Skip to main content

Stakeholder Discourses About Critical Literacies and Audience Participation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Audiences

Abstract

The next section of this book looks into the horizons that lie ahead for audiences, a short while from today, towards 2030. In chapters 11 through to 14, colleagues will look at key societal drivers of future change, such as the increasing ubiquity of connected gadgets attendant to the Internet of Things, and critical concerns around datafication and the arrival of Big Data. In this chapter, we conclude presenting work on the here and the now, hereby presenting outcomes from the stakeholder consultation part of our foresight work. We distil and discuss themes that emerged from stakeholder interviews around micro and macro forms of action, the inherent technological implications, ensuing academic social responsibilities, and the relevance of investing in critical thinking as part of critical literacies, more broadly, as a fundamental component for positive action. These findings, around the importance of critical literacies, irrespective of technological conditions, resonate into the very futures that The Future of Audiences considers in the chapters that follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amaral, I. (2016). Redes sociais: Sociabilidades emergentes [Social networks: Emergent sociabilities]. Covilhã: Editora LabCom.IFP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. (2013). Understanding the affective investment produced through commenting on Australian alternative journalism website New Matilda. New Media as Society, 17(5), 810–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimber, B. (2017). Three prompts for collective action in the context of digital media. Political Communication, 34(1), 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brites, M. J. (2015). Jovens e culturas cívicas: Por entre formas de consumo noticioso e de participação [Youth and civic cultures: In between forms of news consumption and participation]. Covilhã: Livros LabCom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. (2011a). Media and participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle. Bristol: Intellect Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. (2011b). The concept of participation. If they have access and interact, do they really participate? Communication Management Quarterly, 21, 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimirri, N. A. (2013). Who do we think we (and they) are? The audience and the researcher as participants in sociomaterial practice. The Communication Review, 16(1–2), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P., & Álvares, C. (2013). Political participation in an age of mediatisation: Towards a new research agenda. Javnost, 20(2), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, R., & Ytre-Arne, B. (Eds.). (2017). Audiences, towards 2030: Priorities for audience analysis. Guildford: CEDAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Goldberg, C. A. (2005). Pragmatism, Bourdieu, and collective emotions in contentious politics. Theory and Society, 34(5–6), 469–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-005-1619-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Audiovisual Observatory. (2016). Mapping of media literacy practices and actions in EU-28. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory/European Commission. Retrieved from www.obs.coe.int/documents/205595/8587740/Media+literacy+mapping+report+-+EN+-+FINAL.pdf/c1b5cc13-b81e-4814-b7e3-cc64dd4de36c.

  • Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (2011). Alfabetização: Leitura do mundo, leitura da palavra [Alphabetization: Reading of the world, reading of the world]. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, S., Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2016). Critical media literacy as transformative pedagogy. In M. N. Yildiz & J. Keengwe (Eds.), Handbook of research on media literacy in the digital age (pp. 1–30). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J., & Pfaff, S. (2001). Emotion work in high-risk social movements: Managing fear in the US and East German civil rights movements. In J. Goodwin, J. M. Jasper, & F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements (pp. 282–302). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höijer, B. (2008). Ontological assumptions and generalizations in qualitative (audience) research. European Journal of Communication, 23(3), 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ianelli, L. (2016). Hybrid politics: Media and participation. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2017). Critical media literacy is not an option. Learn Inquiry, 1(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2005). On the relation between audiences and publics. In S. Livingstone (Ed.), Audiences and publics: When cultural engagement matters for the public sphere (pp. 17–41). Bristol: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, D., Brites, M. J., Chimirri, N. A., & Saariketo, M. (2016). In dialogue with related fields of inquiry: The interdisciplinarity, normativity and contextuality of audience research. Participations. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 13(1), 462–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. (2003). Shopping with and for virtues. In M. Micheletti (Ed.), Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, shopping, and collective action (pp. 149–168). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z., & Oliveira, M. F. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selander, L., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2016). Digital action repertoires and transforming a social movement organization. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria José Brites .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brites, M.J., Chimirri, N.A., Amaral, I., Seddighi, G., Torres da Silva, M., Murru, M.F. (2018). Stakeholder Discourses About Critical Literacies and Audience Participation. In: Das, R., Ytre-Arne, B. (eds) The Future of Audiences. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75638-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics