Abstract
Change blindness is a phenomenon of visual perception that occurs when a stimulus undergoes a change without this being noticed by its observer. Since it was first described in the 1990s, change blindness has provided a unique means to investigate the role of attention in visual processing. To date, the effect has been produced by changing images displayed on screen as well as changing people and objects in an individual’s environment. In this study, we combine these two approaches to directly compare the levels of change blindness produced in real-world and on-screen scenarios. We use a single series of museum artefacts and two groups of participants to simultaneously produce saccade-contingent change blindness in a real-world scenario, and camera pan-contingent change blindness in an on-screen scenario. We present the results in two parts. First, we find no significant difference between the mean levels of change blindness produced in on-screen and real-world scenarios by the same visual stimuli. Second, we identify a group of artefacts that were associated with a high level of change blindness in both scenarios and a group that were associated with a low level of change blindness in both scenarios. We suggest that the difference in change blindness levels results from bottom-up influences including the visible area and contrast of changes. We discuss the relation of these findings to our understanding of change detection as a part of visual processing, as well as the insights they offer to our understanding of the experience of viewing objects within a museum setting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006.
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66.
Binder, M. D., Hirokawa, N., & Windhorst, U. (Eds.). (2009). Gaze shift. In Encyclopedia of neuroscience (p. 1676). Inbook, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_1941.
Borji, A., & Itti, L. (2013). State-of-the-art in visual attention modeling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(1), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.89.
Davoli, C. C., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Reaching out with the imagination. Psychological Science, 20(3), 293–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02293.x.
Dufour, A., & Touzalin, P. (2008). Improved visual sensitivity in the perihand space. Experimental Brain Research, 190(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1453-2.
Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across sccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception. Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195084627.001.0001.
Grossman, G. E., Leigh, R. J., Abel, L. A., Lanska, D. J., & Thurston, S. E. (1988). Frequency and velocity of rotational head perturbations during locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 70(3), 470–476. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3384048.
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10), 1489–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7.
Jones, B. T., Jones, B. C., Smith, H., & Copley, N. (2003). A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users. Addiction, 98(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00270.x.
Kelley, T. A., Chun, M. M., & Chua, K.-P. (2003). Effects of scene inversion on change detection of targets matched for visual salience. Journal of Vision, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.1.1.
Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4(4), 219–227. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3836989.
Larson, A. M., & Loschky, L. C. (2009). The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 6–6. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.10.6.
Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 501–506. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214339.
Levin, D. T., Simons, D. J., Angelone, B. L., & Chabris, C. F. (2002). Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 93(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602760146224.
Levy, E. K. (2011). An artistic exploration of inattention blindness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00174.
Lloyd, D. M., Azañón, E., & Poliakoff, E. (2010). Right hand presence modulates shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention in near perihand space. Brain and Cognition, 73(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.03.006.
McConkie, G. W., & Currie, C. B. (1996). Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 563–581. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.294.6589.
O’Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7(1–3), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800394766.
O’Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of “mudsplashes”. Nature, 398(6722), 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/17953.
Pelisson, D., & Guillaume, A. (2009). Eye-head coordination. In M. D. Binder, N. Hirokawa, & U. Windhorst (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp. 1545–1548). Inbook, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_3257.
Peschel, A. O., & Orquin, J. L. (2013). A review of the findings and theories on surface size effects on visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00902.
Pisella, L., Berberovic, N., & Mattingley, J. B. (2004). Impaired working memory for location but not for colour or shape in visual neglect: A comparison of parietal and non-parietal lesions. Cortex, 40(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70132-1.
Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.166.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x.
Rutkowski, J. S., Crewther, D. P., & Crewther, S. G. (2003). Change detection is impaired in children with dyslexia. Journal of Vision, 3(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.1.10.
Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition, 7(1–3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800394856.
Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7(5), 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00378.x.
Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10694957.
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01080-2.
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 644–649. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208840.
Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.006.
Stirk, J. A., & Underwood, G. (2007). Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 7(10), 3. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.10.3.
The Nielsen Total Audience Report - Q1 2016. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2016/the-total-audience-report-q1-2016.html.
Tse, P. U., Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (2003). Attentional enhancement opposite a peripheral flash revealed using change blindness. Psychological Science, 14(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.T01-1-01425.
Tseng, P., Tuennermann, J., Roker-Knight, N., Winter, D., Scharlau, I., & Bridgeman, B. (2010). Enhancing implicit change detection through action. Perception, 39(10), 1311–1321. https://doi.org/10.1068/P6711.
Underwood, G., & Foulsham, T. (2006). Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(11), 1931–1949. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500416342.
Underwood, G., Foulsham, T., van Loon, E., Humphreys, L., & Bloyce, J. (2006). Eye movements during scene inspection: A test of the saliency map hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500236661.
Varakin, D. A., Levin, D. T., & Collins, K. M. (2007). Comparison and representation failures both cause real-world change blindness. Perception, 36(5), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1068/P5572.
Vishton, P. M., Stephens, N. J., Nelson, L. A., Morra, S. E., Brunick, K. L., & Stevens, J. A. (2007). Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it. Psychological Science, 18(8), 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01965.x.
Werner, S., & Thies, B. (2000). Is change blindness attenuated by domain-specific expertise? An expert-novices comparison of change detection in football images. Visual Cognition, 7(1–3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800394748.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the participants who have shown a lot of interest in this new approach of testing. The authors are also very grateful to the staff of the Ashmolean Museum of Art and Archaeology for their support and help in making this study happen. This manuscript is dedicated to the memory of Professor Glyn Humphreys.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Attwood, J.E., Kennard, C., Harris, J., Antoniades, C.A. (2018). A Comparison of Change Blindness and the Visual Perception of Museum Artefacts in Real-World and On-Screen Scenarios. In: Kapoula, Z., Volle, E., Renoult, J., Andreatta, M. (eds) Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76053-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76054-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)