Skip to main content

Self-efficacy, Training Effectiveness, and Deception Detection: A Longitudinal Study of Lie Detection Training

  • Conference paper
Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3073))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Studies examining the ability to detection deception have consistently found that humans tend to be poor detectors. In this study, we examine the roles of self-efficacy and training over time. We conducted a field experiment at a military training center involving 119 service members. The subjects were given two sessions of deception detection training. Their performance history, perceived effectiveness of the training, and perceived self-efficacy were measured over time. Two significant findings were identified. First, training novelty and relativity played a noticeable role in the subjects’ perceptions of effectiveness. Second, influencing subject self-efficacy to detect deception requires time and multiple iterations of the task so as to allow the subjects the opportunity to calibrate their skills. We believe that continued research along this line will ultimately results in marked improvement in deception detection ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DePaulo, B., Lindsay, J., Malone, B., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., Cooper, H.: Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129(1), 74–118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B., Rosenthal, R.: Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, pp. 1–59. Academic Press, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miller, G., Stiff, J.: Deceptive communication. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buller, D., Burgoon, J.: Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory 6, 203–242 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Riggio, R., Friedman, H.: Individual-differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 45(4), 899–915 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burgoon, J., Buller, D.: Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 18(2), 155–184 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burgoon, J., Buller, D., Guerrero, L., Feldman, C.: Interpersonal deception: VI. Effects of preinteractional and interactional factors on deceiver and observer perceptions of deception success. Communication Studies 45, 263–280 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ekman, P.: Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage, vol. 2. WW Norton and Company, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. DePaulo, B., LeMay, C., Epstein, J.: Effects of importance of success and expectations for success on effectiveness at deceiving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17(1), 14–24 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DePaulo, B., Tang, J., Stone, J.: Physical attractiveness and skill at detecting deception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13(2), 177–187 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Compeau, D., Higgins, C.: Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 189–211 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boardman, J., Robert, S.: Neighborhood socioeconomic status and perceptions of self-efficacy. Sociological Perspectives 43(1), 117–136 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weinberg, R.: Relationship between self-efficacy and cognitive strategies in enhancing endurance performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology 17(4), 280–292 (1986)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Shea, C., Howell, J.: Efficacy-performance spirals: An empirical test. Journal of Management 26(4), 791–812 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison, A., Rainer, K., Hochwarter, W., Thompson, K.: Testing the self-efficacy performance linkage of social-cognitive theory. Journal of Social Psychology 137(1), 79–87 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gist, M., Stevens, C., Bavetta, A.: Effects of self-efficacy and post-training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Personnel Psychology 44(4), 837–861 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vrij, A.: Detecting Lies and Deceit. John Wiley, Chichester (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elaad, E.: Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17, 349–363 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McCornack, S., Parks, M.: Deception detection and relationship development: The other side of trust. In: McLaughlin (ed.) Communications Yearbook 9, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stiff, J., Kim, H., Ramesh, C.: Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research 19(3), 326–345 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buller, D., Strzyzewski, K., Hunsaker, F.: Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs 58, 25–40 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vrij, A.: The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 18, 117–136 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Biros, D., George, J., Zmud, R.: Inducing sensitivity to deception in order to improve decision making performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly 26(2), 119–144 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M.: Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist 46, 913–920 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gist, M., Mitchell, T.: Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review 17, 183–211 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Noe, R.: Trainee attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences of training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review 11, 736–749 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Facteau, J., Dobbins, G., Russell, J., Ladd, R., Kudisch, J.: The influence of general perceptions of the training environment on pretraining motivation and perceived training transfer. Journal of Management 21(1), 1–25 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, S., Klein, H.: Relationships between conscientiousness, self-efficacy, self-deception, and learning over time. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(6), 1175–1182 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Landry, K., Brigham, J.: The effect of training in criteria-based content analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior 16(6), 663–676 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fiedler, K., Walka, I.: Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research 20(2), 199–213 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. de Turck, M., Miller, G.: Training observers to detect deception: Effects of self-monitoring and rehearsal. Human Communication Research 16(4), 603–620 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. George, J., Biros, D., Burgoon, J., Nunamaker, J.: Training professionals to detect deception. In: 1st NSF/NIJ Symposium on Intelligence and Security Informatics, Tucson AZ (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wood, R., Locke, E.: The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement 47(4), 1013–1024 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bandura, A., Cervone, D.: Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 45(5), 1017–1028 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Betz, N., Hackett, G.: The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology 28, 399–410 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. DeWine, S.: Evaluation of organizational communication competency: The development of the communication training impact questionnaire. Journal of Applied Communication Research 15, 113–127 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lester, P., Bishop, L.: Handbook of tests and measurement in education and the social sciences. Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marett, K., Biros, D.P., Knode, M.L. (2004). Self-efficacy, Training Effectiveness, and Deception Detection: A Longitudinal Study of Lie Detection Training. In: Chen, H., Moore, R., Zeng, D.D., Leavitt, J. (eds) Intelligence and Security Informatics. ISI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3073. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25952-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25952-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22125-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25952-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics