Abstract
A key feature of most computer-based games is agency: the capability for students to make their own decisions in how they play. Agency is assumed to lead to engagement and fun, but may or may not be helpful to learning. While the best learners are often good self-regulated learners, many students are not, only benefiting from instructional choices made for them. In the study presented in this paper, involving a total of 158 fifth and sixth grade students, children played a mathematics learning game called Decimal Point, which helps middle-school students learn decimals. One group of students (79) played and learned with a low-agency version of the game, in which they were guided to play all “mini-games” in a prescribed sequence. The other group of students (79) played and learned with a high-agency version of the game, in which they could choose how many and in what order they would play the mini-games. The results show there were no significant differences in learning or enjoyment across the low and high-agency conditions. A key reason for this may be that students across conditions did not substantially vary in the way they played, perhaps due to the indirect control features present in the game. It may also be the case that the young students who participated in this study did not exercise their agency or self-regulated learning. This work is relevant to the AIED community, as it explores how game-based learning can be adapted. In general, once we know which game and learning features lead to the best learning outcomes, as well as the circumstances that maximize those outcomes, we can better design AI-powered, adaptive games for learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barab, S.A., Scott, B., Siyahhan, S., Goldstone, R., Ingram-Goble, A., Zuiker, S.J., Warren, S.: Transformational play as a curricular scaffold: using videogames to support science education. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18(4), 305 (2009)
Clark, D.B., Tanner-Smith, E.E., Killingsworth, S.S.: Digital games, design, and learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 86(1), 79–122 (2016)
Cordova, D.I., Lepper, M.R.: Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. J. Educ. Psychol. 88(4), 715 (1996)
Crocco, F., Offenholley, K., Hernandez, C.: A proof-of-concept study of game-based learning in higher education. Simul. Gam. 47(4), 403–422 (2016)
Damerau, F.J.: A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Commun. ACM 7(3), 171–176 (1964)
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 9–15. ACM (2011)
Flowerday, T., Shell, D.F.: Disentangling the effects of interest and choice on learning, engagement, and attitude. Learn. Ind. Differ. 40, 134–140 (2015)
Forlizzi, J., McLaren, B.M., Ganoe, C., McLaren, P.B., Kihumba, G., Lister, K.: Decimal point: designing and developing an educational game to teach decimals to middle school students. In: 8th European Conference on Games-Based Learning: ECGBL 2014, pp. 128–135 (2014)
Gamesandlearning.org: teachers surveyed on using digital games in class. Technical report (2015). http://www.gamesandlearning.org/2014/06/09/teachers-on-using-games-in-class/
Glasgow, R., Ragan, G., Fields, W.M., Reysi, R., Wasman, D.: The decimal dilemma. Teach. Child. Math. 7(2), 89 (2000)
Habgood, M.J., Ainsworth, S.E.: Motivating children to learn effectively: exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. J. Learn. Sci. 20(2), 169–206 (2011)
Hwang, G.J., Wu, P.H., Chen, C.C.: An online game approach for improving students learning performance in web-based problem-solving activities. Comput. Educ. 59(4), 1246–1256 (2012)
Isotani, S., McLaren, B.M., Altman, M.: Towards Intelligent tutoring with erroneous examples: a taxonomy of decimal misconceptions. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 346–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_66
Ke, F.: Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: a systematic review. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 64(2), 219–244 (2016)
Lobel, A., Engels, R.C., Stone, L.L., Burk, W.J., Granic, I.: Video gaming and childrens psychosocial wellbeing: a longitudinal study. J. Youth Adolesc. 46(4), 884–897 (2017)
Lomas, D., Patel, K., Forlizzi, J.L., Koedinger, K.R.: Optimizing challenge in an educational game using large-scale design experiments. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 89–98. ACM (2013)
Lomas, J.D., Koedinger, K., Patel, N., Shodhan, S., Poonwala, N., Forlizzi, J.L.: Is difficulty overrated?: the effects of choice, novelty and suspense on intrinsic motivation in educational games. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1028–1039. ACM (2017)
Malone, T.W.: Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cogn. Sci. 5(4), 333–369 (1981)
Mayer, R.E.: Computer Games for Learning: An Evidence-Based Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)
McLaren, B.M., Adams, D.M., Mayer, R.E., Forlizzi, J.: A computer-based game that promotes mathematics learning more than a conventional approach. Int. J. Game Based Learn. 7(1), 36–56 (2017)
McLaren, B., Farzan, R., Adams, D., Mayer, R., Forlizzi, J.: Uncovering gender and problem difficulty effects in learning with an educational game. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B. (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10331, pp. 540–543. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_59
Riconscente, M.M.: Results from a controlled study of the ipad fractions game motion math. Games Cult. 8(4), 186–214 (2013)
Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: a self-determination theory approach. Motiv. Emot. 30(4), 344–360 (2006)
Sawyer, R., Smith, A., Rowe, J., Azevedo, R., Lester, J.: Is more agency better? The impact of student agency on game-based learning. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B. (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS, vol. 10331, pp. 335–346. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_28
Schell, J.: The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. CRC Press, New York (2014)
Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J.: Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Read. Writ. Q. 23(1), 7–25 (2007)
Snow, E.L., Allen, L.K., Jacovina, M.E., McNamara, D.S.: Does agency matter?: exploring the impact of controlled behaviors within a game-based environment. Comput. Educ. 82, 378–392 (2015)
Stacey, K., Helme, S., Steinle, V.: Confusions between decimals, fractions and negative numbers: a consequence of the mirror as a conceptual metaphor in three different ways. In: PME Conference, vol. 4, pp. 4–217 (2001)
Suh, S., Kim, S.W., Kim, N.J.: Effectiveness of MMORPG-based instruction in elementary english education in Korea. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26(5), 370–378 (2010)
Tabbers, H.K., de Koeijer, B.: Learner control in animated multimedia instructions. Instruc. Sci. 38(5), 441–453 (2010)
Wouters, P., Van Oostendorp, H.: Instructional Techniques to Facilitate Learning and Motivation of Serious Games. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39298-1
Yip, F.W., Kwan, A.C.: Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning english vocabulary. Educ. Media Int. 43(3), 233–249 (2006)
Zimmerman, B.J.: Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 82–91 (2000)
Zimmerman, B.J.: Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. Am. Educ. Res. J. 45(1), 166–183 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nguyen, H., Harpstead, E., Wang, Y., McLaren, B.M. (2018). Student Agency and Game-Based Learning: A Study Comparing Low and High Agency. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10947. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93842-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93843-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)