Skip to main content

Serious Relationships: Intersubjective Intermingling, Fuller Lives and Embodied Emotions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Making and Meaning of Relationships in Sri Lanka

Part of the book series: Culture, Mind, and Society ((CMAS))

  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter brings the threads the book highlighted together and proposes that, in the lives of my interlocutors, ‘serious relationships’ acquire the depth they claim as couple relationships mingling into my interlocutors’ lives. This mingling occurs through processes of intersubjective intermingling (a search for a ying for one’s yang), notions of fuller lives (where one actively pursues a life that is considered to be worthy lives or fuller lives, within which couple relationships and what it facilitates comprise a significant element) and embodying of emotions, through which the emotions that are felt emotions are embodied through habituation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The osariya is often cited as the traditional dress of the Kandyan Sinhalese woman. Six yards of cloth draped around the body with an elaborate frill at the side and a fall, the osariya is worn with a fitted blouse, known as a jacket.

  2. 2.

    Trawick’s rendition of parakkam reminded me of the Sinhala proverb: janmeṭa vaḍā purudda lokui, which my interlocutors used frequently, especially when they were critical of their peers’ or society’s moral failings. The literal translation of this proverb is that the impact one’s habit has in shaping one’s life is stronger than the impact the one’s birth circumstances may have on it, thus, favouring habit over birth.

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2010). Happy objects. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. L., & Landy, J. (2001). Philosophy as self-fashioning: Alexander Nehamas’s art of living. Diacritics, 31(1), 25–54. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1566314.

  • Butler, J. (2009). Violence, mourning and politics. In J. Harding & E. D. Pribram (Eds.), Emotions: A cultural studies reader (pp. 387–402). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsten, J. (1995). The substance of kinship and the heat of the hearth: Feeding, personhood, and relatedness among Malays in Pulau Langkawi. American Ethnologist, 22(2), 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsten, J. (2013). What kinship does—and how. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(2), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.2.013.

  • Hardt, M. (2011). For love or money. Cultural Anthropology, 26(4), 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01119.x.

  • Hughes, D. (2013). Violence, torture and memory in Sri Lanka: Life after terror. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosseleck, R. (2004). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehamas, A. (2000). The art of living: Socratic reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (2011a). What kinship is (Part one). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(1), 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (2011b). What kinship is (Part two). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(2), 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (2013). What kinship is—and is not. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, Monique. (2012). Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A Bourdieuian approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory, 51(2), 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2010). The value of relationships: Affective scenes and emotional performances. Feminist Legal Stidues, 18, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-010-9144-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L. (2009). The suicidal wound and fieldwork among Canadian Inuit. Being there: The fieldwork encounter and the making of truth (pp. 55–76). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trawick, M. (1992). Notes on love in a Tamil family. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw, H. (2006). All’s fair when love is war: Romantic passion and companionate marriage among the Huli of Papua New Guinea. In H. Wardlaw & J. S. Hirsch (Eds.), Modern loves: The anthropology of romantic courtship and companionate marriage (pp. 51–77). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihirini Sirisena .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sirisena, M. (2018). Serious Relationships: Intersubjective Intermingling, Fuller Lives and Embodied Emotions. In: The Making and Meaning of Relationships in Sri Lanka. Culture, Mind, and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76336-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics