Skip to main content

The Influence of Gender, Personality, Cognitive and Affective Student Engagement on Academic Engagement in Educational Virtual Worlds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10947))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Educational virtual worlds (EVWs) are emerging as immersive learning environments that allow students to engage in experiential learning. However, understanding whether individual student differences influence learning behaviours and adapting the EVW accordingly has not been extensively investigated. This paper reports an experimental study with 115 undergraduate students to explore the link between their gender, personality, cognitive and affective engagement in relation to their academic engagement, measured by a quiz after using the world. We also explore whether providing hints can improve their academic engagement in the EVW. Only personal support (a factor of affective engagement) and intrinsic motivation (a factor of cognitive engagement) were found to be related to the quiz score. Also the personality dimension of Openness indicated student propensity to accept support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Richards, D., Taylor, M.: A comparison of learning gains when using a 2D simulation tool versus a 3D virtual world: an experiment to find the right representation involving the marginal value theorem. Comput. Educ. 86, 157–171 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rickel, J.: Intelligent virtual agents for education and training: opportunities and challenges. In: de Antonio, A., Aylett, R., Ballin, D. (eds.) IVA 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2190, pp. 15–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44812-8_2

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, S.C., Wentz, R.K., Woods, M.M.: Using virtual worlds in education: Second Life® as an educational tool. Teach. Psychol. 36(1), 59–64 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eschenbrenner, B., Nah, F.F.-H., Siau, K.: 3-D virtual worlds in education: applications, benefits, issues, and opportunities. J. Database Manag. (JDM) 19(4), 91–110 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Falloon, G.: Using avatars and virtual environments in learning: What do they have to offer? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41(1), 108–122 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carini, R.M., Kuh, G.D., Klein, S.P.: Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages. Res. High. Educ. 47(1), 1–32 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eyong, E.I., David, B.E., Umoh, A.J.: The influence of personality trait on the academic performance of secondary school students in Cross River State. Nigeria. IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 19(3), 12–19 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fosse, T.H., et al.: The impact of personality and self-efficacy on academic and military performance: the mediating role of self-efficacy. J. Mil. Stud. 6(1), 47–65 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Furnham, A., Monsen, J.: Personality traits and intelligence predict academic school grades. Learn. Individ. Differ. 19(1), 28–33 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg, L.R.: An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59(6), 1216 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.: A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J. Res. Pers. 37(6), 504–528 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McCrae, R.R., Costa Jr., P.T.: A five-factor theory of personality. In: Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, vol. 2, pp. 139–153 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A.: Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Pers. Individ. Differ. 44(7), 1596–1603 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hazrati-Viari, A., Rad, A.T., Torabi, S.S.: The effect of personality traits on academic performance: The mediating role of academic motivation. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 32, 367–371 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(1), 59–109 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Appleton, J.J., et al.: Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. J. Sch. Psychol. 44(5), 427–445 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hassaskhah, J., Khanzadeh, A.A., Mohamad Zade, S.: The relationship between internal forms of engagement (cognitive-affective) and academic success across years of study. Issues Lang. Teach. 1(2), 251–272 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoff, J., Lopus, J.S.: Does student engagement affect student achievement in high school economics classes. In: The Annual Meetings of the Allied Social Science Association, Philadelphia, PA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ewell, P., An analysis of relationships between NSSE and selected student learning outcomes measures for seniors attending public institutions in South Dakota. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, Boulder, CO (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. de Haan, J., Richards, D.: Navigation Paths and Performance in Educational Virtual Worlds. Navigation (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. de Haan, J., Richards, D., Dignum, F.: Aiding learning efficiency in virtual worlds. In: Virtual Systems and Multimedia, 26–30 October 2018, Dublin, Ireland (2017, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carter, E.W., Cushing, L.S., Kennedy, C.H.: Peer support strategies for improving all students’ social lives and learning. Educ. Rev. Reseñas Educativas (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kapur, M.: Productive failure. Cognit. Instr. 26(3), 379–424 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. VanLehn, K., et al.: Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognit. Instr. 21(3), 209–249 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weisberg, Y.J., DeYoung, C.G., Hirsh, J.B.: Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Front. Psychol. 2, 178 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the participants in our study. Also, we thank Meredith Taylor for her assistance with Omosa. This work has in part been supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP150102144.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Richards .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Makhija, A., Richards, D., de Haan, J., Dignum, F., Jacobson, M.J. (2018). The Influence of Gender, Personality, Cognitive and Affective Student Engagement on Academic Engagement in Educational Virtual Worlds. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10947. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93842-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93843-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics