Skip to main content

Automatic Integrity Constraint Evolution due to Model Subtract Operations

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling for Advanced Application Domains (ER 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3289))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When evolving Conceptual Schemas (CS) one of the most common operations is the removal of some model elements. This removal affects the set of integrity constraints (IC) defined over the CS. Most times they must be modified to remain consistent with the evolved CS. The aim of this paper is to define an automatic evolutionary method to delete only the minimum set of constraints (or some of their parts) needed to keep the consistency with the CS after subtract operations. We consider that a set of constraints is consistent with an evolved CS when: 1) none of them refer to an element removed from the original CS and 2) the set of constraints is equal or less restrictive than the original one. In this paper we present our method assuming CS defined in UML with ICs specified in OCL, but it can be applied to other languages with similar results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banerjee, J.: Data Model Issues for Object-Oriented Applications. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 5(1), 3–26 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brèche, P.: Advanced Primitives for Changing Schemas of Object Databases. In: Constantopoulos, P., Vassiliou, Y., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) CAiSE 1996. LNCS, vol. 1080, pp. 476–495. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fowler, M.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gogolla, M., Hohenstein, U.: Towards a Semantic View of an Extended Entity-Relationship Model. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 16(3), 369–416 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gomez, C., Olivé, A.: Evolving Partitions in Conceptual Schemas in the UML. In: Pidduck, A.B., Mylopoulos, J., Woo, C.C., Ozsu, M.T. (eds.) CAiSE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2348, pp. 467–483. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Halpin, T.A.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/TC97/SC5/WG3. Concepts and Terminology for the Conceptual Schema and Information Base, J.J. van Griethuysen, ed. (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Monk, S.: A Model for Schema Evolution in ObjectOriented Database Systems. PhD thesis, Lancaster University (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. OMG, OMG Adopted Specification. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. OMG. Request for proposal: MOF 2.0 Query/Views/Transformations. OMG (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. OMG, OMG Adopted Specification, UML 2.0 OCL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. OMG. Model Driven Architecture (MDA). OMG (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Opdyke, W.F.: Refactoring Object-Oriented Frameworks. PhD thesis, University of Illinois (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porres, I.: Model refactorings as rule-based update transformations. In: Stevens, P., Whittle, J., Booch, G. (eds.) UML 2003. LNCS, vol. 2863, pp. 2–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Roddick, J.F., Craske, N.G., Richards, T.J.: A Taxonomy for Schema Versioning Based on the Relational and Entity Relationship Models. In: Elmasri, R.A., Kouramajian, V., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 1993. LNCS, vol. 823, pp. 137–148. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sjø, D.: Quantifying Schema Evolution. Information and Software Technology 35(1), 35–44 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cabot, J., Conesa, J. (2004). Automatic Integrity Constraint Evolution due to Model Subtract Operations. In: Wang, S., et al. Conceptual Modeling for Advanced Application Domains. ER 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3289. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30466-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30466-1_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23722-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30466-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics