Skip to main content

Users’ Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Smart Home Technologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Homes and Health Telematics, Designing a Better Future: Urban Assisted Living (ICOST 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10898))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The concept of smart home is a promising and efficient way of maintaining good health, providing comfort and safety thus helps in enhancing the quality of life. Acceptability of smart homes relies on the users’ perceptions towards its benefits and their concerns related to monitoring and data sharing. Within this study, an online survey with 234 participants has been conducted to understand the attitudes and perceptions of future smart home users, followed by detailed analysis of their responses. In general, the users agree that the smart home technology would improve the quality of life to a greater extent and enhance the safety and security of residents. On the contrary, they raise several concerns such as the increased dependence on technology and the monitoring of private activities, which may be seen as perceived drawbacks. The obtained results show that the older adults (ages from 36 to 70 years) are more open to monitoring and sharing data especially if it useful for their doctors and caregivers while the young adults (ages up to 35 years) are somewhat reluctant to share information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cheek, P., Nikpour, L., Nowlin, H.D.: Aging well with smart technology. Nurs. Adm. Q. 29(4), 329–338 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, D.J.: How smart is your home? Science 335(6076), 1579–1581 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, M., Campo, E., Estéeve, D., Fourniols, J.Y.: Smart homescurrent features and future perspectives. Maturitas 64(2), 90–97 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zion Market Research: Smart Home Market 2016. www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/01/03/1281338/0/en/Global-Smart-Home-Market-to-Exceed-53-45-Billion-by-2022-Zion-Market-Research.html/. Accessed 23 Feb 2018

  5. AlAbdulkarim, L., Lukszo, Z.: Impact of privacy concerns on consumers’ acceptance of smart metering in the Netherlands. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), pp. 287–292. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Demiris, G., Oliver, D.P., Dickey, G., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. Technol. Health Care 16(2), 111–118 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Visutsak, P., Daoudi, M.: The smart home for the elderly: perceptions, technologies and psychological accessibilities: the requirements analysis for the elderly in Thailand. In: 2017 XXVI International Conference on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, D., Kropf, J., Hanke, S., Holzinger, A.: Ambient assisted living technologies from the perspectives of older people and professionals. In: Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Tjoa, A.M., Weippl, E. (eds.) CD-MAKE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10410, pp. 255–266. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66808-6_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Coughlin, J.F., D’Ambrosio, L.A., Reimer, B., Pratt, M.R.: Older adult perceptions of smart home technologies: implications for research, policy & market innovations in healthcare. In: 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2007, pp. 1810–1815. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson, C., Hargreaves, T., Hauxwell-Baldwin, R.: Benefits and risks of smart home technologies. Energy Policy 103, 72–83 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ziefle, M., Rocker, C., Holzinger, A.: Perceived usefulness of assistive technologies and electronic services for ambient assisted living. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pp. 585–592. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work has been funded by the European Union Horizon2020 MSCA ITN ACROSSING project (GA no. 616757). The authors would like to thank the participants and members of the project’s consortium for their valuable inputs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepika Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, D., Psychoula, I., Kropf, J., Hanke, S., Holzinger, A. (2018). Users’ Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Smart Home Technologies. In: Mokhtari, M., Abdulrazak, B., Aloulou, H. (eds) Smart Homes and Health Telematics, Designing a Better Future: Urban Assisted Living. ICOST 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10898. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94523-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94523-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94522-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94523-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics