Skip to main content

Class-Specific Reducts vs. Classic Reducts in a Rule-Based Classifier: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Recognition (MCPR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 10880))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In Rough Set Theory, reducts are minimal subsets of attributes that retain the ability of the whole set of attributes to discern objects belonging to different classes. On the other hand, class-specific reducts allow discerning objects belonging to a specific class from all other classes. This latest type of reduct has been little studied. Here we show, through a case study, some advantages of using class-specific reducts instead of classic ones in a rule-based classifier. Our results show that it is worthwhile to deepen in the study of this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bache, K., Lichman, M.: UCI machine learning repository. School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA (2013). http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  2. Baggenstoss, P.M.: Class-specific feature sets in classification. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 47, 3428–3432 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barman, T., Rajesh, G., Archana, R.: Rough set based segmentation and classification model for ECG. In: Conference on Advances in Signal Processing (CASP), pp. 18–23. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, W.W.: Fast effective rule induction. In: Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference, Lake Tahoe California, USA, pp. 1–10 (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, W.W., Singer, Y.: A simple, fast, and effective rule learner. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Orlando Florida, USA, pp. 335–342 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, C., Yao, Y.: An addition strategy for reduct construction. In: Miao, D., Pedrycz, W., Ślȩzak, D., Peters, G., Hu, Q., Wang, R. (eds.) RSKT 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8818, pp. 535–546. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11740-9_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Jia, X.Y., Shang, L., Zhou, B., Yao, Y.Y.: Generalized attribute reduct in rough set theory Knowl. Based Syst. 91, 204–218 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang, J.Y., Wang, F., Dang, C.Y., Qian, Y.H.: A group incremental approach to feature selection applying rough set technique. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26, 294–308 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miao, D.Q., Zhao, Y., Yao, Y.Y., Li, H.X., Xu, F.F.: Reducts in consistent and inconsistent decision tables of the Pawlak rough set model. Inf. Sci. 179(24), 4140–4150 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets, Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data, pp. 315–330. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pineda-Bautista, B.B., Carrasco-Ochoa, J.A., Martínez-Trinidad, J.F.: General framework for class-specific feature selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 10018–10024 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quinlan, J.R.: MDL and categorical theories (continued). In: Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference, Lake Tahoe California, USA, pp. 464–470 (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Rana, H., Lal, M.: A rough set theory approach for rule generation and validation using RSES. Int. J. Rough Sets Data Anal. 3(1), 55–70 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rana, H., Lal, M.: A comparative study based on rough set and classification via clustering approaches to handle incomplete data to predict learning styles. Int. J. Decis. Supp. Syst. Technol. 9(2), 1–20 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Skowron, A., Bazan, J., Szczuka, M., Wroblewski, J.: Rough set exploration system (version 2.2.2). http://logic.mimuw.edu.pl/~rses/

  17. Triguero, I., Gonzlez, S., Moyano, J.M., Garca, S., Alcal-Fdez, J., Luengo, J., Fernndez, A., del Jesus, M.J., Snchez, L., Herrera, F.: KEEL 3.0: an open source software for multi-stage analysis in data mining. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 10, 1238–1249 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, G.Y., Ma, X.A., Yu, H.: Monotonic uncertainty measures for attribute reduction in probabilistic rough set model. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 59, 41–67 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, L.P., Wang, Y.L., Chang, Q.: Feature selection methods for big data bioinformatics: a survey from the search perspective. Methods 111, 21–31 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yao, Y., Fu, R.: The concept of reducts in Pawlak three-step rough set analysis. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Ramanna, S., Suraj, Z., Wang, X. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets XVI. LNCS, vol. 7736, pp. 53–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36505-8_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao, Y.Y., Zhang, X.: Class-specific attribute reducts in rough set theory. Inf. Sci. 418(419), 601–618 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, X.Y., Miao, D.Q.: Double-quantitative fusion of accuracy and importance: systematic measure mining, benign integration construction, hierarchical attribute reduction. Knowl. Based Syst. 91, 219–240 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, M.L., Wu, L.: LIFT: multi-label learning with label-specific features. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37, 107–120 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel S. Lazo-Cortés .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lazo-Cortés, M.S., Martínez-Trinidad, J.F., Carrasco-Ochoa, J.A. (2018). Class-Specific Reducts vs. Classic Reducts in a Rule-Based Classifier: A Case Study. In: Martínez-Trinidad, J., Carrasco-Ochoa, J., Olvera-López, J., Sarkar, S. (eds) Pattern Recognition. MCPR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10880. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92198-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92198-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92197-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92198-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics