Skip to main content

RMT: A Dialog-Based Research Methods Tutor With or Without a Head

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3220))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

RMT (Research Methods Tutor) is a dialog-based tutoring system that has a dual role. Its modular architecture enables the interchange and evaluation of different tools and techniques for improving tutoring. In addition to its research goals, the system is intended to be integrated as a regular component of a term-long Research Methods in Psychology course. Despite the significant technical challenges, this may help reduce our knowledge gap about how such systems can help students with long-term use. In this paper, we describe the RMT architecture and give the results of an initial experiment that compared RMT’s animated agent “talking head” with a text-only version of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., Magliano, J.P.: Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9, 359–387 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Glass, M.: Processing language input in the CIRCSIM-tutor intelligent tutoring system. In: Moore, J., Redfield, C., Johnson, W. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 210–221. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosé, C., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., K.V., Weinstein, A.: Interactive conceptual tutoring in Atlas-Andes. In: Proceedings of AI in Education 2001 Conference (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aleven, V., Popescu, O., Koedinger, K.R.: Towards tutorial dialog to support self-explanation: Adding natural language understanding to a cognitive tutor. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zinn, C., Moore, J.D., Core, M.G., Varges, S., Porayska-Pomsta, K.: The be&e tutorial learning environment (beetle). In: Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, DiaBruck 2003 (2003), Available at http://www.coli.uni-sb.de/diabruck/

  6. Wiemer-Hastings, P., Graesser, A., Harter, D.: the Tutoring Research Group: The foundations and architecture of AutoTutor. In: Goettl, B., Halff, H., Redfield, C., Shute, V. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, pp. 334–343. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Graesser, A., Jackson, G., Mathews, E., Mitchell, H., Olney, A., Ventura, M., Chipman, P., Franceschetti, D., Hu, X., Louwerse, M., Person, N., TRG: Why/autotutor: A test of learning gains from a physics tutor with natural language dialog. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Landauer, T.K., Laham, D., Rehder, R., Schreiner, M.E.: How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? a comparison of Latent Semantic Analysis and humans. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 412–417. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mostow, J., Aist, G.: Evaluating tutors that listen. In: Forbus, K., Feltovich, P. (eds.) Smart Machines in Education, pp. 169–234. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moreno, K., Klettke, B., Nibbaragandla, K., Graesser, A.: Perceived characteristics and pedagogical efficacy of animated conversational agents. In: Cerri, S., Gouarderes, G., Paraguacu, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 963–972. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Werts, C.E., Linn, R.L.: A general linear model for studying growth. Psychological Bulletin 73, 17–22 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Person, N.K., Graesser, A.C., Magliano, J.P., Kreuz, R.J.: Inferring what the student knows in one-to-one tutoring: The role of student questions and answers. Learning and Individual Differences 6, 205–229 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schank, R., Neaman, A.: Motivation and failure in educational simulation design. In: Forbus, K., Feltovich, P. (eds.) Smart machines in education, pp. 37–69. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wiemer-Hastings, P., Allbritton, D., Arnott, E. (2004). RMT: A Dialog-Based Research Methods Tutor With or Without a Head. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3220. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22948-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30139-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics