Skip to main content

The (Im)Possibility of Creating Counter-Hegemony Against the Radical Right: The Case of Austria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Citizens’ Activism and Solidarity Movements

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

  • 939 Accesses

Abstract

The Austrian chapter by Birgit Sauer emphasizes the electoral successes of the radical right, which since the 1990s have triggered the formation of civil society organizations that oppose the mobilization of hate against immigrants. It shows the weakness of Austrian civil society organizations in forging alliances and shifting their activities towards solidarity with other activists, common strategic framing, and transversal politics. It refers to some alliances that go beyond identity issues, but emphasizes that transversal framings of racism that actively include feminism, gender, sexuality, and class are overall missing. Only some civil society organizations explicitly link the issue of voting preferences for the radical right to neoliberal transformations of work and family and thus connect anti-racism to issues of social inequality and marginalization at the intersection of gender and race.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also Karner (2007), who analyzes the “counter-hegemonic regional press” in Austria.

  2. 2.

    The empirical work for this paper has been conducted in the context of two EU-funded projects, eEAV and RAGE. I thank Edma Ajanovic, who did the empirical study in the RAGE project, and Stefanie Mayer, who conducted research in the eEAV project, for their work.

  3. 3.

    Until 1971, homosexuality was criminalized in Austria.

  4. 4.

    The largest concentration camp on Austrian territory was located in the city of Mauthausen.

  5. 5.

    The MKÖ is the successor organization of the Austrian Concentration Camp Community Mauthausen, whose founders were camp survivors.

  6. 6.

    The DÖW was established in 1963 by former resistance fighters, concentration camp prisoners, persons returning from exile, and academics.

  7. 7.

    Founded in 1997.

  8. 8.

    We selected the most publicly visible and the most diverse civil society organizations. We did not take into account organizations such as Amnesty International, Caritas, the Austrian Red Cross, and Volkshilfe, which also help migrants and asylum seekers by providing mentorships or “integration buddy programs” and by raising awareness about discriminative issues in this field.

  9. 9.

    After WWII, right-wing dueling fraternities (Burschenschaften) gathered on 8 May at the Heldenplatz to remember the fallen Austrian Wehrmacht comrades and to grieve the end of the Nazi regime. Until 2013, only small (left-wing) groups demonstrated against this event, but since 2013, the Celebration of Joy has recoded this public space in the city center on 8 May to commemorate the liberation from National Socialism.

  10. 10.

    In March 2017, SOS Mitmensch launched the campaign “Populistenpause”, which called for a break in public and media reporting on the radical right.

  11. 11.

    It seems to be much easier for MiGaY to cooperate with political parties’ homosexual caucuses.

  12. 12.

    Another example of the mainstreaming of the radical right is that both ÖVP and SPÖ before the latest elections sounded out possible coalitions with the FPÖ.

References

  • BMI. (2013). Wahl 2013. http://wahl13.bmi.gv.at/

  • BMI. (2014). EU Wahl 2014. http://euwahl2014.bmi.gv.at/

  • Campani, G., & Sauer, B. (2017). Neo-fascist and neo-Nazi constellations: The cases of Italy and Austria. In G. Campani & G. Lazaridis (Eds.), Understanding the populist shift: Othering in a Europe in crisis. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, D., & Mattoni, A. (Eds.). (2014). Spreading protest: Social movements in times of crisis. Colchester: ECPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detant, A. (2005). The politics of anti-racism in Belgium: A qualitative analysis of the discourse of the anti-racist movement Hand in Hand in the 1990s. Ethnicities, 5, 183–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolezal, M., & Hutter, S. (2007). Konsensdemokratie unter Druck? Politischer Protest in Österreich, 1975–2005. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 36, 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flecker, J., & Kirschenhofer, S. (2007). Die populistische Lücke. Umbrüche in der Arbeitswelt und Aufstieg des Rechtspopulismus am Beispiel Österreichs. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foltin, R. (2004). Und wir bewegen uns doch. Soziale Bewegungen in Österreich. Wien: Edition Grundrisse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1988). The hard road to renewal: Thatcherism and the crisis of the left. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2000). Rassismus als ideologischer Diskurs. In N. Räthzel (Ed.), Theorien über Rassismus (pp. 7–16). Hamburg: Argument.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaney, M. T., & Rojas, F. (2014). Hybrid activism: Social movement mobilization in a multimovement environment. American Journal of Sociology, 119, 1047–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinisch, R. (2012). Demokratiekritik und (Rechts-)Populismus: Modellfall Österreich? In L. Helms & D. M. Wineroither (Eds.), Die österreichische Demokratie im Vergleich (pp. 361–382). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E., & Nielsen, G. M. (Eds.). (2008). Acts of citizenship. London: Zed books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karner, C. (2007). Austrian counter-hegemony. Critiquing ethnic exclusion and globalization. Ethnicities, 7, 82–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, K. (2014). Praxen politischer Intersektionalität. Eine qualitative Analyse der Zeitschriften und Veranstaltungen des Vereins MiGaY. Diploma thesis, University of Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, A. (2000). “Race”, racism and anti-racism: Challenging contemporary classifications. In social identities. Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 6, 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S. (2015). Politik der Differenzen. Ethnisierung, Rassismen und Antirassismus im weißen feministischen Aktivismus in Wien. PhD thesis, University of Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S., & Sauer, B. (2017). “Gender ideology” in Austria: Coalitions around an empty signifier. In R. Kuhar & D. Paternotte (Eds.), Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality (pp. 23–40). London/New York: Roman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S., Sori, I., & Sauer, B. (2016). Gendering “the people”: Heteronormativity and “ethno-masochism” in populist imaginary. In M. Raniera (Ed.), Populism, media and education: Challenging discrimination in contemporary digital societies (pp. 26–43). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M., & Winant, O. (2002). Racial formation. In P. Essed & D. T. Goldberg (Eds.), Race critical theories: Text and context (pp. 123–145). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelinka, A. (2002). Die FPÖ in der vergleichenden Parteienforschung. Zur typologischen Einordnung der Freiheitlichen Partei Österreichs. ÖZP, 31, 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penz, O. (2010). Vom Sozial- zum Wettbewerbsstaat. Arbeitsbeziehungen und politische Regulation in Österreich. In A. Grisold, W. Maderthaner, & O. Penz (Eds.), Neoliberalismus und die Krise des Sozialen. Das Beispiel Österreich (pp. 139–178). Böhlau: Vienna/Cologne/Weimar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poglia Mileti, F., Tondolo, R., Plomb, F., Schultheis, F., Meyer, M.-H., Hentges, G., Flecker, J., & Mairhuber, I. (2002). Modern sirens and their populist songs: A European literature review on changes in working life and the rise of right-wing populism (Literature review (Deliverable 1, SIREN)). Vienna: FORBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pühretmayer, H. (2002). Antirassismus als emanzipatorisches Projekt und die Probleme antirassistischer Praktiken in Wien. In M. Bojadzijev & A. Demirović (Eds.), Konjunkturen Des Rassismus (pp. 290–311). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pühretmayer, H., & Görg, A. (1999). Antirassismus in Österreich. Strategische Potenziale gegen Rassismus. Auszug aus unveröffentlichtem Forschungsbericht. http://no-racism.net/article

  • Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1994). Frame reflection toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, F. E., & Oikonomakis, L. (2014). They don’t represent us! The global resonance of the real democracy movement from the indignados to occupy. In D. della Porta & Y. A. Mattoni (Eds.), Spreading protest: Social movements in times of crisis (pp. 117–136). Colchester: ECPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzza, C. (2000). Anti-racism and EU institutions. Journal of European Integration, 22, 145–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, B., & Ajanovic, E. (2014). The rise of racism across Europe. In M. Sedmak, Z. Medaric, & S. Walker (Eds.), Children’s voices (pp. 17–32). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, B., & Ajanovic, E. (2016). Hegemonic discourses of difference and inequality: Right-wing organisations in Austria. In G. Lazaridis, G. Campani, & A. Benveniste (Eds.), The rise of the far right in Europe: Populist shifts and “othering” (pp. 81–108). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, S. (2008). Die Neuorganisation der Zuwanderung durch das Fremdenrechtspaket 2005. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/kmi/Bilder/kmi_WP12.pdf

  • Siim, B., & Mokre, M. (2013). European public spheres and intersectionality. In B. Siim & M. Mokre (Eds.), Negotiating gender and diversity in an emergent European public sphere (pp. 43–60). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Y. (2014). Discourse theory, post-hegemonic critique and Chantal Mouffe’s politics of passion. Parallax, 20, 118–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talos, E. (2006). Politik in Schwarz-Blau/Orange. Eine Bilanz. In E. Talos (Ed.), Schwarz-Blau. Eine Bilanz des ‘Neu-Regierens’ (pp. 326–343). Münster: Lit-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegel, G. (2013). Rechtsverschiebung in Europa. In P. Bathke & A. Hoffstadt (Eds.), Die neuen Rechten in Europa. Zwischen Neoliberalismus und Rassismus (pp. 112–125). PapyRossa: Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZARA. (2014). Rassismusreport. Vienna: ZARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbes, J. (2012). Österreich zuerst! http://www.univie.ac.at/unique/uniquecms/?p=1149

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sauer, B. (2019). The (Im)Possibility of Creating Counter-Hegemony Against the Radical Right: The Case of Austria. In: Siim, B., Krasteva, A., Saarinen, A. (eds) Citizens’ Activism and Solidarity Movements. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76183-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics