Skip to main content

Algebraic and Model Theoretic Techniques for Fusion Decidability in Modal Logics

  • Conference paper
Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2850))

Abstract.

We introduce a new method (derived from model theoretic general combination procedures in automated deduction) for proving fusion decidability in modal systems. We apply it to show fusion decidability in case not only the boolean connectives, but also a universal modality and nominals are shared symbols.

Luigi Santocanale: The second author acknowledges financial support from the European Commission through a Marie Curie Individual Fellowship. We thank V. Goranko for suggestions on an earlier version of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Lutz, C., Sturm, H., Wolter, F.: Fusions of description logics and abstract description systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 16, 1–58 (2002)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Tinelli, C.: A new approach for combining decision procedures for the word problem, and its connection to the Nelson-Oppen combination method. In: McCune, W. (ed.) CADE 1997. LNCS, vol. 1249, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Tinelli, C.: Deciding the word problem in the union of equational theories. Information and Computation 178(2), 346–390 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bull, R.A.: An approach to tense logic. Theoria 36, 282–300 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, C.C., Keisler, H.J.: Model theory, 3rd edn. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 73. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fattorosi-Barnaba, M., De Caro, F.: Graded modalities. I. Studia Logica 44(2), 197–221 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiorentini, C., Ghilardi, S.: Combining word problems through rewriting in categories with products. Theoretical Computer Science 294, 103–149 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabbay, D., Kurucz, A., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Many-Dimensional Modal Logics: Theory and Applications. Elsevier (2003) (in print)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gargov, G., Goranko, V.: Modal logic with names. J. Philos. Logic 22(6), 607–636 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghilardi, S.: Quantifier elimination and provers integration. In: Proceedings of First Order Theorem Proving (FTP) 2003. Electronic Notes In Theoretical Computer Science (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghilardi, S.: Reasoners’ cooperation and quantifier elimination. Technical Report 288-03, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Informazione, Università degli Studi di Milano (March 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghilardi, S., Zawadowski, M.: Sheaves, Games, and Model Completions. Trends in Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Goranko, V., Passy, S.: Using the universal modality: gains and questions. J. Logic Comput. 2(1), 5–30 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Grätzer, G.: Universal algebra, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Halpern, J.Y.: Reasoning about knowledge: a survey. In: Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming. Oxford Sci. Publ., vol. 4, pp. 1–34. Oxford Univ. Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson, G.: Complextity, convexity and combination of theories. Theoretical Computer Science 12, 291–302 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson, G., Oppen, D.: Simplification by cooperating decision procedures. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 1(2), 245–257 (1979)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pigozzi, D.: The join of equational theories. Colloq. Math. 30, 15–25 (1974)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Prior, N.: Modality and quantification in S5. J. Symb. Logic 21, 60–62 (1956)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Robinson, A.: Complete theories, 2nd edn. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Santocanale, L.: Congruences of modal μ-algebras. In: Ésik, Z., Ingólfsdóttir, A. (eds.) FICS 2002, June 2002. BRICS Notes Series, vol. NS-02-02, pp. 83–87 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Santocanale, L.: On the equational definition of the least prefixed point. Theoretical Computer Science 295(1-3), 341–370 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Schild, K.: From terminological logics to modal logics, 1991. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Terminological Logics, DFKI-D-91-13 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Segerberg, K.: A completeness theorem in the modal logic of programs. Notices Amer. Math. Soc 24, A552 (1977); Abstract 77T-E69

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spaan, E.: Complexity of Modal Logics. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Amsterdam, The Nethertlands (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tinelli, C., Harandi, M.: A new correctness proof of the Nelson-Oppen combination procedure. In: Baader, F., Schulz, K. (eds.) Frontiers of Combining Systems, FROCOS 1996. Applied Logic Series, vol. 3, pp. 103–120. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vardi, M.Y.: The taming of converse: reasoning about two-way computations. In: Parikh, R. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1985. LNCS, vol. 193, pp. 413–424. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about the past with two-way automata. In: Larsen, K.G., Skyum, S., Winskel, G. (eds.) ICALP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1443, pp. 628–640. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Wheeler, W.H.: Model-companions and definability in existentially complete structures. Israel J. Math. 25(3-4), 305–330 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Wheeler, W.H.: A characterization of companionable, universal theories. J. Symbolic Logic 43(3), 402–429 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Wolter, F.: Fusions of modal logics revisited. In: Advances in modal logic, Berlin, vol. 1 (1996); CSLI Lecture Notes, vol. 87, pp. 361–379. CSLI Publ., Stanford, CA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ghilardi, S., Santocanale, L. (2003). Algebraic and Model Theoretic Techniques for Fusion Decidability in Modal Logics. In: Vardi, M.Y., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2850. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39813-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39813-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20101-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39813-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics