Skip to main content

Meta-considerations for Planning, Introducing and Standardising Inter and Transdisciplinary Learning in Higher Degree Institutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education

Abstract

Tertiary institutions across Australia and internationally are increasingly moving toward implementing innovative frameworks for teaching and learning to facilitate cross-disciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary forms of education. Such programmes are characterized by learning and research that transgresses disciplinary boundaries, and supports collaborative research and practice to generate novel approaches to complex problems. In creating programmes that cross faculties, disciplines and epistemological perspectives, both challenges and opportunities undoubtedly arise. This chapter investigates the range of perceived and actual barriers to implementing interdisciplinary postgraduate programmes at an institutional level at the University of Technology Sydney. Over a 12-month research project, 25 interviews with faculty deans, senior executives, and teaching and learning and operations staff across the university were conducted, highlighting cultural, institutional, governance, planning and marketing issues that needed to be overcome for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary postgraduate programmes to be successful in the long term. We sought to ensure the validity of the research findings by holding a half-day workshop Validity of the research findings were sought through a half-day workshop with senior faculty and operations staff to collaboratively identify major barriers and mitigation strategies for the success of interdisciplinary programmes in the future. This chapter, therefore, is not only an illustrative example of the challenges faced by programmes aiming to reform collaborative education; it also provides insight into the process of collaboratively developing recommendations for how new programmes might support cultural change, successful planning, governance and the operationalization of programmes that transgress disciplinary and faculty structures for the improvement of teaching and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Augsburg, T. (2014). Becoming transdisciplinary: The emergence of the transdisciplinary individual. World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 70(3–4), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2012). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrick, E. G., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., & Roberts, M. R. (Eds.). (2011). Facilitating interdisciplinary research and education: A practical guide. Workshop report from science on FIRE: Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research and Education, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fam, D. M., Smith, T., & Cordell, D. (2017). Being a transdisciplinary researcher: Skills and dispositions fostering competence in transdisciplinary research and practice. In D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Riedy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability outcomes (pp. 77–92). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assesses: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, C. (2009). Integrating the disciplines: Successful interdisciplinary subjects. Report for The Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart Research Associates. (2015). Falling short? College learning and career success: Selected findings from online surveys of employers and college students conducted on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities. Report prepared for the Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartesveldt, C. V., & Giordan, J. (2008). Impact of transformative interdisciplinary research and graduate education on academic institutions. Workshop Report, National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, S. (2005). Disciplinary hegemony meets interdisciplinary ascendancy: Can interdisciplinary/integrative studies survive, and if so, how? Issues in Integrative Studies, 12, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, K. A. (2009). Special issue: Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 1–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A., Healey, M., & Zetter, R. (2008). Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. Available at: http://www.edshare.soton.ac.uk/349/1/LinkingTeachingAndResearch_April07.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2017.

  • Jiang, F., & Roberts, P. (2011). An investigation of the impact of research-led education on student learning. Technical report. Available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1161&context=jutlp. Accessed 17 June 2017.

  • Klein, J. T. (2010). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures: A model for strength and sustainability. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2017). Transdisciplinarity and sustainability: Patterns of definition. In D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Riedy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability outcomes. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2018). Learning and transdisciplinary collaboration: A conceptual vocabulary. In D. Fam, L. Neuhauser, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), The art of collaborative research and collective learning: Transdisciplinary research, practice and education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., & Newell, W. (1998). Advancing interdisciplinary studies. In W. Newell (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the literature. New York: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, C. M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, F., III, & Redman, C. L. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., Sharp, J., & Strong, J. (2012). What is research-led teaching? Multi-disciplinary perspectives REST/GuildHE. Available at: http://collections.crest.ac.uk/5215/. Accessed 17 June 2017.

  • Minnich, E. (1995). Liberal learning and the arts of connection for the new academy. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G., Townsley, O., & Price, A. (2016). The challenge-driven university: How real-life problems can fuel learning. Draft report, National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (UK) (NESTA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. G., & Shoenberg, R. (1998). Contemporary understandings of liberal education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress, B., Tress, G., & Fry, G. (2005). Defining concepts and the process of knowledge production in integrative research. In B. Tress, G. Tress, G. Fry, & P. Opdam (Eds.), From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application. Dordrecht: Wageningen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dena Fam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fam, D., Leimbach, T., Kelly, S., Hitchens, L., Callen, M. (2018). Meta-considerations for Planning, Introducing and Standardising Inter and Transdisciplinary Learning in Higher Degree Institutions. In: Fam, D., Neuhauser, L., Gibbs, P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93742-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93743-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics