Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ontologies in Agent Architectures

  • Chapter
Handbook on Ontologies

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

Agents display a dual behavior: on the one hand they are goal directed programs that autonomously and proactively solve problems for their users; on the other hand agents have a social dimension when they interoperate as part of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS). As autonomous problem solvers, agents need to develop a model of their environment that allows them to reason on how the actions that they perform affect their environment, and how those changes lead them to achieve their goals. Ontologies provide the conceptual framework that allows agents to construct such models: ontologies describe the type of entities that agents encounter, the properties of those entities, and the relations between them. For example, a stock reporting agent may require ontologies describing not only concepts like ticker symbol, but also the relation between stock and ticker symbol and properties of stocks such as its value expressed in some currency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein Abraham and Mark Klein. High precision service retrieval. In ISWC 2002, Sardegna, Italy, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The DAML Services Coalition: Anupriya Ankolekar, Mark Burstein, Jerry R. Hobbs, Ora Lassila, David L. Martin, Sheila A. McIlraith, Srini Narayanan, Massimo Paolucci, Terry Payne, Katia Sycara, and Honglei Zeng. Daml-s: Web service description for the semantic web. In ISWC 2002, Sardegna, Italy, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.L. Austin. How to Do Things with Words 2nd Edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jose Cardoso, John Miller, Amit Sheth, and Jonathan Arnold. Modeling quality of service for workflows and web service processes. Very Large Data Bases Journal, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cristiano Castelfranchi, Frank Dignum, Catholijn M. Jonker, and Jan Treur. Deliberate normative agents: Principles and architecture. In N.R. Jennings and Y. Lespérance, editors, Intelligent Agents VI. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Erik Christensen, Francisco Curbera, Greg Meredith, and Sanjiva Weerawarana. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsd1–20010315,2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Philip R. Cohen and C. Raymond Perrault. Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3: 177–212, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DAML Joint Committee. DAML+OIL language, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosaria Conte, Cristiano Castelfranchi, and Frank Dignum. Autonomous norm acceptance. In Jörg Müller, Munindar P. Singh, and Anand S. Rao, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents V: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-98), volume 1555, pages 99–112. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grit Denker. Towards security in daml. Technical Report 94025, SRI International, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frank Dignum. Autonomous agents and social norms. In Workshop on Norms, Obligations and Conventions (ICMAS-96), Kyoto, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kutluhan Erol, James Hendler, and Dana S. Nau. Htn planning: Complexity and expressivity. In AAAI94, Seattle, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richard E. Fikes and Nils J. Nilsson. STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 5: 189–208, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tim Finin, Yannis Labrou, and James Mayfield. KQML as an agent communication language. In Jeff Bradshaw, editor, Software Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. FIPA. FIPA ACL message structure specification, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michael P. Georgeff and Amy L. Lansky. Reactive reasoning and planning. In AAAI87, pages 677–682, Seattle, WA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Malik Ghallab et. al. Pddl-the planning domain definition language v. 2. Technical Report, report CVC TR-98–003/DCS TR-1165, Yale Center for Computational Vision and Control, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Giuseppe De Giacomo, Yves Lesprance, and Hector Levesque. Congolog, a concurrent programming language based on the situation calculus. Artificial Intelligence, 121 ((12)): 109–169, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yolanda Gil and Surya Ramachandran. Phosphorus: A task-based agent matchmaker. In Agents 2001, Montreal, Canada, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mark Greaves, Heather Holmback, and Jeffrey Bradshaw. What is a conversation policy? In Frank Dignum and Mark Greaves, editors, Issues in Agent Communication, pages 118131. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Benjamin N. Grosof. Representing e-business rules for the semantic web: Situated courteous logic programs in ruleml. In WITS ‘01, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benjamin N. Grosof and Terrence C. Poon. Representing agent contracts with exceptions using xml rules, ontologies, and process descriptions. In International Workshop on Rule Markup Languages for Business Rules on the Semantic Web, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jerry R. Hobbs, Mark Stickel, Paul Martin, and Douglas Edwards. Interpretation as abduction. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Buffalo, NY, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marcus J. Huber. Jam: A bdi-theoretic mobile agent architecture. In Agents’99, Seattle, WA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. R. Jennings and J. R. Campos. Towards a social level characterisation of socially responsible agents. IEE Proceedings on Software Engineering, 144 (1): 11–25, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Larson K. and T Sandholm. Computationally limited agents in auctions. In Workshop on Agent-based Approaches to B2B, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Henry A. Kautz and James F. Allen. Generalized plan recognition. In MAI-86, Philadelphia, Pa., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Lespérance, H. Levesque, F. Lin, and R. Scherl. Ability and knowing how in the situation calculus. Studia Logica, 66 (1): 165–186, October 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. David Lewis. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1979 (8): 339–359, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas W. Malone, Kevin Crowston, Brian Pentland Jintae Lee, Chrysanthos Dellarocas, George Wyner, John Quimby, Charles S. Osborn, Abraham Bernstein, George Herman, Mark Klein, and Elissa O’Donnell. Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Science, 45(3):425–443, March, 199 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. David Martin, Adam Cheyer, and Douglas Moran. The Open Agent Architecture: A Framework for Building Distributed Software Systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13 (1–2): 92–128, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jörg P. Müller. The Design of Intelligent Agents. Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marian Nodine, Jerry Fowler, Tomasz Ksiezyk, Brad Perry, Malcolm Taylor, and Amy Unruh. Active information gathering in infosleuth. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 9 (1/2): 3–28, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Paolucci, D. Kalp, A. Pannu, O. Shehory, and K. Sycara. A planning component for RETSINA agents. In N.R. Jennings and Y. Lespérance, editors, Intelligent Agents VI, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Massimo Paolucci, Takahiro Kawamura, Terry R. Payne, and Katia Sycara. Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In ISWC2002, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Anand S. Rao and Michael P. Georgeff. Modelling rational agents within a bdiarchitecture. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Cambridge, MA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  37. RuleML. The RuleML Web Site. http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/ruleml/.

    Google Scholar 

  38. G. Salton and A Wong. A Vector Space Model for Automatic Indexing. Communications of ACM, 18: 613–620, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tuomas Sandholm. Distributed rational decision making. In G. Wei, editor, Multiagent Systems: A Modern Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 201–258. MIT Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tuomas Sandholm. emediator: A next generation electronic commerce server. Computational Intelligence, 18(4):656–676,2002.

    Google Scholar 

  41. John R. Searle. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Munindar P. Singh. Agent communication languages: Rethinking the principles. IEEE Computer, 31 (12), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. R. G. Smith. The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 29 (12): 1104–1113, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gerd Stumme and Alexander Maedche. Ontology merging for federated ontologies on the semantic web using fca-merge. In Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing (IJCAI ‘01), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bill Swartout, Yolanda Gil, and Andre Valente. Representing capabilities of problem-solving methods. In IJCAI 99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Katia Sycara, Keith Decker, Anadeep Pannu, Mike Williamson, and Dajun Zeng. Distributed intelligent agents. IEEE-Expert, l 1(6):36–45, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Katia Sycara and Mattheus Klusch. Brokering and matchmaking for coordination of agent societies: A survey. In Omicini et al, editor, Coordination of Internet Agents. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Katia Sycara, Mattheus Klusch, Seth Widoff, and Janguo Lu. Dynamic service matchmaking among agents in open information environments. ACM SIGMOD Record (Special Issue on Semantic Interoperability in Global Information Systems), 28 (1): 47–53, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Katia Sycara, Massimo Paolucci, Martin van Velsen, and Joseph Giampapa. The RETSINA MAS infrastructure. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2003. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  50. David Trastour, Claudio Bartolini, and Javier Gonzalez-Castillo. A semantic web approach to service description for matchmaking of services. In SWWS2001, Stanford, Ca, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  51. UDDI. The UDDI Technical White Paper. http://www.uddi.org/, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pepijn Visser and Trevor Bench-Capon. The formal specification of a legal ontology. In Legal Knowledge Based Systems; foundations of legal knowledge systems. Proceedings JURIX’96, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  53. R. Winkels, A. Boer, and R. Hoekstra. Clime: Lessons learned in legal information serving. In ECAI2002, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hao-Chi Wong and Katia Sycara. A Taxonomy of Middle-agents for the Internet. In IC MAS ‘2000, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bin Yu and Munindar P. Singh. An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In AAMAS2002, Bologna, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Giorgos Zacharia, Alexandros Moukas, and Pattie Maes. Collaborative reputation mechanisms in electronic marketplaces. In HICSS, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA

    Katia Sycara & Massimo Paolucci

Authors
  1. Katia Sycara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimo Paolucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, Kaiserstraße 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Steffen Staab  & Rudi Studer  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sycara, K., Paolucci, M. (2004). Ontologies in Agent Architectures. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds) Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-11957-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24750-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation