Skip to main content

Some Predictors of University Students’ Information Literacy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Literacy in the Workplace (ECIL 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 810))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2288 Accesses

Abstract

The study investigated the predictive power of scientific literacy (SL), ICT use, self-concept, self-efficacy and motivation of 139 undergraduate university students on their information literacy (IL) before taking a compulsory credit-bearing IL course. Knowledge tests were administered for IL and SL, and questionnaires for ICT use and psychological factors. All predictors together accounted for 33.3% of the variance in the pre-test IL level. Significant positive predictors included SL and self-concept about learning, while external controlled motivation correlated negatively with IL. ICT tools and Internet confidence were poor predictors of IL. Internal motivation played a suppressor role in the model. The IL study course significantly improved the IL of students, with a mean difference of 16.38%; the students who scored poorly on the pre-test, benefited more than others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 155.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACRL: Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. American Library Association (2000). http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency

  2. Catts, R., Lau, J.: Towards information literacy indicators. In: Conceptual Frame-Work Paper. UNESCO, Paris (2008). http://www.ifla.org/publications/towards-information-literacy-indicators

  3. Ferrari, A.: DIGCOMP: a framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. In: Punie, Y., Brečko, B.N. (eds.) Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (2013). http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC83167/lb-na-26035-enn.pdf

  4. Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., Ainley, J.: International Computer and Information Literacy Study: Assessment Framework (2013). http://research.acer.edu.au/ict_literacy/9

  5. Šorgo, A., Bartol, T., Dolničar, D., Boh Podgornik, B.: Attributes of digital natives as predictors of information literacy in higher education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 48(3), 749–767 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bandura, A.: The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 4(3), 359–373 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Krampen, G.: Intelligence, academic self-concept, and information literacy: the role of adequate perceptions of academic ability in the acquisition of knowledge about information searching. Inf. Res. Int. Electron. J. 20(1), 1–20 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosman, T., Mayer, A.K.: Moderating effects of domain-specific self-efficacy on the relationship between intelligence and information-seeking skills. In: 16th Biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Limassol, Cyprus (2015). https://www.zpid.de/pub/research/2015_rosman_EARLI-paper_limassol.pdf

  9. Serap Kurbanoglu, S.: Self-efficacy: a concept closely linked to information literacy and lifelong learning. J. Doc. 59(6), 635–646 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crow, S.R.: Information literacy: what’s motivation got to do with it? Knowl. Quest. Chic. 35(4), 48–52 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mortimore, J.M., Wall, A.: Motivating African-American students through information literacy instruction: exploring the link between encouragement and academic self-concept. Ref. Libr. 50(1), 29–42 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ross, M., Perkins, H., Bodey, K.: Academic motivation and information literacy self-efficacy: the importance of a simple desire to know. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 38(1), 2–9 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kiliç-Çakmak, E.: Learning strategies and motivational factors predicting information literacy self-efficacy of e-learners. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 26(2), 192–208 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Standards for the 21st-Century Learner. American Association of School Librarians (AASL) (2006). http://www.ala.org/aasl/standards/learning

  15. ACRL: Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. American Library Association (2016). http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

  16. Boh Podgornik, B., Dolničar, D., Šorgo, A., Bartol, T.: Development, testing, and validation of an information literacy test (ILT) for higher education. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(10), 2420–2436 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. OECD: PISA released science items (2006). http://www.oecd.org/pisa/38709385.pdf

  18. Juriševič, M., Baggia, A., Bartol, T., Dolničar, D., Glažar, S.A., Kljajić Borštnar, M., et al.: Motivational aspects of information literacy in higher education. In: International Conference on Excellence Innovation Creativity Basic-Higher Education Psychology (2016). http://www.icieconference.net/images/Conference_Program_Detailed_Book.pdf

  19. Marsh, H.W., O’Neill, R.: Self description questionnaire III: the construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. J. Educ. Meas. 21(2), 153–174 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, M.: The general self self-efficacy scale (GSE). In: Weinman, J., Wright, S., Johnston, M., (eds.) Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio Causal and Control Beliefs, Windsdor, UK, pp. 35–37 (1995). https://userpage.fu-berlin.de/health/engscal.htm

  21. Vrtačnik, M., Juriševič, M., Ferk Savec, V.: Motivational profiles of Slovenian high school students and their academic performance outcomes. Acta Chim. Slov. 57(3), 733–740 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mahmood, K.: Do people overestimate their information literacy skills? A systematic review of empirical evidence on the Dunning-Kruger effect. Commun. Inf. Lit. 10(2), 199–213 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hess, N., Kathryn, A.: Motivational design in information literacy instruction. Commun. Inf. Lit. 9(1), 44–59 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency, project J5-5535. The following researches participated in the preparation of tests and questionnaires used in the project: Tomaž Bartol and Andrej Šorgo (IL test, ICT use survey), Saša A. Glažar (SL test), Mojca Juriševič and Margareta Vrtačnik (Self-concept/Self-efficacy/Motivation/Learning Strategy Questionnaire), Blaž Rodič (setting e-versions on the online survey system 1ka.si).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danica Dolničar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dolničar, D., Podgornik, B.B. (2018). Some Predictors of University Students’ Information Literacy. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds) Information Literacy in the Workplace. ECIL 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 810. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74333-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74334-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics