’s lessons for a kinder society. Broadway Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety J, Meltzoff A (2011) Empathy, imitation, and the social brain. In: Coplan A, Goldie P (eds) Empathy: Philosophical and psychological. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 58–81

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Depew D (2005) Empathy, psychology, and aesthetics: reflections on a repair concept. Poroi 4. https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1033

  • Eakin J, Mykhalovskiy E (2003) Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences. J Eval Clin Pract 9(2):187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards R (2011) Listening and message interpretation. Int J Listening 25(1–2):47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisma R, Dickinson A, Goodman J, Syme A (2004) Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people. Univ Access Inf Soc 3(2):131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engen HG, Singer T (2013) Empathy circuits. Curr Opin Neurobiol 23(2):275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernø-Kjølhede E (2000) Project management theory and the management of research projects (No. 3/2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira B, Silva W, Oliveira EA, Conte T (2015). Designing personas with empathy map. In: SEKE, pp 501–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese V (2003) The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. Philoso Trans R Soc Lond B 358(431):517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates B, Gates M (2014) Text of the 2014 Commencement address by Bill and Melinda Gates. http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/june/gates-commencement-remarks-061514.html. Retrieved 21 July 2017

  • Gaver B, Dunne T, Pacenti E (1999) Design: cultural probes. Interactions 6(1):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver W, Boucher A, Pennington S, Walker B (2004) Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions 11(5):53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldie P (2011) Anti-empathy. In Coplan A, Goldie P (eds) Empathy: philosophical and psychological persepctives. Oxford Scholarship Online

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A (2006) Simulating minds: the philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A (2011) Two routes to empathy: insights from cognitive neuroscience. In: Coplan A, Goldie P (eds) Empathy: philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman D (2006) Emotional intelligence. Bantam, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes W, Mast M (2007) Empathic accuracy. In: Baumeister R, Bohs K (eds) Encyclopedia of social psychology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 295–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda G (2005) Theodor Lipps and the shift from “sympathy” to “empathy”. J Hist Behav Sci 41(2):151–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauhar S(2017) Empathy gadgets. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/29/opinion/sunday/empathy-gadgets.html. Retrieved 25 Oct 2017

  • Jiancaro T, Mihailidis A (in review-a) Technology, design and dementia: an exploratory study of the user-device fit

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiancaro T, Mihailidis A (in review-b) Understanding causes and constraints: a systems analysis of people with dementia making phone calls

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiancaro T, Jaglal SB, Mihailidis A (2017) Technology, design and dementia: an exploratory survey of developers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 12(6):573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J, Dai B, Peng D, Zhu C, Liu L, Lu C (2012) Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. J Neurosci 32(45):16064–16069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn E (1985) Heinz Kohut and Carl Rogers: a timely comparison. Am Psychol 40(8):893–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitwood T (1997) The experience of dementia. Aging Ment Health 1(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohut H (1982) Introspection, empathy and the semi-circle of mental health. Int J Psychoanal 63:395–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouprie M, Visser F (2009) A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. J Eng Des 20(5):437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krznaric R (2008) You are therefore I am: how empathy education can create social change. Oxfam GB

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard D, Rayport J (1997) Spark innovation through empathic design. Harv Bus Rev 75:102–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay S, Brittain K, Jackson D, Ladha C, Ladha K, Olivier P (2012) Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp 521–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipari L (2010) Listening, thinking, being. Commun Theory 20(3):348–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipps T (1903) Einfühlung, innere Nachahmung und Organenempfindungen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps T (1906) Ästhetik: T. Die ästhetische Betrachtung und die bildende Kunst. Voss

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar RA, Oatley K, Djikic M, Mullin J (2011) Emotion and narrative fiction: interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognit Emot 25(5):818–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattelmäki T, Vaajakallio K, Koskinen I (2014) What happened to empathic design? Design Issues 30(1):67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonagh D, Thomas J (2010) Disability+ relevant design: empathic design strategies supporting more effective new product design outcomes. Des J 13(2):180–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Cairns A (1993) Designing for extraordinary users. Ergon Des Q Hum Factors Appl 1(4):10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Carmichael A (2006) The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interact Comput 18:996–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Gregor P (2000) “User sensitive inclusive design”—in search of a new paradigm. In: Proceedings on the 2000 conference on universal usability, pp 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Gregor P, Morgan M (2011) User-sensitive inclusive design. Univ Access Inf Soc 10(3):235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionary of English (2015) www.oxfordreference.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca. Retrieved 2 Oct 2016

  • Polit DF, Beck CT (2010) Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud 47(11):1451–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak K, Alexander S, Tulsky J, Lyna P, Coffman C et al (2011) Physician empathy and listening: associations with patient satisfaction and autonomy. J Am Board Fam Med 24(6):665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postma C, Zwartkruis-Pelgrim E (2012) Challenges of doing empathic design: experiences from industry. J Des 6(1):59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L (1996) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res 3:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers C (1959) A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships: as developed in the client-centered framework. In: Psychology: a study of a science, Study 1. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 184–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers C (1975) Empathic: an unappreciated way of being. Couns Psychol 5(2):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders EB (2005) Information, inspiration and co-creation. In: The 6th international conference of the European Academy of design, pp 29–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders EB, Dandavate U (1999) Design for Experiencing: new tools. In: Overbeeke CJ, Hekkert P (eds) First international conference on design and emotion. Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer T, Lamm C (2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann NY Acad Sci 1156:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (2010) A theory of moral sentiments (original). Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Somogyi RL, Buchko AA, Buchko KJ (2013) Managing with empathy: can you feel what I feel? J Organ Psychol 13(1):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker M, Hegeman E (1996) Valuing emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickfaden M, Devlieger P (2011) Empathy through accumulating techne: designing an accessible metro. Des J 14:207–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Stueber K (2012) Varieties of empathy, neuroscience and the Narrativist challenge to the contemporary theory of mind debate. Emot Rev 4(1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri JF (2001) The next 50 years: future challenges and opportunities for empathy in our science. Ergonomics 44(14):1278–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013011010585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titchener E (1909) Lectures on the experimental psychology of the thought-processes. McMillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • VandenBos GR (ed) (2007) APA dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani A (2016) What is co-creation? http://sonicrim.com/2016/04/what-is-co-creation/. Retrieved 4 July 2017

  • Vischer R (1873/1994) On the optical sense of form. A contribution to aesthetics. In: Malgrave HF (ed) Empathy, form, and space. Problems in German aesthetics, 1873–1893. Getty Center Publications, Santa Monica, pp 89–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Warszawa MN, Nowak M (2011) The complicated history of Einfühlung. Argumentation 1(2):301–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Winerman L (2007) The mind mirror. Monit Psychol 36(9):48–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright P., McCarthy J (2008) Empathy and experience in HCI. In: CHI’2008, Florence, Italy, pp 637–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaki J (2014) Empathy: a motivated account. Psychol Bull 140(6):1608–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rehabilitation Sciences Institute/Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Torvonto, ON, Canada

    Tizneem Jiancaro

Authors
  1. Tizneem Jiancaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tizneem Jiancaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Interactive Arts & Technology, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canada

    Michael Filimowicz

  2. School of Communications, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

    Veronika Tzankova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jiancaro, T. (2018). Empathy-Based Design Approaches. In: Filimowicz, M., Tzankova, V. (eds) New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2 - Methodologies . Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73373-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73374-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation