Skip to main content

Lean In and Tell Me a (True) Story: Sheryl Sandberg’s Revision of Feminist History

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women Activists and Civil Rights Leaders in Auto/Biographical Literature and Films

Abstract

The slogan “the personal is the political” communicates the central place that personal experience has in US feminism; the life stories of women—in conventional biographical and autobiographical books, in film biographies, in talk show formats, documentaries, and, now, in social media—also have a prominent place in US popular culture. These stories are subject to the organizing codes of interpretive communities that must be able to locate the story within an identifiable frame of meaning. This chapter examines Sheryl Sandberg’s multimedia memoir and social movement Lean In as a memoir/manifesto that attempts to reframe feminism in service of the corporation, erasing feminism as a collective political movement and marginalizing working-class women’s stories of gendered oppression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Portions of the following have been previously printed in my book Historicizing Post-Discourses: Postracialism and Postfeminism in U. S. Culture.

  2. 2.

    In 1989 the U.S. Supreme Court, in Webster v Reproductive Health Services, upheld states’ rights to regulate women’s right to abortion. In 1991 the Senate held televised hearings on Anita Hill’s sexual harassment allegations against Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas. In 1996, against strong feminist opposition Clinton passed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. These national controversies occurred simultaneously with the first uses of the term “third wave” to describe the emergence of a new generation of feminists. For a critical examination of this generational model of feminist history , see Third Wave Feminism : A Critical Exploration.

  3. 3.

    bell hooks makes a similar point about Sandberg’s appropriation of feminism , calling it “faux feminism .” There are, in fact, many feminist critiques of Sandberg, including Faludi’s excellent essay discussed here.

  4. 4.

    It is in an interview with Ken Auletta that Sandberg is most explicit about her rejection of affirmative action, although it is implied in many passages of the book.

  5. 5.

    Thank you to Unite Here Local 26 and Emma Perdomo for the use of this image.

Works Cited

  • Auletta, Ken. “A Woman’s Place.” New Yorker, July 11, 2011. www.newyorker.com. Accessed on March 11, 2016.

  • Baxandall, Rosalyn. “Historical Life Stories.” Feminist Studies, vol. 34, no. 3 (2008): 412–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couser, G. Thomas. “Genre Matters: Form, Force, and Filiation.” Life Writing, vol. 2, no. 2 (2005): 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, Susan. Backlash: The Undeclared War against American Women. New York: Crown Publishers, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, Susan. “Facebook Feminism, Like It or Not.” The Baffler, n.p., 2013. Accessed on March 14, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, Stacy, Gillian Howe, and Rebecca Munford. Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, Mary. “Feminists Versus Feminization.” In Michaele L. Ferguson and Lori Jo Marso (eds.), W Stands for Women: How the George W. Bush Presidency Shaped a New Politics of Gender. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007, 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. “Dig Deep: Beyond Lean In.” The Feminist Wire, October 28, 2013. Accessed on March 12, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Katie. “Workers Trying to Unionize Appeal to Sheryl Sandberg.” Boston Globe, May 24, 2014. bostonglobe.com. Accessed on January 20, 2016.

  • Kennedy, Tanya Ann. Historicizing Post-discourses: Postfeminism and Postracialism in United States Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, David. The Facebook Effect: The Inside Story of the Company That Is Connecting the World. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lean In. LeanIn.Org, n.d. Web. December 30, 2014. http://leanin.org/.

  • Ledbetter, Lilly M. and Lanier Scott Isom. Grace and Grit: My Fight for Equal Pay and Fairness at Goodyear and Beyond. New York: Crown Archetype, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, Philippe. On Autobiography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losse, Kate. “Feminism’s Tipping Point: Who Wins from Leaning In?” Dissent Magazine, March 26, 2013. Accessed on March 14, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marichal, José. Facebook Democracy: The Architecture of Disclosure and the Threat to Public Life. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, Laurie. “There is No “I” in Network: Social Networking Sites and Posthuman Auto/Biography.” Biography, vol. 35, no. 1 (Winter 2012): 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Daniel. “The Paradox of User Control.” Design Philosophy Papers, vol. 1, no. 3 (2003): 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkins, Wendy. “Bad Girls, Bad Reputations: Feminist Ethics and Postfeminism.” Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 30 (1999): 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Martin. “The Fashion Police: Governing the Self in What Not to Wear.” In Yvonne Tasker and Diane Negra (eds.), Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007, 227–248.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nikolas. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. New York and London: Routledge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, Sheryl. Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York: Knopf, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Sidonie and Julia Watson. Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narratives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snitow, Ann. “Refugees from Utopia: Remembering, Forgetting, and the Making of The Feminist Memoir Project.” In Yifat Gutman, Adam D. Brown, and Amy Sodaro (eds.), Memory and the Future: Transnational Politics, Ethics, and Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, 141–157.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J. “‘You Have One Identity’: Performing the Self on Facebook and LinkedIn.” Media, Culture & Society, vol. 35, no. 2 (2013): 199–215. Accessed on February 7, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Rebecca. “Becoming the Third Wave.” Ms. 39 (January 1992): 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerberg, Mark. “Timeline Launch.” Facebook, 2011. Accessed on January 20, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanya Ann Kennedy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kennedy, T.A. (2018). Lean In and Tell Me a (True) Story: Sheryl Sandberg’s Revision of Feminist History. In: Letort, D., Lebdai, B. (eds) Women Activists and Civil Rights Leaders in Auto/Biographical Literature and Films. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77081-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics