Abstract
In an ideal world the client should have brought forward the initial need for the project in a co-ordinated and controlled way from within its organisation. The client should not have too rigid ideas at this stage of how to go about procuring his “ideal” building, but should have taken all useful advice from within its organisation before bringing forward for the project team’s advice the strategies that it believes will fulfil the objectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Walker, 1996, p. 146.
Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 32.
Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001, p. 28.
Ambrose and Tucker, 2001.
Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001, p.22.
See also section 6.3.4 regarding early involvement tools.
Ibid. p. 22.
Ambrose and Tucker, 2001.
Ibid.
Walker, 1996, p. 199.
Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001.
See chapter 3.4 for additional information regarding selection processes.
CIOB, 1999.
e.g. CIOB, 1999; Cox and Townsend, 1998; Halpin and Woodhead, 1998; Newcombe, 2001; Pilcher, 1997; Seely, 1997; Smith, 1995; Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001; Walker, 1996.
Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001.
e.g. Cox and Townsend, 1998; Seely, 1997; Smith, 1995; Walker, 1996; Gralla, 2001, for a German text on this topic.
Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 34.
The QS will give advice on a range of matters relating to the cost of the work as well as preparing some of the contract documente and measuring the work for valuation and variation purposes together with the preparation of the final account. For more information about the role of the quantity surveyor refer to: Seely, 1997; Winter, 2000.
Pilcher, 1997, p. 200.
CIOB, 1999, p. 29.
Pilcher, 1997, p. 28.
Newcombe, 2001.
Cox and Townsned, 1998, preface.
Walker, 1996, p. 120, Rösel, 1994, p. 102, Sommer, 2000, p. 20.
Walker, 1996, p. 201.
Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 35; Walker, 1996, p. 208.
Ibid, p. 208.
Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 36.
Dielschneider, 2000, p. 23.
Levey, 1999, p. 25.
Walker, 1996, p. 211.
As witnessed in the introduction of: Watson and Speak, 2001.
CIOB, 1999, p. 4.
refer also to: Seely, 1997, p. 333.
Walker, 1996, p. 7.
Ibid, p. 152.
Which have evolved in the United States in the 1960’s, e.g.: Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 39; Watson and Speak, 2001, and are estimated to account for approximately 20% of all projects in that country; see: Levey, 1999, p. 27.
Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 74; Pilcher, 1997, pp. 29–30; Seely, 1997, p. 98.
Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 73.
CIOB, 1999, p. 29.
AGC — Associated General Contractors of America.
AIA — American Institute of Architects.
e.g. Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 39; Seely, 1997, p. 95.
Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 40.
Seely, 1997, p. 97.
Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 39.
CIOB, 1999, p. 96; Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 40.
Seely, 1997, p. 95.
Watson and Speak, 2001.
CIOB, 1999, p. 118.
Levey, 1999, p. 32.
Dielschneider, 2000, pp. 28–29.
Levey, 1999, p. 28–29.
Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 32.
CIOB, 1999, p.28; Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 37; Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 72; Kubal, Miller and Worth, 2000, p. 34; Levy, 1999, p. 34; Ling, Khee and Lim., 2001; Pilcher, 1997, p. 28; Seely, 1997, p. 97; Smith, 1995, p. 152; Walker, 1996, p. 210.
In the United States this is known as Design — Build.
Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 72.
Dielschneider, 2000; Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 72; Ling, Khee and Lim, 2001.
Walker, 1996, p. 212.
Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 73.
Walker, 1996, p. 212.
Levey, 1999, p. 34.
Smith, 1995, p. 241.
Other typical acronyms used to describe types of concession contracts include: BOOT — Build, Own, Operate, Transfer or DBFM — Design, Build, Finance, Operate. For more acronyms and additional information regarding Privately Financed Concession Contracts refer to: Merna and Smith, 1996a);b).
Newcombe, 2001.
Ambrose and Tucker, 2001.
Ibid.
Latham, 1994.
Walker, 1996, p. 198.
Walker, 1996, pp. 147.
Cox and Townsend, 1998, pp. 322.
Ambrose and Tucker, 2001; Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford 2001; Wong, Holt and Cooper., 2001.
Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001.
Ambrose and Tucker, 2001; Seely, 1997, pp. 66.
National Economic Development Board.
Ibid. pp. 69.
e.g. Ambrose and Tucker, 2001.
Seely, 1997, pp. 70.
Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001.
Actual worked examples are found in the appendix.
see chapters 4 and 5.
Pilcher, 1997, pp. 30; Seely, 1997, pp. 18.
Ibid. p.118.
Pilcher, 1997, p. 36.
See also 4.5.4 for a brief reference to the German standard contract.
Refer, for example, to Bennet, Baird: NEC and Partnering — The Contract to Building Winning Teams, Thomas Telford. 2001 and McInnis, Wilde: The New Engineering Contract — A Legal Commentary, Thomas Telford, 2001 for more information about the NEC contract.
Hill, 2000, p. 6; Latham, 1994, pp. 36; Seely, 1997, p. 122.
CIOB, 1999, p. 191; Pilcher, 1997, p. 32.
Booen, 2000.
EPC = Engineer, Procure and Construct.
Ibid.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winter, C. (2003). Overview of Construction Procurement Types. In: Contractor-Led Procurement. Baubetriebswirtschaftslehre und Infrastrukturmanagement. Deutscher Universitätsverlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81614-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81614-6_3
Publisher Name: Deutscher Universitätsverlag
Print ISBN: 978-3-8244-7947-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-81614-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive