Abstract
India has long sought to play a role commensurate to its size, economic capacity and political standing. Regional states, especially Pakistan, have challenged this aspiration. Consequently, India has been forced to devote significant resources to cope with Pakistan’s intransigence. It has also resorted to harsh measures ranging from outright intervention to coercive economic diplomacy to induce various neighbors to conform to its expectations. As its economic prowess increases and there is a commensurate growth in its military capabilities, India will probably be able to pursue its preferences without resorting to overt coercion. Instead, its very success should lead the smaller states, with the likely exception of Pakistan, to bandwagon with India rather than engage in various attempts to balance its power in the region.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For details, see Guha (2007).
- 2.
- 3.
For details , see Singh (2015).
- 4.
Some of these views can be gleaned from Pandit (1956).
- 5.
For evidence of Pakistan’s complicity in planning and launching the invasion, see Hodson (1986).
- 6.
For an account, see Raghavan (2013).
- 7.
For more details on Pakistan’s contestation of India’s regional role and the evolution of the asymmetric distribution of national power capabilities in South Asia since independence, see the chapter of Blarel and Ebert in this volume.
- 8.
Much of this discussion has been derived from Bajpai et al. (1995).
- 9.
For the standard treatment of this period, see Garver (2001).
- 10.
For a discussion of the war, see Major General D.K. Palit (1991).
References
Axelrod, Robert. 2006. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Ayoob, Mohammed. 2000. India Matters. The Washington Quarterly 23 (1): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/016366000560719.
Ayres, Alyssa. 2014. The Modi Doctrine. http://www.outlookindia.com , June 10. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/the-modi-doctrine/291047.
Bajpai, Kanti, P.R. Chari, Pervaiz Cheema, Stephen Cohen, and Sumit Ganguly. 1995. Brasstacks and Beyond: Perception and Management of Crisis in South Asia. New Delhi: Manohar.
Brines, Russell. 1968. The Indo-Pakistani Conflict. New York: Pall Mall.
Crossette, Barbara. 1989. Nepal’s Economy Is Gasping as India, a Huge Neighbor, Squeezes It Hard. The New York Times, April 11. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/11/world/nepal-s-economy-is-gasping-as-india-a-huge-neighbor-squeezes-it-hard.html.
Dabas, Maninder. 2016. The Story of the Sumdorong Chu Standoff – When India Avoided War with China Through Diplomacy. India Times, August 20. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.indiatimes.com/news/the-story-of-the-sumdorong-chu-standoff-when-india-avoided-war-with-china-through-sheer-diplomacy-260266.html.
Dash, Kishore. 1996. The Political Economy of Regional Cooperation in South Asia. Pacific Affairs 69 (2): 185–209.
Frankel, Francine R. 2009. India’s Political Economy: The Gradual Revolution (1947–2004). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ganguly, Sumit. 1997. The Crisis in Kashmir. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
———. 1999. India’s Pathway to Pokhran II. The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi’s Nuclear Weapons. International Security 23 (4): 148–177.
———. 2001. Conflict Unending: India-Pakistan Tensions Since 1947. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 2016. Deadly Impasse. Indo-Pakistani Relations at the Dawn of the Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garver, John W. 2001. Protracted Contest: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Twentieth Century. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Gill, John. 2009. Brasstacks: Prudently Pessimistic. In Nuclear Proliferation in South Asia: Crisis Behaviour and the Bomb, ed. Sumit Ganguly and S. Paul Kapur, 36–58. London: Routledge.
Guha, Ramachandra. 2007. India After Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy. New Delhi: Pan Macmillan.
Gwertzman, Bernard. 1981. Pakistan Agrees to a U.S. Aid Plan and F-16 Delivery. The New York Times, September 16. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/1981/09/16/world/pakistan-agrees-to-a-us-aid-plan-and-f-16-delivery.html.
Hagerty, Devin T. 1991. India’s Regional Security Doctrine. Asian Survey 31 (4): 351–363.
Hodson, Henry Vincent. 1986. The Great Divide: Britain-India-Pakistan. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kapur, Paul. 2016. Jihad as Grand Strategy: Islamist Militancy, National Security, and the Pakistani State. New York: Oxford University Press.
Madhumati, D.S. 2017. India Launches Satellite to Help South Asian Nations. The Hindu, May 5.
Mukherji, Rahul. 2000. India’s Aborted Liberalization–1966. Pacific Affairs 73 (3): 375–392.
Palit, D.K. 1991. War in High Himalaya: The Indian Army in Crisis, 1962. London: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers.
Pandit, Vijaya Lakshmi. 1956. India’s Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs 43 (3): 432–440.
Raghavan, Srinath. 2013. 1971: A Global History of the Creation of Bangladesh. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rubinoff, Arthur. 1971. India’s Use of Force in Goa. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
Singh, S. Nihal. 1984. Why India Goes to Moscow for Arms. Asian Survey 24 (7): 707–720.
Singh, Sinderpal. 2015. India in South Asia: Domestic Identity Politics and Foreign Policy from Nehru to the BJP. London: Routledge.
Singh, Sushant. 2016. Operation Cactus: India’s Mission Impossible in the Maldives. New Delhi: Juggernaut.
Swamy, M., and R. Narayan. 1995. Tigers of Lanka: From Boys to Guerrillas. New Delhi: South Asia Books.
Whitehead, Andrew. 2007. A Mission in Kashmir. Penguin Books India PVT, Limited.
Yechury, Akhila. 2015. Imagining India, Decolonizing L’Inde Francaise, c. 1947–1954. The Historical Journal 58 (4): 1141–1165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ganguly, S. (2018). India as a Regional Power: Opportunities and Constraints. In: Ebert, H., Flemes, D. (eds) Regional Powers and Contested Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73691-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73691-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73690-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73691-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)