Skip to main content

Abstract

Creating sustainable long-term value is always the aim for every mining company. However, the global mining industry finds itself in a difficult position where volatile prices, subdued markets and rising costs are forcing a short-term planning focus for survival, which may be in conflict to long-term value creation. To ensure short-term survival and long-term value creation from Mineral Resources extraction, mineral resource management (MRM) practice was developed two decades ago with an emphasis on creating optimum value for stakeholders including shareholders. MRM identifies economic value added (EVA) as the appropriate measure that integrates short-term and long-term value creation in contrast to profit; a short-term value measure. Notwithstanding EVA being a true measure of economic value, its application and reporting in the mining industry are doubtful. This paper analyzed whether mining companies have been creating true economic value for shareholders over and above the normal profit reported in income statements. EVA was calculated for four international mining companies from 2007 to 2017 and compared to reported profit. Analyses of whether mining companies have been creating true economic value for shareholders in both good and bad economic times was done. EVA has proved to be a true measure of value that mining companies should report on. This study also found that even though profit was generated by mining companies in most of the analysis period, in contrast, EVA was not created. Furthermore, it was also found that cost-cutting measures improved profit without creating EVA. In addition to the traditional measures that are always reported by mining companies, EVA should also be reported to see whether the value is being created.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hall, B.E.: Short-term gain for long-term pain -how focusing on tactical issues can destroy long-term value. J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 109(3), 147–156 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. MacFarlane, A.S.: Establishing a new metric for mineral resource management. J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 106(3), 187–198 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Price Waterhouse Coopers Mine 2007—Riding the wave. Internet: https://www.pwc.co.za/en/assets/pdf/pwc-mining-review-07.pdf (Cited 5 May 2018) (2007)

  4. Price Waterhouse Coopers Mine 2017—Stop Think… Act. Internet: https://www.pwc.co.za/en/assets/pdf/mine-2017.pdf (Cited 5 May 2018) (2007)

  5. Garcia, J.M., Camus, J.P.: Value creation in the resource business. J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 111(11), 801–808 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vorster, A.: Planning for value in the mining value chain. J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 101(2), 61–65 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mauboussin, M.J., Callahan, D.: Calculating return on invested capital: how to determine ROIC and address common issues. Credit Suisse Global Financial Strategies (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pettit, J.: EVA & Production Strategy: Jonah is Back!. Stern Stewart & Co, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prinsloo, J.J.: A comparative analysis of economic value created by South African mining companies in a growing platinum industry. University of Pretoria (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geyser, M., Liebenberg, I.E.: Creating a new valuation tool for South African agricultural co-operatives. Agrekon 42(2), 106–115 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart, G.B.: The Quest for Value: A Guide for Senior Managers. Harper Collins Publishers Inc., United States of America (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Issham, I., Fazilah, A.S.M., Hwa, Y.S., Kamil, A.A., Ayub, A., Ayub, M.A.: Economic value added (EVA) as a performance measurement for government linked companies (GLCS) vs non-government linked companies (non-GLCS): evidence from bursa Malaysia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tortella, B.D., Brusco, S.: The economic value added (EVA): an analysis of market reaction. Adv. Acc. 20, 265–290 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wainaina, G.J.: Economic value added (EVA) and market returns. The case of companies quoted on the Nairobi stock exchange. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Nairobi (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma, A.K., Kumar, S.: EVA versus conventional performance measures-empirical evidence from India. ASBBS Proceedings 19(1), 804 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shah, R., Haldar, A., Nageswara Rao, S.V.D.: Economic value added: corporate performance measurement tool (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maditinos, D., Sevic, Z., Theriou, N.A.: Review of the empirical literature on earnings and economic value added (EVA) in explaining stock market returns. Which performance measure is more value relevant in the Athens stock exchange (ASE)? In: Annual Conference of the Hellenic Finance and Accounting Association Thessaloniki, pp. 15–16 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kramer, J.K., Peters, J.R.: An inter-industry analysis of economic value added as a proxy for market value. J. Appl. Finan. 11(2), 41–49 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ernst & Young LLP Getting ROIC right: how an accurate view of ROIC can drive improved shareholder value. Internet: https://www.newconstructs.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/EY_Proof-High-Quality-ROIC-Matters_NewConstructs-Materially-Better-1.pdf (Cited 6 May 2018) (2017)

  20. BHP Billiton Annual Reports. Internet: https://www.bhp.com/investor-centre/annual-reporting-2017#Downloads, (Cited 5 May 2018) (2007–2015)

  21. Rio Tinto Annual Reports. Internet: http://www.riotinto.com/investors/downloads-16678.aspx (Cited 5 May 2018) (2008–2017)

  22. Business Day. Rio Tinto’s calamitous $3.7bn Mozambique coal deal still haunts them, News article (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Financial Post. Rio Tinto chief Albanese’s downfall a cautionary tale of bad acquisitions (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. CVRD Vale. Annual Report. Internet: http://www.vale.com/en/investors/information-market/annual-reports/20f/pages/default.aspx (Cited 4 May 2018) (2007–2017)

  25. Anglo American. Annual Reports. Internet: http://www.angloamerican.com/investors/annual-reporting/reports-library/report-2018 (Cited 20 April) (2007–2017)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Tholana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tholana, T., Neingo, P.N. (2019). Economic Value Added Analysis for Mining Companies. In: Widzyk-Capehart, E., Hekmat, A., Singhal, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection - MPES 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99220-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics