Skip to main content

Vegetation Health for Insuring Drought-Related Yield Losses and Food Security Enhancement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Remote Sensing for Food Security

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

  • 819 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses how to use high-resolution (compare to weather data) vegetation health (VH) indices derived from operational polar-orbiting satellites for crop insurance purposes. The experiment was done in two main grain-producing regions of Kazakhstan, which grow spring wheat. The results have shown that 16 km2 resolution of VH-based vegetation condition index (VCI) and the temperature condition index (TCI), derived from space during the critical period of crop growth, are excellent predictors of farmers’ wheat yields. The selected indices were used to design index-based insurance contracts by applying the copula approach. Empirical results for 47 grain-producing farms in the northern Kazakhstan show that insurance contracts built on the two VH-based indices can provide substantial risk reductions for a group of farms. For the entire sample, risk reduction was moderate. Providing reliable VH-based farmers’ insurance would simplify crop losses verification, make insurance cheaper, and provide compensation in case of drought impacts. These advantages would help farmers to survive in case of weather disasters and enhance food security situation. The effectiveness of insurance contracts can be improved using higher resolution (4 and 1 km2) satellite data and measuring indices at more disaggregated levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnett, B.J., C.B. Barrett, and J.R. Skees. 2008. Poverty traps and index-based risk transfer products. World Development 36 (10): 2045–2102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokusheva, R. 2011. Measuring dependence in joint distributions of yield and weather variables. Agricultural Finance Review 71 (1): 120–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Improving the Effectiveness of Weather-based Insurance: An Application of Copula Approach. Working paper, MPRA (Munich Personal RePEc Archive).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokusheva, R., and G. Breustedt. 2012. The effectiveness of weather-based index insurance and area-yield crop insurance: how reliable are post predictions for yield risk reduction? Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 51 (2): 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokusheva, R., F. Kogan, I. Vitkovskaya, S. Conradt, and M. Batyrbayeva. 2016. Satellite-based vegetation health indices as a criteria for insuring against drought-related yield losses. Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 220: 200–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breustedt, G., R. Bokusheva, and O. Heidelbach. 2008. The potential of index insurance schemes to reduce farmers’ yield risk in an arid region. Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (2): 312–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claassen, R., and R.E. Just. 2010. Heterogeneity and distributional form of farm-level yields. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93: 144–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts, P., A. McNeil, and D. Straumann. 2002. Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls. In Risk Management: Value at Risk Beyond, ed. M.A.H. Dempster, 176–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B.K., and A. Hungerford. 2015. Copula-based models of systemic risk in U.S. agriculture: implications for crop insurance and reinsurance contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97 (3): 879–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, P., J. Anderson, N. Balzer, A. Hastrup Clemmensen, U. Hess, and F. Rispoli. 2010. Potential for Scale and Sustainability in Weather Index Insurance for Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods. International Fund for Agricultural Development and World Food Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, U., and O. Musshoff. 2012. Precipitation or water capacity indices? An analysis of the benefits of alternative for index insurance. Agricultural Systems 104: 645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, F.N. 1995. Drought of the late 1980s in the United States as derived from NOAA polar-orbiting satellite data. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 76: 655–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. A typical pattern of vegetation conditions in southern Africa during El-Nino years detected from AVHRR data using three-channel numerical index. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19 ((18): 3689–3695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, F., A. Gitelson, E. Zakarin, L. Spivak, and L. Lebed. 2003. AVHRR-based spectral vegetation index for quantitative assessment of vegetation state and productivity: calibration and validation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69 (8): 899–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, F., L. Salazar, and L. Roytman. 2012. Estimation of crop production using satellite-based vegetation health indices in Kansas. International Journal of Remote Sensing 33 (9): 2798–2814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, F., W. Guo, A. Strashnaia, A. Kleshenko, O. Chub, and O. Virchenko. 2016. Modelling and prediction of crop losses from NOAA polar-orbiting operational satellites. Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk 7 (3): 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1009178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui, W.T., and F.N. Kogan. 1996. Monitoring regional drought using the vegetation condition index. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17: 2761–2782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainik, G., and E. Schaanning. 2012. On Dependence Consistency of CoVaR and Some Other Systemic Risk Measures. RiskLab, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zurich. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.3464v3.pdf.

  • Makaudze, E.M., and M.J. Miranda. 2010. Catastrophic drought insurance based on remotely sensed normalized difference vegetation index for smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. Agrekon 49 (1): 418–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, A., R. Frey, and P. Embrechts. 2005. Quantitative Risk Management, 211. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, M.J., and K. Farrin. 2012. A index insurance for developing countries. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 34 (3): 391–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2012. http://www.stat.kz/digital/selskoehoz/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 11 Jan 2012.

  • Nelsen, R.B. 1999. An Introduction to Copulas, 357. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA/NESDIS. 2018. Vegetation Health indices. https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/emb/vci/VH/vh_browse.php.

  • Skees, J.R., J.R. Black, and B.J. Barnett. 1997. Designing and rating an area yield crop insurance contract. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79: 430–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, A. 1959. Fonctions de rĂ©partition Ă n dimension et leurs marges. Publications of the Statistical Institute of the University of Paris 8: 229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, L., I. Vitkovskaya, and M. Batyrbaeva. 2008. Analysis of intra-seasonal variations in the productivity of vegetation in Kazakhstan, using time series remote sensing. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Series in Physics and Mathematics 4: 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleimenov, M.K., and K.A. Akshalov. 2011. Productivity and quality of spring wheat grain subject to cultivation technology, crop rotation and weather. Bulletin of Agricultural Science of Kazakhstan 630: 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, C.G. 2001. Weather derivatives for specific event risks in agriculture. Review of Agricultural Economics 23: 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unganai, L.S., and F.N. Kogan. 1998. Drought monitoring and corn yield estimation in Southern Africa from AVHRR data. Remote Sensing of Environment 63 (3): 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1994. Major World Crop Areas and Climate Profile. USDA Agricultural Handbook, No 664, pp. 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA/FAS. 2012. Kazakhstan 2011 Grain and Feed Annual Report. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/.

  • Vedenov, D.V. 2008. Application of copulas to estimation of joint crop yield. Annual Meeting of the AAEA 2008, Orlando, USA, July 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedenov, D.V., and B.J. Barnett. 2004. Efficiency of weather derivatives as primary crop insurance instruments. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29: 387–403.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kogan, F. (2019). Vegetation Health for Insuring Drought-Related Yield Losses and Food Security Enhancement. In: Remote Sensing for Food Security. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96256-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics