Technological progress is the key determinant of economic growth in advanced economies. It consists of innovations and the knowledge needed to use them in production (Romer 1986, 1987). Innovations emerge from spontaneous or trained creativity, coupled with purposeful investment (R&D) and job practice (learning-by-doing, Arrow 1962); they are thus based on knowledge and are producing new knowledge. People have different intellectual and institutional access to knowledge. The former refers to cognitive and motivational capacity; the latter encompasses access to (high-quality) schooling as well as to job practice and leading-edge technologies. Both result in heterogeneity of “human capital”, defined as a worker's, firm's or nation's stock of embodied knowledge and economically useful skills. In the process of human capital accumulation, innate abilities reduce the cost of education and training in terms of own efforts and are believed to contribute to the development of talent. In Germany, talents or “high potentials” and generally “excellence” are currently considered particularly important for innovation and economic growth. This is in line with Southern et al. (1993) who note that: “When a nation feels that its standard of living is threatened efforts to provide universal access [to education] may be traded off in favor of exploiting talent” (p. 401).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allison, P.D./Stewart, J.A. (1974): Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage. American Sociological Review, 39(4), pp. 596–606.
Allison, P.D./Long, J.S. /Krauze, T.K. (1982): Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science. American Sociological Review, 47(5), 615–625.
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1962): The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of economic studies, vol. 29(3), 255–273.
Cole, S. (1979): Age and Scientific Performance. The American journal of Sociology, 84(4), 958–977.
Dalton, G.W./Thompson, P.H. (1971): Accelerating obsolescence of older engineers. Harvard Business Review, 49(5), 57–67.
Giuri, P./Mariani, M. et al. (2006): Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Inventors (But Never Asked): Evidence from the PatVal-EU Survey. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5752.
Griliches, Z. (1991): Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. NBER Working Papers 3301.
Henseke, G./Tivig, T. (2005): Age-dependent, industry-specific innovation, and economic growth in Germany. Discussion Paper, University of Rostock
Hoisl, Karin (2005): A Closer Look at Inventor Productivity - What Makes the Difference?. LMU Discussion Paper.
Jones, B.F. (2005): Age and Great Invention. NBER Working Paper No. 11359.
Lehman, H.C. (1966): The Most Creative Years of Engineers and Other Technologists. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 108, 263–277.
Levin S.G./Stephan, P.E. (1991): Research Productivity Over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 114–132.
Lotka, A.J. (1926): The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
Oberg, W. (1960): Age and Achievement - and the Technical Man. Personnel Psychology, 12, 245–259.
Rammer, C. (2002): Patente und Marken als Schutzmechamsmen für Innovations. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 11-03, Mannheim.
Romer, P.M. (1986): Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), 1002–37.
Romer, P.M. (1987): Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(2), 56–62.
Rostocker Zentrum (2005): Deutschland im Demografischen Wandel - Fakten und Trends 2005. Rostocker Zentrum zur Erforschung des Demografischen Wandels.
Greif, S. (1999): Regionale Struktur der Erfindungstätigkeit in Deutschland. In: Greif, Siegfried/Wölfling, Manfred (eds.): Wissenschaft und Innovation: Wissenschaftsforschung Jahrbuch 1999. Berlin: GeWiF 2003, 149 - 175.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Henseke, G., Tivig, T. (2009). Demographic Change and Industry-specific Innovation Patterns in Germany. In: Kuhn, M., Ochsen, C. (eds) Labour Markets and Demographic Change. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91478-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91478-7_6
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16628-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91478-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)