Skip to main content

N-Gram Based Approach for Automatic Prediction of Essay Rubric Marks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10832))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automatic Essay Scoring, applied to the prediction of grades for dimensions of a scoring rubric, can provide automatic detailed feedback on students’ written assignments. We apply a character and word n-gram based technique proposed originally for authorship identification—Common N-Gram (CNG) classifier—to this task. We report promising results for the rubric mark prediction for essays by CNG, and perform analysis of suitability of different types of n-grams for the task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.kaggle.com/c/asap-aes.

  2. 2.

    A correction for multiple hypothesis testing was not applied; it would be valuable if outperforming performance of any classifier was to be established.

References

  1. Shermis, M.D., Burstein, J.: Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation: Current Applications and New Directions. Routledge, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Phandi, P., Chai, K.M.A., Ng, H.T.: Flexible domain adaptation for automated essay scoring using correlated linear regression. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 431–439 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kešelj, V., Peng, F., Cercone, N., Thomas, C.: N-gram-based author profiles for authorship attribution. In: Proceedings of the Conference Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics, PACLING 2003, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, pp. 255–264, August 2003

    Google Scholar 

  4. Attali, Y., Burstein, J.: Automated essay scoring with e-rater® v. 2.0. ETS Res. Rep. Ser. 2004(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, A., Karayev, S., Gutowski, K., Abbeel, P.: Gradescope: a fast, flexible, and fair system for scalable assessment of handwritten work. In: Proceedings of the Fourth 2017 ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 81–88. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foltz, P.W., Laham, D., Landauer, T.K.: Automated essay scoring: applications to educational technology. In: EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, pp. 939–944. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Juola, P.: Authorship attribution. Found. Trends Inf. Retriev. 1(3), 233–334 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jankowska, M., Milios, E., Kešelj, V.: Author verification using common n-gram profiles of text documents. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 387–397. Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics, August 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doyle, J.: Automatic evaluation of student essays using n-gram analysis techniques. Master’s thesis, Dalhousie University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stamatatos, E.: Author identification using imbalanced and limited training texts. In: Proceeding of the 18th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, DEXA 2007, Regensburg, Germany, pp. 237–241, September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Bird, S., Loper, E., Klein, E.: Natural Language Processing with Python. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemaître, G., Nogueira, F., Aridas, C.K.: Imbalanced-learn: a Python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(17), 1–5 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The project was supported by the NSERC Engage grant EGP/507291-2016 with industry partner, D2L Corporation. The authors would like to thank D2L members: Brian Cepuran, VP, D2L Labs and Rose Kocher, Director, Grant & Research Programs, for their guidance in the project and the feedback on the paper. The authors would also like to acknowledge a support from Killam Predoctoral Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Jankowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jankowska, M., Conrad, C., Harris, J., Kešelj, V. (2018). N-Gram Based Approach for Automatic Prediction of Essay Rubric Marks. In: Bagheri, E., Cheung, J. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10832. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89656-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89656-4_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89655-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89656-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics