Skip to main content

A Comparison of Text and Shape Matching for Retrieval of Online 3D Models

  • Conference paper
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3232))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Because of recent advances in graphics hard- and software, both the production and use of 3D models are increasing at a rapid pace. As a result, a large number of 3D models have become available on the web, and new research is being done on 3D model retrieval methods. Query and retrieval can be done solely based on associated text, as in image retrieval, for example (e.g. Google Image Search [1] and [2,3]). Other research focuses on shape-based retrieval, based on methods that measure shape similarity between 3D models (e.g., [4]). The goal of our work is to take current text- and shape-based matching methods, see which ones perform best, and compare those. We compared four text matching methods and four shape matching methods, by running classification tests using a large database of 3D models downloaded from the web [5]. In addition, we investigated several methods to combine the results of text and shape matching. We found that shape matching outperforms text matching in all our experiments. The main reason is that publishers of online 3D models simply do not provide enough descriptive text of sufficient quality: 3D models generally appear in lists on web pages, annotated only with cryptic filenames or thumbnail images. Combining the results of text and shape matching further improved performance. The results of this paper provide added incentive to continue research in shape-based retrieval methods for 3D models, as well as retrieval based on other attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Google: Image search, http://www.google.com/images

  2. Sable, C.: Robust Statistical Techniques for the Categorization of Images Using Associated Text. PhD thesis, Columbia University (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, J.R., Chang, S.F.: Searching for images and videos on the world-wide web. Technical Report 459-96-25, Columbia University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Funkhouser, T., Min, P., Kazhdan, M., Chen, J., Halderman, A., Dobkin, D., Jacobs, D.: A search engine for 3D models. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shilane, P., Kazhdan, M., Min, P., Funkhouser, T.: The Princeton Shape Benchmark. In: Proc. Shape Modeling International, Genoa, Italy (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. MeshNose: 3D objects search engine, http://www.deepfx.com/meshnose

  7. Suzuki, M.T.: A web-based retrieval system for 3D polygonal models. In: Proc. IFSA/NAFIPS, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 2271–2276 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, D.Y., Ouhyoung, M.: A 3D object retrieval system based on multi-resolution Reeb graph. In: Proc. Computer Graphics Workshop, Taiwan, pp. 16–20 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Min, P.: A 3D Model Search Engine. PhD thesis, Princeton University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: A lexical database for English. CACM 38, 39–41 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Min, P., Halderman, A., Kazhdan, M., Funkhouser, T.: Early experiences with a 3D model search engine. In: Proc. Web3D Symposium, St. Malo, France, pp. 7–18. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval. Butterworth, London (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salton, G.: Automatic text processing: the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys 34, 1–47 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. FindSounds: Sound file search engine, http://www.findsounds.com

  17. Sable, C.L., Hatzivassiloglou, V.: Text-based approaches for the categorization of images. In: Proc. Research and Advanced Technologies for Digital Libraries, Paris (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sable, C., McKeown, K., Church, K.W.: NLP found helpful (at least for one text categorization task). In: Proc. EMNLP, Philadelphia, PA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Buenaga Rodríguez, M., Gómez-Hidalgo, J.M., Díaz-Agudo, B.: Using WordNet to complement training information in text categorization. In: Proc. RANLP, Stanford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scott, S., Matwin, S.: Text classification using WordNet hypernyms. In: Proc. Workshop Usage of WordNet in Natural Language Processing Systems, pp. 45–52 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Benitez, A.B., Chang, S.F.: Semantic knowledge construction from annotated image collections. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Multimedia and Expo ICME, Lausanne, Switzerland (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Salton, G.: The SMART retrieval system. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Porter, M.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14, 130–137 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCallum, A.: Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering (1996), http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mccallum/bow

  25. Kullback, S., Leibler, R.: On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 79–86 (1951)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Loncaric, S.: A survey of shape analysis techniques. Pattern Recognition 31 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tangelder, J.W., Veltkamp, R.C.: A survey of content based 3D shape retrieval methods. In: Proc. Shape Modeling International, Genoa, Italy (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sundar, H., Silver, D., Gagvani, N., Dickinson, S.: Skeleton based shape matching and retrieval. In: Proc. SMI, Seoul, Korea (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hilaga, M., Shinagawa, Y., Kohmura, T., Kunii, T.L.: Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes. In: Proc. SIGGRAPH, pp. 203–212 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ashbrook, A.P., Thacker, N.A., Rockett, P.I., Brown, C.I.: Robust recognition of scaled shapes using pairwise geometric histograms. In: Proc. BMVC, Birmingham, UK, pp. 503–512 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Taubin, G., Cooper, D.: Object recognition based on moment (or algebraic) invariants. In: Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision, MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kazhdan, M., Funkhouser, T., Rusinkiewicz, S.: Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3D shape descriptors. In: Proc. SGP, pp. 156–165. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cyr, C.M., Kimia, B.B.: 3D object recognition using shape similarity-based aspect graph. In: Proc. ICCV, IEEE, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, D.Y., Ouhyoung, M., Tian, X.P., Shen, Y.T., Ouhyoung, M.: On visual similarity based 3D model retrieval. In: Proc. Eurographics, Granada, Spain (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vranic, D.V.: An improvement of rotation invariant 3D shape descriptor based on functions on concentric spheres. In: Proc. ICIP, vol. 3, pp. 757–760 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jain, A.K., Duin, R.P., Mao, J.: Statistical pattern recognition: A review. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22, 4–37 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Srihari, R.K.: Automatic indexing and content-based retrieval of captioned images. IEEE Computer 28, 49–56 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sclaroff, S., Cascia, M.L., Sethi, S.: Unifying textual and visual cues for content-based image retrieval on the world wide web. CVIU 75, 86–98 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Paek, S., et al.: Integration of visual and text-based approaches for the content labeling and classification of photographs. In: ACM Workshop on Multim. Indexing and Retr. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Min, P., Kazhdan, M., Funkhouser, T. (2004). A Comparison of Text and Shape Matching for Retrieval of Online 3D Models. In: Heery, R., Lyon, L. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. ECDL 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3232. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30230-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30230-8_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23013-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30230-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics