Skip to main content

Negotiation as Form

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning in Work

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 23))

  • 453 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is the first of three that comprehensively outline and elaborate each of the dimensions of The Three Dimension of Negotiation framework. Drawing on a range of empirical data, it describes and explains a range of types or different forms of negotiation that workers engage in through their participative work practices. These forms enable the categorisation of workers’ personal practices as negotiation processes and accomplishments associated with the varying levels of purpose and outcome realisation enacted through work. Work is purposeful goal oriented activity and so the levels of purpose enacted and the degrees by which outcomes or goals are realised can become characteristics of different forms of negotiation. At a general level of analysis, workers are found to engage in (i) highly purposeful activity that secures objectives – what is referred to as telic negotiations, and (ii) incidental activity that does not tend to outcome realisation – what is referred to as atelic negotiations. At deeper levels of analysis, workers are found to engage in any and all of four contingent forms of negotiation that evidence contrasting high and low levels of intentionality and high and low levels of outcome realisation. The four contingent forms of negotiation are realised, discovered, concealed, and protracted, which in the analysis are categorised through the use of a personal work negotiation matrix. The matrix enables identifying how workers’ perceptions of their personal practices as negotiation forms compound to generate the socio-personal meanings and legacies workers use to make sense of their practices and the outcomes these accomplish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001a). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001b). Co-participation at work: Affordance and engagement. In T. Fenwick (Ed.), Sociocultural perspectives on learning through work (pp. 63–72). San Francisco: Josey Bass/Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001c). Learning throughout working life: Interdependencies at work. Studies in Continuing Education, 23(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2004). Learning through work: Workplace participatory practices. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 109–125). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2006a). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(1), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2006b). Work, subjectivity and learning. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2008). Learning throughout working life: A relational interdependence between personal and social agency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etelapelto, A., & Saarinen, J. (2006). Developing subjective identities through collective participation. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning (pp. 157–178). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: Integrating organisational and personal development. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 126–144). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, L. (2001). Managing strategic relationships. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illeris, K. (2002). The three dimensions of learning. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2009). Learning to be a person in society: Learning to be me. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists in their own words (pp. 21–34). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D., & Williams, J. (2003). Everyday negotiation: Navigating the hidden agendas in bargaining. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2006). Negotiation (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (2009). Chronicling the complexification of negotiation theory and practice. Negotiation Journal, 25(4), 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. (2005). I-deals: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saner, R. (2005). The expert negotiator (2nd ed.). Leiden, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, N. (1999). Culture and difference in learning. In D. Boud & J. Garrick (Eds.), Understanding learning at work (pp. 119–131). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W. (1988). Common elements on the analysis of the negotiation process. Negotiation Journal, 4(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smith, R. (2018). Negotiation as Form. In: Learning in Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75298-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75298-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75297-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75298-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics