Skip to main content

What Makes It Persuasive?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10809))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Based on an analysis of two wearable activity trackers, this papers seeks to contribute to the discussion of characteristics of persuasive design, by arguing that although principles commonly applied in persuasive technologies are present, it may not justify that a technology is defined as persuasive. We refer to the rhetorical concept of peithenanke, in order to explain the subtle nuances of different types of behaviour design, and support previously made arguments that transparency and ethics are fundamental qualities of persuasion, which should not be overlooked neither in theory nor in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://buy.garmin.com/da-DK/DK/cIntoSports-c571-p1.html.

References

  1. Hogan, M.J.: Persuasion in the rhetorical tradition. In: Dillard, J.P., Shen, L. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, pp. 2–20. Beverly Hills, SAGE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fogg, B.: Persuasive Technology, Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 164–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Understanding persuasive software functionality in practice: a field trial of polar FT60. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. ACM, Claremont, California (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 28 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glasemann, M., Kanstrup, A.M., Ryberg, T.: Making chocolate-covered broccoli: designing a mobile learning game about food for young people with diabetes. In: DIS 2010 Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Billig, M.: Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walbank, F.W., et al.: The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Fafner, J.: Retorikkens Brændpunkt. Rhetorica Scandinavia, vol. 2 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Atkinson, B.M.C.: Captology: a critical review. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Berdichevsky, D., Neuenschwander, E.: Towards an ethics of persuasive technology. Commun. ACM 43, 51–58 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Spahn, A.: And lead us (not) into persuasion…? Persuasive technology and the ethics of Communication. Sci. Eng. Ethics 18(4), 633–650 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: Acttention – influencing communities of practice with persuasive learning designs. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 184–195. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Meschtscherjakov, A., Trösterer, S., Lupp, A., Tscheligi, M.: Pokémon WALK: persuasive effects of Pokémon go game-design elements. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 241–252. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Burri Gram-Hansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gram-Hansen, S.B., Rabjerg, M.F., Hovedskou, E.K.B. (2018). What Makes It Persuasive?. In: Ham, J., Karapanos, E., Morita, P., Burns, C. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10809. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78977-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78978-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics