Skip to main content

The Anthropocene: A Narrative in the Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environment and Society

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Environmental Sociology and Policy ((PASTESP))

Abstract

The narrative of the Anthropocene is shaping environmental debates as well as discussions within the environmental sciences. According to this narrative, humankind is facing its greatest challenge ever. This chapter discusses the current meanings of the concept of The Anthropocene in a critical but constructive manner. Approaching the Anthropocene as a multi-layered narrative, it discusses the promises and risks of adopting this concept and of making it central for understanding current global environmental challenges. We find that the narrative provides interesting scope for thinking sociologically about environmental challenges, but at the same time it involves some risks, which makes it important to reflect upon the conceptual usage of Anthropocene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The origin of the Anthropocene concept can be traced back to a conference organised the year 2000 by the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP). The session organizer focussed his contribution on the Holocene (the current geological epoch that began 12,000 years ago). Finally one of the participants, the chemist and Nobel laureate Paul Crutzen lost his patience, effectively announcing the end of this current era. As he later recalled: ‘I said we no longer live in the Holocene, but in the Anthropocene. After that, it suddenly went very quiet in the hall. In the coffee break the only issue discussed was the Anthropocene’ (Crutzen 2013, our translation).

  2. 2.

    Planetary boundaries was originally presented in an article in in Nature (Rockström et al. 2009), where nine planetary boundaries were presented with nine thresholds for various biophysical subsystems and processes. The article was updated, developed and revised in an article in Science 2015 (Steffen et al. 2015b).

References

  • Barnosky, A. D., Holmes, M., Kirchholtes, R., Lindsey, E., Maguire, K. C., Poust, A. W., Stegner, M. A., et al. (2014). Prelude to the Anthropocene: Two New North American Land Mammal Ages (NALMAs). The Anthropocene Review, 1(3), 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, J. (2015). Paradigm Dressed as Epoch: The Ideology of the Anthropocene. Environmental Values, 24(1), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F. (2014). The Anthropocene: A Governance Perspective. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, H. J. (2015). On the Possibilities of a Charming Anthropocene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2), 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2014). The Anthropocene and Geography III: Future Directions. Geography Compass, 8(7), 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. R., Jr., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-exuberant Sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(1), 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2014). Climate and Capital: On Conjoined Histories. Critical Inquiry, 41, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. R., & Balayannis, A. (2015). Co-producing (a fearful) Anthropocene. Geographical Research, 53(3), 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P. (2013, November 20). Es macht mir Angst, wie verletzlich die Atmosphäre ist. Ein Gesprächt mit dem Nobelpreisträger Paul J. Crutzen zum Anthropozän und den Chancen der Klimapolitik. Frankfurter Allgemeine, 20, page N2 (No. 270).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter No., 41, 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, J. A., Acma, B., Bub, S., Chambers, F. M., Chen, X., Cooper, J., Crok, D., et al. (2015). Social-Ecological Systems in the Anthropocene: The Need for Integrating Social and Biophysical Records at Regional Scales. Anthropocene Review, 2(3), 220–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Brulle, R. J. (Eds.). (2015). Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, M., de Richter, D., Waters, C., Haff, P., Neal, C., & Price, S. J. (2015). Diachronous Beginnings of the Anthropocene: The Lower Bounding Surface of Anthropogenic Deposits. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2011). A Feminist Project of Belonging for the Anthropocene. Gender, Place & Culture, 18(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bakker, P., Berkhout, F., de Boer, Y., Rockström, J., Ludwig, K., & Kok, M. (2015). Beyond Cockpit-ism: Four Insights to Enhance the Transformative Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 7(2), 1651–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C., & Grinevald, J. (2015). Was the Anthropocene Anticipated? The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan, J. A. (2014). Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, K. A., Crutzen, P. J., Lambin, E. F., Liverman, D., Mantua, N. J., McNeill, J. R., Messerli, B., & Steffen, W. (2007). Decadal Interactions of Humans and the Environment. In R. Costanza, L. Graumlich, & W. L. Steffen (Eds.), Sustainability or Collapse? An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth (pp. 341–375). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2014). Can Science fix Climate Change? A Case Against Climate Engineering. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSC. (2013). World Social Science Report 2013: Changing Global Environments. Paris: UNESCO and ISSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2012). Imagine and Imagination: The Formation of Global Environmental Consciousness. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), Science and Public Reason (pp. 78–102). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E., Morehouse, H., Dalby, S., Lehman, J., Nelson, S., Rowan, R., Wakefield, S., & Yusuff, K. (2014). After the Anthropocene: Politics and Geographic Inquiry for a New Epoch. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2015). Anthropocene Futures: People, Resources and Sustainability. The Anthropocene Review, 2(2), 152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog, R., & Waterton, C. (2016). Anthropocene–A Cautious Welcome from Environmental Sociology? Environmental Sociology, 2(4), 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog, R., Soneryd, L., & Uggla, Y. (2010). Transboundary Risk Governance. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog, R., Mol, A., & Oosterveer, P. (2015). Towards a Global Environmental Sociology? Legacies, Trend and Future Directions. Current Sociology, 63(3), 339–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S., Sonnenfeld, D., & Fisher, D. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, J. (2014). Multinatural Geographies for the Anthropocene. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 593–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., & Vasileidou, E. (2015). Who Speaks for the Future of Earth? How Critical Social Science Can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 32, 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynas, M. (2011). The God Species. Saving the Planet in the Age of Humans. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. (2014). The Geology of Mankind? A Critique of the Anthropocene Narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möllers, N. (2014). Conceptualising the Exhibition. In N. Möllers, C. Schwägerl, & H. Trischler (Eds.), Welcome to the Anthropocene: The Earth in Our Hands (pp. 122–123). Munich: Deutsches Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. W. (Ed.). (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, CA: PM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimanis, A., Åsberg, C., & Hedrén, J. (2015). Four Problems, Four Directions for Environmental Humanities: Toward Critical Posthumanities for the Anthropocene. Ethics & the Environment, 20(1), 67–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, F., Barnosky, T., Dearing, J., Fischer-Kowalski, M., McNeill, J., Steffen, W., & Zalasiewicz, J. (2014). The Anthropocene Review: Its Significance, Implications and the Rationale for a New Transdisciplinary Journal. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, N. (2013). Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palsson, G., Szerszynski, B., Sörlin, S., Marks, J., Avril, B., Crumley, C., Hackmann, H., et al. (2013). Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the Social Sciences and Humanities in Global Environmental Change Research. Environmental Science and Policy, 28, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raworth, K. (2012). A Safe and Just Space for Humanity. Can We Live Within the Doughnut? Oxfam Policy and Practice: Climate Change and Resilience, 8(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, L., Avango, D., Keogh, L., Möllers, N., Scherer, B., & Trischler, H. (2014). Three Galleries of the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review, 1(3), 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., et al. (2009). A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. J., Brown, P. G., & Orr, C. J. (2016). Ethics in the Anthropocene: A Research Agenda. The Anthropocene Review, 3(3), 188–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwägerl, C. (2014). We Aren’t Doomed. An Interview with Paul J. Crutzen. In N. Möllers, C. Schwägerl, & H. Trischler (Eds.), Welcome to the Anthropocene: The Earth in Our Hands (pp. 30–36). Munich: Deutsches Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., & Spurling, N. (Eds.). (2013). Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature? Ambio, 36(8), 614–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011a). The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369(1938), 842–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, A., Persson, Å., Deutch, L., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., Crumley, C., et al. (2011b). The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship. Ambio, 40(7), 739–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015a). The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., et al. (2015b). Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. S. (2001). On Telling Regulatory Tales: rBST Comes to Canada. Social Studies of Science, 31(4), 475–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., Zalasiewicz, J., Haff, P. K., Schwägerl, C., Barnosky, A. D., & Ellis, E. C. (2015). The Anthropocene Biosphere. The Anthropocene Review, 2(3), 196–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W., & Crutzen, P. (2010). The New World of the Anthropocene. Environment, Science & Technology, 44(7), 2228–2231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Waters, C. N., Barnosky, A. D., & Haff, P. (2014). The Technofossil Record of Humans. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Lidskog .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lidskog, R., Waterton, C. (2018). The Anthropocene: A Narrative in the Making. In: Boström, M., Davidson, D. (eds) Environment and Society. Palgrave Studies in Environmental Sociology and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76415-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76415-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76414-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76415-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics