Abstract
Complexity and, by implication, change and uncertainty, are inherent features of ecosystems. In managing ecosystems, or linked social-ecological systems, decisions are often based on insufficient or uncertain data and information. Appropriate and sufficient knowledge, which essentially resides in people, is a critical factor for making informed decisions under such circumstances. Informed action is a function of what we know, and our knowledge is a product of what and how we have learned.
Because of the central importance of learning, this chapter proposes that the development of an appropriate learning capability should not be left to chance but should be the result of deliberate intervention to establish the conditions for an organisation to operate in a learning mode. Focusing on organisations or agencies with mandates for ecosystem governance, the chapter sets out to identify the principles that will enable the creation of such learning environments.
Firstly, the key concepts of knowledge, learning and ecosystem governance are defined. Secondly, the chapter identifies main issues of concern regarding (a) the type of knowledge that needs to be created for good ecosystem governance; (b) the desirable processes for learning or knowledge creation; and (c) the characteristics of good learners. Thirdly, these main issues (10 in all) form the basis for formulating nine principles intended to enable the setting up of appropriate learning environments for ecosystem governance.
The proposed principles are summarised as follows. Good ecosystem governance requires positively persistent and adaptive people with a culture of empathy for other knowledge systems and levels. Their knowledge must be trans-disciplinary, moulded by a common future focus, acquired by patiently engaging their prior knowledge and learning by doing, in an environment of social knowledge sharing.
It is concluded that good learning practice would promote the achievement of some of the principles underlying the practice of good ecosystem governance, notably effective stakeholder engagement, adaptability and transformability. The proposed learning principles could be used as a framework to assess the learning proficiency of ecosystem management agencies and to develop learning strategies for such agencies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Argote L (1999) Organizational learning: creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Becker K (2005) Individual and organisational unlearning: directions for future research. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 9:659–670
Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Bland CJ, Ruffin MT (1992) Characteristics of a productive research environment: literature review. Academic Medicine 67:385–397
Breen CN, Cox D, Dickens C, Mander M, Roux DJ, Turton A, Van Wyk E (2003) Strategic review of river research. WRC Report 1198/1/03. Water Research Commission, Pretoria
Churchman CW (1971) The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organisation. Basic Books, Inc., New York
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128–152
Cooperrider DL, Whitney D, Stavros JM (2003) Appreciative inquiry handbook. Lakeshore Publishers, Bedford Heights
Davenport TH, Prusak L (1997) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Doolittle PE (1997) Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a theoretical foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on Excellence in College Training 8(1):83–103
Drucker P (2001) Management challenges for the 21st century. Harper Business Press, New York
Folke C (2003) Freshwater for resilience: a shift in thinking. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London 358:2027–2036
Folke C, Hahn T (2004) Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9:2. Available online: at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2
Giampietro M (2004) Multi-scale integrated analysis of groecosystems. CRC Press, London
Goh S, Richards G (1997) Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations. European Management Journal 15:575–583
Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC
Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405
Imperial MT (2004) Collaboration and performance management in network settings: lessons from three watershed governance efforts. IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC
James CH, Minnis WC (2004) Organizational storytelling: it makes sense. Business Horizons 47:23–32
Kinzig AP, Carpenter S, Dove M, Heal G, Levin S, Lubchenco J, Schneider SH, Starrett D (2000) Nature and society: an imperative for integrated environmental research. Report from a workshop held June 2000, Arizona. Available online at http://lsweb.la.asu.edu/akinzig/report.htm
Levin SA (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1:431–436
Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14:319–340
Lionni L (1970) Fish is fish. Scholastic Press, New York
Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279:491–497
Lyndon H (1989) I did it my way! an introduction to “old way/new way” methodology. Australasian Journal of Special Education 13:32–37
Maarleveld M, Dangbégnon C (1999) Managing natural resources: a social learning perspective. Agriculture and Human Values 16:267–280
Max-Neef MA (2005) Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 53:5–16
Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63:81–97
Miller WL, Morris L (1999) 4th Generation R&D — managing knowledge, technology, and innovation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
NRC (2000) How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Odum EP (1989) Ecology and our endangered life-support systems. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachussets
Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004) Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9:2. Available online at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2
Parker G (1994) Cross-functional teams: working with allies, enemies, and other strangers. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Robbins PF, Abel N, Jiang H, Mortimore M, Mulligan M, Okin GS, Stafford-Smith DM, Turner, II BL (2002) Desertification at the community scale: sustaining dynamic human-environment systems. In: Reynolds JF, Stafford-Smith DM (eds) Global desertification: do humans cause deserts? Dahlem Workshop Report 88, pp 326–355. Dahlem University Press, Berlin
Rogers K, Roux D, Biggs H (2000) Challenges for catchment management agencies: lessons from bureaucracies, business and resource management. Water SA 26:505–511
Roux DJ, MacKay HM, Hill L (2006a) Consolidation and transfer of knowledge and experience gained in the development and implementation of water and related policy in South Africa. WRC Report 1295/1/06. Water Research Commission, Pretoria
Roux DJ, Rogers KH, Biggs HC, Ashton PJ, Sergeant A (2006b) Bridging the science-management divide: moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology and Society 11:4. Available online at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art4/
Senge PM, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross RB, Smith BJ (1994) The fifth discipline fieldbook: strategies and tools for building a learning organization. Doubleday, New York
Senge P, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross R, Smith B (1999) A fifth disciple resource: the dance of change. Nicolas Brealey Publishing, London
Senge P, Scharmer CO, Jaworski J, Flowers BS (2005) Presence: exploring profound change in people, organizations and society. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London
Schein EH (2004) Innovative cultures and adaptive organisations. Chapter 7 in: Creating a learning culture: strategy, technology and practice. Conner ML, Clawson JG (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Snowden D (2002) Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management 6:100–111
Snyder WM, Wenger E (2004) Our world as a learning system: a communities of practice approach. Chapter 2 in: Creating a learning culture: strategy, technology and practice. Conner ML, Clawson JG (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stafford Smith DM, Reynolds JF (2002) Desertification: a new paradigm for an old problem. In: Reynolds JF, Stafford Smith DM (eds) Global desertification: do humans cause deserts? Dahlem Workshop Report 88, pp 403–424. Dahlem University Press, Berlin
Stein E (1995) Organizational memory: review of concepts and recommendations for management. International Journal of Information Management 15:17–32
Turton AR, Hattingh J, Claassen M, Roux DJ, Ashton PJ (2005) Towards a model for ecosystem governance: an integrated water resource management example. Opening chapter of this book
Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9:5. Available online at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5
Walters CJ (1997) Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 1(2):1. Available online at http://-www.consecol.org/vol1/iss2/art1
Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelson LK (1993) Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction processes and performance: comparing homogenous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal 36:590–602
Wenger E (2004) Knowledge management as a doughnut: shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business Journal January/February 2005
Wenger E (2005) Learning for a small planet: a research agenda. Available online at http://www.ewenger.com/research/index.htm
Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston Business School Press, Boston
Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behaviour 20:77–140
Zahra S, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualisation, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27:185–203
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roux, D.J., Murray, K., van Wyk, E. (2007). Principles Enabling Learning Environments for Good Ecosystem Governance. In: Turton, A.R., Hattingh, H.J., Maree, G.A., Roux, D.J., Claassen, M., Strydom, W.F. (eds) Governance as a Trialogue: Government-Society-Science in Transition. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46266-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46266-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46265-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46266-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)