Abstract
Fitness trackers are an increasingly popular tool for tracking one’s health and physical activity. While research has evaluated the potential benefits of these devices for health and well-being, few studies have empirically evaluated users’ behaviors when sharing personal fitness information (PFI) and the privacy concerns that stem from the collection, aggregation, and sharing of PFI. In this study, we present findings from a survey of Fitbit and Jawbone users (N = 361) to understand how concerns about privacy in general and user-generated data in particular affect users’ mental models of PFI privacy, tracking, and sharing. Findings highlight the complex relationship between users’ demographics, sharing behaviors, privacy concerns, and internet skills with how valuable and sensitive they rate their PFI. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities to increase user awareness of privacy and PFI.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acquisti, A., Gross, R.: Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In: Danezis, G., Golle, P. (eds.) PET 2006. LNCS, vol. 4258, pp. 36–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11957454_3
Ball, K., Di Domenico, M.L., Nunan, D.: Big data surveillance and the body-subject. Body Soc. 22(2), 58–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15624973
Barnes, S.D.: A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 11(9) (2006)
Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15(5), 662–679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Boyd, D., Hargittai, E.: Facebook privacy settings: who cares? First Monday 15(8) (2010)
Christovich, M.: Why should we care what Fitbit shares: a proposed statutory solution to protect sensitive personal fitness information. Hastings Commun./Entertain. Law J. 38, 91–116 (2016)
Clawson, J., et al.: No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on Craigslist. In: Proceedings of UbiComp 2015, pp. 647–658. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807554
Crawford, K., Lingel, J., Karppi, T.: Our metrics, ourselves: a hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. Euro. J. Cult. Stud. 18(4–5), 479–496 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415584857
De Mooy, M., Yuen, S.: Toward privacy aware research and development in wearable health. Center for Democracy and Technology, Washington (2016)
Earp, J.B., Anton, A.I., Aiman-Smith, L., Stufflebeam, W.H.: Examining internet privacy policies within the context of user privacy values. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 52(2), 227–237 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.844927
European Union: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. Off. J. Eur. Union 119, 1–88 (2016)
Fitbit: Fitbit Privacy Policy (2016). http://www.fitbit.com/legal/privacy-policy
Fox, S., Duggan, M.: Tracking for Health. Pew Research Center, Washington (2013)
Fritz, T., Huang, E.M., Murphy, G.C., Zimmermann, T.: Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014, pp. 487–496. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557383
Gorm, N., Shklovski, I.: Sharing steps in the workplace: changing privacy concerns over time. In: Proceedings of CHI 2016, pp. 4315–4319. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858352
Gorm, N., Shklovski, I.: Steps, choices and moral accounting: observations from a step-counting campaign in the workplace. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2016, pp. 148–159. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819944
Hargittai, E., Hsieh, Y.P.: Succinct survey measures of web-use skills. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 30(1), 95–107 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310397146
Hargittai, E., Marwick, A.: “What can I really do?” Explaining the privacy paradox with online apathy. Int. J. Commun. 10, 3737–3757 (2016)
Ho, J.-J., Novick, S., Yeung, C.: A snapshot of data sharing by select health and fitness apps. Federal Trade Commission, Washington (2014)
Jawbone: Jawbone UP Privacy Policy (2014). https://jawbone.com/up/privacy
Klasnja, P., Consolvo, S., Choudhury, T., Beckwith, R., Hightower, J.: Exploring privacy concerns about personal sensing. In: Tokuda, H., Beigl, M., Friday, A., Brush, A.J.B., Tobe, Y. (eds.) Pervasive 2009. LNCS, vol. 5538, pp. 176–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_13
Kumar, P.: Privacy policies and their lack of clear disclosure regarding the life cycle of user information. In: FS-16–04, pp. 249–256. AAAI, Palo Alto (2016)
Lupton, D.: The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Polity, Cambridge (2016)
McDonald, A.M., Cranor, L.F.: The cost of reading privacy policies. ISJLP 4, 543–568 (2008)
Motti, V.G., Caine, K.: Users’ privacy concerns about wearables: impact of form factor, sensors and type of data collected. In: Brenner, M., Christin, N., Johnson, B., Rohloff, K. (eds.) FC 2015. LNCS, vol. 8976, pp. 231–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48051-9_17
Patterson, H.: Contextual expectations of privacy in self-generated health information flows. In: TPRC 41, pp. 1–48. SSRN, Rochester (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2242144
Peppet, S.R.: Regulating the internet of things: first steps toward managing discrimination, privacy, security and consent. Tex. Law Rev. 93, 85–178 (2014)
Raij, A., Ghosh, A., Kumar, S., Srivastava, M.: Privacy risks emerging from the adoption of innocuous wearable sensors in the mobile environment. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 11–20. ACM, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978945
Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., Chalmers, M.: Personal tracking as lived informatics. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014, pp. 1163–1172. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039
Shirer, M., Llamas, R., Ubrani, J.: IDC Forecasts Wearables Shipments to Reach 213.6 Million Units Worldwide in 2020. IDC (2016)
Taddicken, M.: The “privacy paradox” in the social web. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19, 248–273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12052
Vitak, J.: A digital path to happiness? In: Reinecke, L., Oliver, M.B. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Media Use and Well-Being, pp. 274–287. Routledge, New York (2016)
Xu, H., Gupta, S., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Measuring mobile users’ concerns for information privacy. In: Proceedings of ICIS 2012, pp. 1–16. AIS, Atlanta (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vitak, J., Liao, Y., Kumar, P., Zimmer, M., Kritikos, K. (2018). Privacy Attitudes and Data Valuation Among Fitness Tracker Users. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds) Transforming Digital Worlds. iConference 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10766. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78104-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78105-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)