Skip to main content

Semiconductor Heterostructures and Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamentals of Solid State Engineering
  • 108k Accesses

Abstract

In Chap. 4, we have introduced the basic concepts and formalism of quantum mechanics. In Chap. 0, we have determined the energy spectrum, or energy-momentum or E–k relations, for electrons in a crystal which governs their interaction with external forces and fields. Moreover, we saw that the quantum behavior of particles is best observed in small, typically nanometer scale (one billionth of a meter or 10−9 m) dimension structures, as illustrated in the example of a particle in a 1D box.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bockrath M, Cobden DH, Lu J, Rinzler AG, Smalley RE, Balents L, McEuen PL (1999) Luttinger liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes. Lett Nat 397:598–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shockley W (1951) U.S. Patent 2,569,347

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Ahmed H (1986) An integration microfabrication system for low dimensional structures and devices. In: Kelly MJ, Weisbuch C (eds) The physics and fabrication of microstructures and microdevices. Springer, Berlin, pp 435–442

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft NW, Mermin ND (1976) Solid state physics. Holt, Rinehart, Winston, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bassani F, Pastori Parravicini G (1975) Electronic states and optical transitions in solids, Chap. 6. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastard G (1988) Wave mechanics applied to semiconductor Heterostructures. Halsted Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont SP (1992) Quantum wires and dots-defect related effects. Phys Scr T45:196–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang SL (1995) Physics of optoelectronic devices. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies JH (1998) The physics of low dimensional semiconductors: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle R Confined carrier quantum states in ultrathin semiconductor heterostructures. In: Queisser HJ (ed) Feskorperproblem XV, pp 21–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Einspruch NG, Frensley WR (1994) Heterostructures and quantum devices. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasko DG, Potts A, Cleaver JR, Smith C, Ahmed H (1988) Fabrication of sub-micrometer free standing single crystal GaAs and Si structures for quantum transport studies. J Vac Sci Technol B 6:1849–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosencher E, Vinter B (2002) Optoelectronics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer A, Jewell J, Lee YH, Harbison J, Florez LT (1989) Fabrication of microlasers and microresonator optical switches. Appl Phys Lett 55:2724–2726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sze S (1981) Physics of semiconductor devices, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewordt M, Law V, Kelly M, Newbury R, Pepper M, Peacock C (1990) Direct experimental determination of the tunneling time and transmission probability of electrons through a resonant tunneling system. J Phys Condens Matter 2:896–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasko FT, Kuznetsov AV (1999) Electronic states and optical transitions in semiconductor heterostructures. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbuch C, Vinter B (1991) Quantum semiconductor structures. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Problems

Problems

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, we used the effective mass of the electron in the Schrödinger equation. Explain why it was necessary to do so, whereas it was not necessary in the infinite and finite potential well in Chap. 4.

  2. 2.

    Give an expression (an integral) for the total number of electrons in the conduction band of a bulk three-dimensional semiconductor and then in the first subband of a quantum well of width L in terms of the density of states and the Fermi function (assume box eigenstates in the confined direction). If at T = 0 K we dope the first subband in the conduction band and we fill all the states in the first subband, how many electrons do we need per unit area?

  3. 3.

    Consider a 50 Å GaAs and 300 Å Al0.6Ga0.4As layers forming a quantum well structure.

    figure a

The electrons are all located at the first energy state (e), and holes are at (h). The general expression of the first energy state is determined as E1 = ℏ2π2/2ma2, where a is the width of the quantum well and m* is the effective mass of the particle considered (for holes, consider the heavy-hole effective mass).

What is the photon energy of the light emitted when the electron and the hole recombine as shown in the above figure?

  1. 4.

    Let us assume a quantum dot which is spherical. The electrons or holes are confined at energy states with the following expression: Enl = (ℏ2/2m)(αnl/R)2, where m* is the effective mass of the electron or hole and the value of αnl is given by α10 = π, α11 = 4.49, α12 = 5.76, α20 = 6.28, α21 = 7.72, and α22 = 9.09. Now consider the very small GaAs quantum dots of radius 10 nm. If the electron drops from the second state (α11) to the first state (α10), what is the photon energy of the light emitted from this transition?

    Draw the energy diagram for GaAs quantum dots with radius 5 nm, 10 nm, and 15 nm. How does the first energy state change as a function of radius?

  2. 5.

    Density of States of an Ideal Two-Dimensional Electron Gas

    Using the infinite barrier approximation, derive an expression for the density of states for electrons in a quantum well in terms of the well width L and electron effective mass m*.

  3. 6.

    Fermi Energy of an Ideal Two-Dimensional Electron Gas

    Consider a structure consisting of two GaAs quantum wells that have been grown far apart in AlxGa1-xAs with the same Al composition x (x ≤ 0.3). In well A the GaAs thickness is L, while in well B, it is 2L. Now, approximate the conduction bands in wells A and B by ideal quantum wells between infinitely high potential barriers. Suppose that the quantum wells contain electrons and that both wells have the same Fermi energy,\( {E}_{\mathrm{F}}=3{F}_1^{\mathrm{A}} \) where \( {E}_1^{\mathrm{A}} \) is the lowest quantized energy level in well A.

    1. (a)

      How many subbands in each well contain electrons at zero temperature?

    2. (b)

      What is the two-dimensional charge density NA and NB in each well?

    Give the answer in terms of known physical quantities such as ℏ and L.

  4. 7.

    The Graphic of the Two-Dimensional Density of States

    Figure 15 shows the density of states of a quantum well. The confinement energy of the lowest level (E1) is 17 meV, and the first excited state (E2) has a confinement energy of 30 meV. The Fermi level is located 50 meV above the bottom of the conduction band. Determine the number of electrons contained in the well.

  5. 8.

    The two-dimensional potential which confines the electrons in a quantum wire made of GaAs is assumed to be parabolic, and the subband separation is given as ℏω0 = 12 meV. If the Fermi energy is EF = 37 meV as measured from the bottom of the lowest subband, calculate the number of electron per unit length at 0 K including spin degeneracy.

  6. 9.

    The Moss-Burstein Shift in Absorption Spectra

    The “band filling” or Moss-Burstein shift effect occurs in all heavily doped three-dimensional semiconductors. It is a consequence of the fact that electrons are fermions, and therefore it is impossible (by the Pauli exclusion principle) to optically excite an electron into a same spin k-state, which is already occupied. In the case of strongly degenerate n+-doped sample, this has the effect of prohibiting any interband transition into electron states below the Fermi energy leading to an upward shift in the effective absorption edge, \( {E}_{\mathrm{g}}^{\prime } \) (see figure below). The Moss-Burstein shiftE) is defined as the difference between the effective absorption edge and the energy gap (Eg) of the material, i.e., \( \Delta E={E}_{\mathrm{g}}^{\prime }-{E}_{\mathrm{g}} \).

    1. (a)

      Calculate the Burstein shift in the absorption edge of a direct semiconductor with parabolic bands due to the heavy doping (n-type) at very low temperature (T ≈ 0 K). The carrier concentration is ne. Neglect excitons. Note that the shift is not simply the Fermi energy of the electrons and involves the mass of both conduction and valence bands.

    2. (b)

      Calculate the Moss-Burstein shift for the GaAs material doped with 1 × 1018 electrons/cm3. What should happen to the shape of the absorption edge? Assume \( {m}_{\mathrm{e}}^{\ast }=0.067\kern0.24em {m}_0 \) and \( {m}_{\mathrm{h}}^{\ast }=0.45\kern0.24em {m}_0 \) where m0is the electron rest mass.

      figure b

Allowed optical transitions in direct-gap semiconductors: (a) undoped material, absorption threshold of Eg; (b) n+-doped material, absorption threshold blue shifted to \( {E}_{\mathrm{g}}^{\prime } \) by the Moss-Burstein shift

  1. 10.

    Critical Radius of a Spherical Quantum Dot with Finite Barrier Height

    Assume that a quantum dot has a spherical shape with radius R and is surrounded by a medium of higher bandgap such as AlGaAs. The potential barrier at the conduction band is ΔEc at all points in the surface of the sphere. The potential well is a square well of height, ΔEc, for r > R and is 0 for r < R. Let us consider the simplest case of zero angular momentum (l = 0), and then it follows that the wavefunctions \( \Psi \left(\overrightarrow{r}\right) \) depends only on the radial part. When l = 0 and \( \Psi \left(\overrightarrow{r}\right)=R(r)=\phi (r)/r \), Eq. (15.56) reduces to:

    $$ \left\{\begin{array}{ll}-\frac{{\mathrm{\hslash}}^2}{2{m}^{\ast }}\frac{d^2\phi (r)}{dr^2}+\Delta {E}_{\mathrm{c}}\phi (r)= E\phi (r)& \left(r>R\right)\\ {}-\frac{{\mathrm{\hslash}}^2}{2{m}^{\ast }}\frac{d^2\phi (r)}{dr^2}= E\phi (r)& \left(r<R\right)\end{array}\right. $$

The solution of the above equation is the same as the one with a one-dimensional finite potential well. Find the critical radius below which there is no bound state of one electron in the quantum dot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Razeghi, M. (2019). Semiconductor Heterostructures and Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures. In: Fundamentals of Solid State Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75708-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75708-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75707-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75708-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics